HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2521  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2012, 2:33 PM
City Of Trees City Of Trees is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 728
That was one of the craziest ends to a football game I've seen in quite a while. It's rare that the fans can effect the outcome of a game, but they sure put that Utah victory at risk.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2522  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2012, 4:43 PM
Evo5Boise's Avatar
Evo5Boise Evo5Boise is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 1,347
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrancoRey View Post
as we may be the worst Division I team in all of football.
I don't know, the University of Idaho could give you a run for the money for that title.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2523  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2012, 6:55 PM
wrendog's Avatar
wrendog wrendog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 4,104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evo5Boise View Post
I don't know, the University of Idaho could give you a run for the money for that title.
Idaho would beat Colorado. Bank on it.


Give me a couple days of mourning after that heart breaker and then I can focus on the excitement of the BYU - Boise St. game. Should be interesting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2524  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2012, 10:24 PM
BG918's Avatar
BG918 BG918 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,551
The Buffs are a disgrace to their conference and the state of Colorado. The Big 12 traded up getting rid of them.

People in the Denver metro could care less about them anyway, it's all about the Broncos.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2525  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2012, 11:28 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,385
Colorado is so terrible because all the players are freshman. We basically already started over, this year.

But I'm now seriously wondering if Embree will survive the season. A month ago I'd have said he gets this year as a no-expectations mulligan and the real pressure doesn't start again until next season, but the first 3 games could not have gone any worse. Unless they start showing a lot better, or maybe unless Embree starts absolutely killing it in recruiting (unlikely), it's hard to see him here for a 3rd season.
__________________
writing | twitter | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2526  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2012, 12:42 AM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Truth in the last two posts. Honestly, Peyton Manning might be the best thing the Buffs have going for them this year. Less attention is exactly what they want right now. Especially Embree.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2527  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2012, 7:43 AM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,494
Embree is done. I just don't think you can come back from this disastrous of a start. There is no evidence, outside last year's fluky win over Utah, that he can get the job done. It's entirely possible the Buffaloes go 0-12 (though, I suspect they'll still beat Utah...grr) and if they do, I don't see how you bring him back.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2528  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2012, 3:10 PM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is offline
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade Reynolds View Post
Embree is done. I just don't think you can come back from this disastrous of a start. There is no evidence, outside last year's fluky win over Utah, that he can get the job done. It's entirely possible the Buffaloes go 0-12 (though, I suspect they'll still beat Utah...grr) and if they do, I don't see how you bring him back.
Which means the program has to start over again and another four years or mediocrity are assured. I'm sure that CU could crawl back up to somewhat half-ass decency even with a decade of being terrible. But, after that decade the odds of CU ever being competitive again really start to diminish. I'm betting that CU continues to be a god-awful embarrassment for another five years and then has a program that celebrates a .500 season as being decent.
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2529  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2012, 3:15 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
I won't really worry until we schedule CSU-Pweeblo.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2530  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2012, 6:47 PM
trubador trubador is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 196
in a related note the Board of Regents at Colorado was presented with 3 firms who bid on stadium improvements and an indoor practice facility. The got the proposals on Sept 11th. It will be interesting on what the final product will look like.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2531  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2012, 7:19 PM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by trubador View Post
in a related note the Board of Regents at Colorado was presented with 3 firms who bid on stadium improvements and an indoor practice facility. The got the proposals on Sept 11th. It will be interesting on what the final product will look like.
The Colorado Daily has some renderings. Not sure if they are current, and they're pretty underwhelming. But here:









From here: http://www.coloradodaily.com/ci_2139...#axzz26kr0PaHu
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2532  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2012, 7:23 PM
PLANSIT's Avatar
PLANSIT PLANSIT is offline
ColoRADo
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by trubador View Post
in a related note the Board of Regents at Colorado was presented with 3 firms who bid on stadium improvements and an indoor practice facility. The got the proposals on Sept 11th. It will be interesting on what the final product will look like.
That's exciting. Any idea as to when they will make them public?

