Quote:
Originally Posted by north 42
Not sue, but London’s is low also, at 60.6, Windsor’s is 60.4. I’m sure seniors are a part of it.
, but there’s also a large underclass in both cities that pretty much refuse to work and choose stay on welfare for life! Pretty pathetic when our unemployment rate is under 5%,
https://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tab...fss03h-eng.htm
|
Seniors are just over 17% of Windsor's population, which is not too far out of line w/national numbers, though about 3 points above Toronto.
Canada's overall participation number is 65.5% which is not drastically above Windsor, the overall U.S. number is only 63%.
For Global context the Swiss at 68%, the Swedes at 71%, but the Dutch and the Fins are both at levels below Canada; while Australia is about on par.
I can't say w/certainty why the difference exists in Windsor, but keep in the mind the statistic is everyone over the age of 15, who could work (not in Jail or an institutionalized setting, people in the military and on reserves are also excluded). Then you calculate the labour force participation rate as those who are working or actively seeking work as a percent of the above.
Inordinate seniors or HS/College students may affect the number.
But I might suspect something else in Windsor.
Many of those automotive, union jobs have or had provisions that allow for early retirement, that could be a portion of the factor.
I might also expect, that among a certain age demographic of auto worker they may have been more likely to have a stay-at-home spouse, given a fairly high wage and a relatively low-cost area in Windsor.
Just a thought.