HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #201  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2009, 5:03 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Skyscraper Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 7,927
^Unfortunately, a certain political party doesn't believe in planning ahead...which is truly sad...

And speaking of the Orange Line, some form of connection to the Gold Line could really help, too. Maybe build a BRT or LRT line from the Downtown Connector to Burbank Metrolink Station, and extend it to the Red Line North Hollywood station via Chandler, and then build an East connection through Eagle Rock via Colorado to the Gold Line.
__________________
Revelation 21:4

Last edited by JDRCRASH; Sep 18, 2009 at 5:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #202  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2009, 4:26 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Trump for Treason.
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: No Trump. No KKK. No racism in the USA.
Posts: 4,465
L.A. to expand Zipcar vehicle-sharing program around UCLA, USC (LA Times)

L.A. to expand Zipcar vehicle-sharing program around UCLA, USC

Hsu, Tiffany
Los Angeles Times
09/18/09

The city plans to add 12 hybrids and SmartWay-rated vehicles to the existing fleet. For a fee, students and residents can use the cars to get around.


Zipcar: the leaner, greener solution to the Los Angeles traffic tarantula?

City officials seem to think so. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and City Council members have paired with the Massachusetts company to expand an existing car-sharing program around UCLA and USC.

Adding 12 hybrids and SmartWay-rated vehicles to the 14 Zipcars already at UCLA and the 16 at USC could limit traffic congestion, cut back on exhaust fumes and emissions, and keep drivers from circling aimlessly while looking for parking spots.

The schools are among the five largest of the 130 campuses nationwide that host Zipcar.

The company says each Zipcar helps remove between 15 and 20 personally owned vehicles from the road. Customers say they drive 40% fewer miles, increasing public transportation use by nearly 20% and saving more than $600 per month on transportation costs.

Two new vehicles will be located at each of the following locations:

* 32nd Street and University Avenue
* West 29th Street and Orchard Avenue
* West Adams and Portland Street
* Midvale and Rochester avenues
* Roebling and Levering avenues
* Strathmore Drive and Landfair Avenue

Students ages 18 and older and Los Angeles residents 21 and older can pay $8 per hour or $66 per day during the week, or $9 per hour or $72 per weekend day, to go shopping, pick up groceries, go on road trips and more. New members currently receive $50 worth of free driving in their first month.

Reservations can be made at www.zipcar.com/LA. The fee includes gas, insurance and roadside assistance.

City officials hope to expand the program to the rest of the region.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #203  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2009, 5:30 PM
yeah215 yeah215 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 227
Living now in Washington, DC, I love zipcar. I have had a membership for years and makes things so much easier.

I think it would be successful in Downtown, Hollywood, and Santa Monica: the places where you don't have to have a car for daily business. Then if you want/need to go to place that is inaccessible otherwise, you could just grab a zipcar. It make living in LA carless significantly more plausible--and not just for students.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #204  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2009, 5:51 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Trump for Treason.
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: No Trump. No KKK. No racism in the USA.
Posts: 4,465
yeah215-- I also live in DC, although I have never used ZipCar. The current Director of the DC Department of Transportation was previously a manager of Zipcar.

Zipcar can help decrease vehicle miles traveled. If motorists have to pay by the hour for each trip, then people will more likely use other modes of transportation for trips where a vehicle is not necessary. If a person owns a car, on the other hand, they only pay the incremental costs of gas and vehicle wear for each additional mile. This encourages drivers to use a car for short trips. Zipcar's fleet is usually newer vehicles that get better fuel mileage than other cars. Additionally, as this article notes, Zipcar has dedicated parking, decreasing the need to cruise for parking, which leads to more fuel consumption and congestion (pointed out by Donald Shoup).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #205  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2009, 8:07 PM
IconRPCV's Avatar
IconRPCV IconRPCV is offline
Downtowner
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Califonia del Sur
Posts: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmfarley View Post
I was referring to your ignorant statement saying that the Trolley "...has languised into a system that is only used to attend baseball and football games..."

That was ignorant on your part.

And now you provide new ignorance... a new line IS planned in San Diego. It's called the Mid-Coast extension... Old Town to UTC.

On other parts.. I agree.

Well my ignorance will then again say the trolley goes nowhere to take anyone who has a car out of it except to go to a baseball or football game. I know full well about the mid-coast extension and wished it would get built but I have a feeling it will not get built in the forseeable future.