The only thing I've seen are these concepts:





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2533  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2012, 7:31 PM
wong21fr's Avatar
wong21fr wong21fr is offline
Reluctant Hobbesian
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 13,162
Quote:
Originally Posted by bunt_q View Post
The Colorado Daily has some renderings. Not sure if they are current, and they're pretty underwhelming. But here:
An underwhelming tribute to failure?
__________________
"You don't strike, you just go to work everyday and do your job real half-ass. That's the American way!" -Homer Simpson

All of us who are concerned for peace and triumph of reason and justice must be keenly aware how small an influence reason and honest good will exert upon events in the political field. ~Albert Einstein

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2534  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2012, 1:06 AM
FrancoRey's Avatar
FrancoRey FrancoRey is offline
Stay Thirsty.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,835
So we will get a huge extra facility to the east and some big-ass CU signs. W00t.

Actually it also looks like they are adding some more seats to the West side of the stadium instead of the hideous press wall that's there now. That should up capacity by about 2,000 or so.

If we ever got good enough to expand again they could easily add a 3rd deck to the south horseshoe stands and add another 12,000-15,000 seats. The stadium would go all the way to Colorado Blvd but that could be alleviated by making it a tunnel support structure similar to what's on the east stands. I dream of those days, alas, it may be awhile. We suck.
__________________
Denver's getting infill like it's 1999...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2535  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2012, 1:21 AM
bunt_q's Avatar
bunt_q bunt_q is offline
Provincial Bumpkin
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 13,203
That model actually doesn't match the renderings that were posted. It may not add much capacity and they may not be great seats, but I really like the idea of finishing the bowl on the north side of the stadium rather than having those two gaps in the corners that make it look a little bit like a high school stadium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2536  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2012, 1:41 PM
PLANSIT's Avatar
PLANSIT PLANSIT is offline
ColoRADo
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 2,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrancoRey View Post
So we will get a huge extra facility to the east and some big-ass CU signs. W00t.

Actually it also looks like they are adding some more seats to the West side of the stadium instead of the hideous press wall that's there now. That should up capacity by about 2,000 or so.

If we ever got good enough to expand again they could easily add a 3rd deck to the south horseshoe stands and add another 12,000-15,000 seats. The stadium would go all the way to Colorado Blvd but that could be alleviated by making it a tunnel support structure similar to what's on the east stands. I dream of those days, alas, it may be awhile. We suck.
The practice facility is much needed. These kids are playing in an inflatible bubble now.

Raising capacity is not the top priority of the renovations. Especially when CU sucks so bad. However, the biggest change will be conversion of some/all the bench seating to individual seat back chairs. I'm not sure how much of it will be converted, but that might make the capacity a wash even with the completion of the bowl on the north side.

And, for the record, the Balch Fieldhouse (west side press box) is badass and unlike anything in college stadiums.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunt
That model actually doesn't match the renderings that were posted. It may not add much capacity and they may not be great seats, but I really like the idea of finishing the bowl on the north side of the stadium rather than having those two gaps in the corners that make it look a little bit like a high school stadium.
Eh, there are dozens of NCAA FBS stadiums that are not completely enclosed. They look fine.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2537  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2012, 3:56 PM
trubador trubador is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 196
Balch is going to absolutely change, and the horsehoe will be gone and replaced by a bowl. They want somone to be able to walk all the way around of the top level of the stadium. And yes while Balch is pretty cool, it serves absolutely no purpose. I don't know how much they incorporate into the plans. I would expect seating to be bumped to about 65k.

As for the practice facility it is going to sit on top of a parking garage, which is an interesting idea.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2538  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2012, 9:21 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,385
Looks reasonable enough to me. It will help balance out the massively tall east side addition from 10 years ago.
__________________
writing | twitter | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2539  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2012, 9:51 PM
wrendog's Avatar
wrendog wrendog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 4,104
Thoughts on the BSU BYU game, Boiseites?

I think BYU bounces back after their heartbreaking loss, but I don't think it will be enough. BSU is too good on the smurf turf..

BSU 27
BYU 23
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2540  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2012, 9:58 PM
eastidaho's Avatar
eastidaho eastidaho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: below freezing
Posts: 476


'27' looks about right for Boise State. We miss at least one extra point a game and we can't make a field goal. Boise State and BYU should sign an agreement barring kickers from entering the stadium. Ball starts on the 20. Go for it on 4th down/2-point conversion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:43 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.