Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin7
So, hold on... Your investment property has been burglarized "a number of times" and "multiple times" a person or persons have called you, the landlord of a neighboring property, whose phone number they had, to inform you that your property was being broken into? And in one case, you actually asked the woman why she was calling you if she was unwilling to do something about, even though she was currently in fact in the act of doing something about it -- calling the property owner, who then could have called the cops if so inclined?
And you cannot understand why people would be concerned about police overreacting? And that maybe someone would hesitate to involve police in a situation and put someone's life in danger? Does someone live at this property or is it vacant?
And you think black people typically support stop and frisk and having their civil rights violated? By police?
|
LOL. Yes. I'd expect someone seeing a property being broken into to be willing to call the police.
And yes, I'd argue lots of people who live in the most violent Philly zipcodes support stop and frisk in a limited way. There's lot of research that it is highly effectively when employed in micro-zones experiencing upticks in crime. It should have never been a universal policy. Malcolm Gladwell devotes an entire chapter to the topic in his most recent book. It's quite compelling.
Do you live in a zipcode where kids are being gunned down near schools and women are being shot at rates never witnessed before in this city's history?
Do you ever read the comments on Citizen from locals after one of these incidents takes place? It's mostly along the lines of I hate it here, Krasner and Kenney aren't doing shit, what can we do to change this. Kenney refused to declare a state of emergency, LOL, which would have garnered additional resources to combat crime in these areas.
But anyways. Yeah. Let's keep on doing what we're doing. Which is nothing.