One last thought, you don't have to be rude, I wasn't dissing you, just our mass transit system, chill out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #206  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2009, 5:25 PM
geoking66's Avatar
geoking66 geoking66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London, NYC
Posts: 43
Considering the success of the Orange Line, it would seem appropriate to extend the Red Line from North Hollywood to at least Van Nuys or Sepulvida station. I'm sure that's been suggested, but I haven't seen it anywhere. And what was the Eastside original Red Line Eastside extension plan?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #207  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2009, 7:07 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,999
^ LRT would be more cost-effective, especially when the ROW is already there. Choosing this mode would also allow the route to be incorporated into the Burbank/Glendale or Yellow Line proposals (virtually unknown, but on the LRTP).

For an HRT extension, Ventura Blvd. is in the hearts and minds of many.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #208  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2009, 7:19 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,999
The original Red Line extension to East LA...


From Flickr, by jwalker64
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #209  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2009, 7:34 PM
sopas ej's Avatar
sopas ej sopas ej is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Pasadena, California
Posts: 4,060


Oh wow, where did you find this map?

So the original subway was supposed to go down Whittier Blvd., huh? Makes sense... hehe though there wouldn't be a stop near the original King Taco, and it would be further down from East LA College.
__________________
"If the climate were a bank, the U.S. would have already saved it."

---Hugo Chávez
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #210  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2009, 8:24 PM
bmfarley's Avatar
bmfarley bmfarley is offline
Long-Time Californian
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California; All Over
Posts: 1,302
Quote:
Originally Posted by IconRPCV View Post
Well my ignorance will then again say the trolley goes nowhere to take anyone who has a car out of it except to go to a baseball or football game. I know full well about the mid-coast extension and wished it would get built but I have a feeling it will not get built in the forseeable future.

One last thought, you don't have to be rude, I wasn't dissing you, just our mass transit system, chill out.
I presume you consider downtown San Diego 'nowhere' too?

Two lines go "to" or "through" downtown San Diego. Over 60,000 trips begin or end there. That does not take anyone anywhere? The Trolley has probably saved the public and private sector combined over $1 billion in not needing to provide parking for visitors and employees. That is no exageration and not chump change. All cities could learn from that lesson. LA certainly has.

Being rude... my bad. I found your statements .... oh nevermind, better to stop now.
__________________
- Think Big, Go Big. Think small, stay small.
- Don't get sucked into a rabbit's hole.
- Freeways build sprawl. Transit builds cities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #211  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2009, 10:20 PM
geoking66's Avatar
geoking66 geoking66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London, NYC
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmfarley View Post
I presume you consider downtown San Diego 'nowhere' too?

Two lines go "to" or "through" downtown San Diego. Over 60,000 trips begin or end there. That does not take anyone anywhere? The Trolley has probably saved the public and private sector combined over $1 billion in not needing to provide parking for visitors and employees. That is no exageration and not chump change. All cities could learn from that lesson. LA certainly has.

Being rude... my bad. I found your statements .... oh nevermind, better to stop now.
I wouldn't say that LA fully has. Even the best of zoning changes still require a relatively large amount of parking, just reduced by 25% (as is the case in Pasadena if I remember correctly).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #212  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2009, 10:34 PM
IconRPCV's Avatar
IconRPCV IconRPCV is offline
Downtowner
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Califonia del Sur
Posts: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmfarley View Post
I presume you consider downtown San Diego 'nowhere' too?

Two lines go "to" or "through" downtown San Diego. Over 60,000 trips begin or end there. That does not take anyone anywhere? The Trolley has probably saved the public and private sector combined over $1 billion in not needing to provide parking for visitors and employees. That is no exageration and not chump change. All cities could learn from that lesson. LA certainly has.

Being rude... my bad. I found your statements .... oh nevermind, better to stop now.
I live downtown less than a block from a trolley station and I never take the trolley, if I am going anywhere downtown I walk, it is quicker.

