Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey
Hey! Have you been to Brantford recently? They've been doing an amazing job restoring the city to its former "glory", especially in the downtown area. In my opinion they're doing better than London's downtown revitalization efforts, which can be expressed as mediocre at best.
|
While the architecture leaves much to be desired, London has several highrise buildings under construction, proposed, or recently completed. What does Brantford have going on?
Brantford just has a satellite (Laurier) campus and some small infill. There are still silouettes of people on their boarded up storefronts and 2 city blocks were recently demolished because they were fire hazards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey
London's metro will almost certainly be #11 by the time the 2011 census is out. Currently, it's #11 in terms of it's urban area population which in my opinion represents out city's population more appropriately than the metro stat.
In fact, I think urban area works better in most cases, unless you have a lot of decently sized towns and cities around the principal city like Greater Toronto or Waterloo Region (Kitchener CMA). I've stated many times that I think London's metro is a joke and shouldn't be used.
|
I would generally agree, especially for the purposes of calculating density. However, Statscan does use specific rules for drawing its CMA boundaries based on commuting patterns.
Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey
In addition, people from Toronto-GTA will visit K-W more than London to experience "small city life" because it's simply closer to Toronto and has more character. One could argue German influences helped here. Most international tourists will only hit Niagara Falls-Toronto and Ottawa on their journey, completely bypassing southwest Ontario.
|
Does it have more character? That's a tough judgement call. I'd say they're far more similar to each other than they are to any other city in Ontario. Even the housing stock looks similar, both core and suburbs.
Neither are particularly eye catching compared to other smaller cities like Kingston, Guelph, Victoria, Halifax, St. John's, etc. Not even good or bad...just, nondescript.
Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey
Most out-of-towners come to London just to shop... they really don't do much more here. Sure they might go to a bar or watch the hockey game but that's about it. I'm not sure what more Tourism London can do to put London on the map or make it more tourist friendly but the downtown Revitalization is a start. Making the Wellington corridor more attractive will make the drive from the 401 to downtown more appealing. Simply adding medians and putting flowers in them is a start... does wonders for the city image.
|
Removing the metal trees from the downtown streetscape would be a start. Putting real trees in would be even better.
Not sure what you can do about the 'highway stop' area off Wellington and the 401. Sure, it's ugly like Hespeler Road, but it fulfills a function and isn't designed for much else. Still, it is the downtown core that really defines a city in most cases.