I love the trolley and want it to criss-cross SD, so I can park my car and never use it unfortunately it doesn't and won't in the near future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #213  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2009, 12:49 AM
NThomas's Avatar
NThomas NThomas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westsidelife View Post
^ And that's the difference between what LA is doing compared to Phoenix and Dallas. For them, it's just for looks. For LA, it's actually about lifestyle changes.
I'm not trying to be partial... but what is DART doing that makes the Dallas rail "just for looks?"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #214  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2009, 2:21 AM
ProTram ProTram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 99
Quote:
Originally Posted by NThomas View Post
I'm not trying to be partial... but what is DART doing that makes the Dallas rail "just for looks?"
Good point, if Dallas was really trying to do it for "looks," they wouldn't have picked such ugly trains! No offense meant to a great and promising system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #215  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2009, 4:12 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by NThomas View Post
I'm not trying to be partial... but what is DART doing that makes the Dallas rail "just for looks?"
More or less what IconRPCV touched upon. Don't get me wrong, I commend Dallas' ambitious transit expansion plans. I really do. But I'm just not convinced that these worthwhile efforts will produce even the slightest paradigm shift in the way Dallasites move about The Metroplex. In other words, I don't see new lines and extensions making a serious dent in ridership.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #216  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2009, 4:22 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Skyscraper Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 7,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by sopas ej View Post


Oh wow, where did you find this map?

So the original subway was supposed to go down Whittier Blvd., huh? Makes sense... hehe though there wouldn't be a stop near the original King Taco, and it would be further down from East LA College.
I think that even if the Gold Line Phase II Whittier Extension happens, the Whittier Blvd Subway can still be built as an eastern extension of the Purple Line. Come to think of it, perhaps that's one reason why Washington Blvd is a favored alternative for the Gold Line. The Purple Line can branch off onto 6th st in Downtown and continue as it becomes Whittier Blvd all the way to Santa Fe/Whittier/Washington. Maybe from that point on, the Gold Line could take over on Whittier Blvd in a Phase III to Beach Blvd. Imagine, a subway from Santa Monica to Whittier.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #217  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2009, 6:52 PM
sopas ej's Avatar
sopas ej sopas ej is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Pasadena, California
Posts: 4,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
Imagine, a subway from Santa Monica to Whittier.
Wow, that would be a 30-mile subway line. I wonder what the ridership would be like if such a line existed.
__________________
"If the climate were a bank, the U.S. would have already saved it."

---Hugo Chávez
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #218  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2009, 10:11 PM
geoking66's Avatar
geoking66 geoking66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London, NYC
Posts: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
I think that even if the Gold Line Phase II Whittier Extension happens, the Whittier Blvd Subway can still be built as an eastern extension of the Purple Line. Come to think of it, perhaps that's one reason why Washington Blvd is a favored alternative for the Gold Line. The Purple Line can branch off onto 6th st in Downtown and continue as it becomes Whittier Blvd all the way to Santa Fe/Whittier/Washington. Maybe from that point on, the Gold Line could take over on Whittier Blvd in a Phase III to Beach Blvd. Imagine, a subway from Santa Monica to Whittier.
I agree on the Purple Line extension down Whittier (with a complementary Red extension to CSULA and up Garvey), but ideally the Gold Line should act as a feeder service to the Purple Line down the Whittier corridor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #219  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2009, 3:06 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,999
According to Wright Concept, the de facto resident LA transit expert, an eastward HRT extension down Whittier is very much a possibility because the Beverly and Whittier options for the Gold Line East II have run out of steam. This time, the subway would branch off down 7th St. to serve the Historic Core before switching over to 6th St. and eventually Whittier Blvd.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #220  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2009, 5:24 AM
Bootstrap Bill Bootstrap Bill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 366
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
I think that even if the Gold Line Phase II Whittier Extension happens, the Whittier Blvd Subway can still be built as an eastern extension of the Purple Line. Come to think of it, perhaps that's one reason why Washington Blvd is a favored alternative for the Gold Line. The Purple Line can branch off onto 6th st in Downtown and continue as it becomes Whittier Blvd all the way to Santa Fe/Whittier/Washington. Maybe from that point on, the Gold Line could take over on Whittier Blvd in a Phase III to Beach Blvd. Imagine, a subway from Santa Monica to Whittier.
If it's going to Beach Blvd. then why not head south to Knott's Berry Farm and then south east to the Disneyland Resort area and then finally to John Wayne Airport?

Yes, it would be very long, so make the OC portion limited stop/express service. Stops only at Knott's, Disneyland and John Wayne Airport.

The hard part will be paying for it, but I think this could eventually happen.

To save money they could make most of the OC portion of the Purple Line an El....
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:45 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.