HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #581  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2016, 5:56 AM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
Thanks for the pix. It's been ages since I've driven highway 3. Such beautiful country
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #582  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2016, 10:07 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,261
I will certainly take Hwy 3 to get to Vancouver someday...

Some Peachland Hwy 97 Bypass options, yet there's a lot about upgrading the existing corridor, maybe doing a bit of a reroute in south Peachland.

http://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/dri...on-nov2016.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #583  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2016, 10:15 PM
mcpish mcpish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 89
My video through the streets of Field BC, and the Kicking Horse campground in Yoho:

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #584  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 10:24 AM
urbancanadian urbancanadian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 671
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKaz View Post
I will certainly take Hwy 3 to get to Vancouver someday...

Some Peachland Hwy 97 Bypass options, yet there's a lot about upgrading the existing corridor, maybe doing a bit of a reroute in south Peachland.

http://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/dri...on-nov2016.pdf
Thanks for posting. I'm a little confused - are they planning a bypass AND upgrades to the existing route? Or is upgrading the existing route just another option?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #585  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2016, 5:44 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbancanadian View Post
Thanks for posting. I'm a little confused - are they planning a bypass AND upgrades to the existing route? Or is upgrading the existing route just another option?
It seems the bypass options are for discussion only, while there is an actual concept for widening the existing corridor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #586  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2016, 1:34 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,829
The more grade separation the better.

A bypass should be built, having a 4 lane highway through Peachland is a little sad IMO along the warterfront.

The only decent bypass option is the shortest one though.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #587  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2016, 6:06 AM
kev_427 kev_427 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 127
I was at the open house and one of the representatives said that the current road will need to be four laned regardless of a bypass or not. Peachland is projected to have 7,700 people by 2040, so four lanes will be necessary for trips within the community.

i've always thought a bypass was overkill for peachland at this point, maybe in the future when communities further south are big enough to demand it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #588  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2016, 10:27 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
^ it's the tourist traffic in the summer. Osoyoos to Peachland can be a parking lot during the summer months
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #589  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2016, 3:13 AM
splashflash splashflash is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 92
Lillooet-Pavilion Highway 10 Mile Slide

http://www.lillooetnews.net/news/loc...lide-1.3974140

I was hoping for a bridge and improvements on the west side Lillooet-Big Bar road, but at least the route wlll be fixed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #590  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2016, 10:15 PM
Glacier Glacier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 135
No question a bypass is needed. Someday Peachland will be as big as Vernon or West Kelowna or Lake Country or maybe Even Kelowna, and if they wait too long to build a bypass, there will never be one because the land available will be developed. There are already 60 lights between my place in the North Okanagan to the US border -- that's 1 every 3 km for 180km, which is totally unacceptable for one of the province's main highways.

They claim that they have improved the highway by 4-laning most of it, but with all the traffic lights, and no real bypasses, travel times aren't really any better than they were 50 years ago.

https://questioningthedata.wordpress...ays-all-wrong/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #591  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2017, 9:47 AM
vango vango is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 76
Roadside rally: Salmon Arm residents call for changes to dangerous highway
http://globalnews.ca/news/3212913/ro...erous-highway/

Any plans for a bypass at Salmon Arm?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #592  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2017, 3:58 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
Doesn't help that coming into SA from the east you go down that big long hill and everyone is soeeding by the time they get to the bottom. So many BC towns are in the same predicament

I'm not sure how you'd bypass Salmon Arm.. if they were to twin & divide 97 from Sicamous to Vernon that might re-direct a lot of traffic to the Coquihalla on the way to the coast
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #593  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2017, 11:38 PM
Glacier Glacier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240glt View Post
Doesn't help that coming into SA from the east you go down that big long hill and everyone is soeeding by the time they get to the bottom. So many BC towns are in the same predicament

I'm not sure how you'd bypass Salmon Arm.. if they were to twin & divide 97 from Sicamous to Vernon that might re-direct a lot of traffic to the Coquihalla on the way to the coast
It would make no difference. The two lane section is actually faster than the 4 lane section, at least until you get onto 97c. Not only is the distance further through Kelowna than Kamloops, but the number of traffic lights through Vernon and Kelowna is triple that of Vancouver via Kamloops. You think bypassing Salmon Arm is difficult, try Kelowna.

P.S. My alternative route is to bypass Salmon Arm on the south with a freeway, follow the Salmon River up to highway 97 with , and twin 97 to 1 at Kamloops.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #594  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2017, 12:46 AM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
^ that's true, lot more towns & traffic lights on 97, but to go south around Salmon Arm you'd have to dip down to Yankee flats, and from there you might as well bypass the entire Shuswap and join back up with the TCH at Monte Creek. That'd actually save quite a bit of time
__________________
Short term pain for long term gain
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #595  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2017, 4:37 AM
Stingray2004's Avatar
Stingray2004 Stingray2004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: White Rock, BC (Metro Vancouver)
Posts: 3,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by 240glt View Post
I'm not sure how you'd bypass Salmon Arm.
In another thread, ~7 1/2 years ago, I posted details on same regarding a bridge crossing between Chase and Tappen:

http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...&postcount=443
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #596  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2017, 5:40 PM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
^ it's an interesting idea, but I know as I've done quite a bit or logging & fire road exploration in the area that the mountains aling the lake are quite tall. Not sure how you'd configure that.

Still think that looping south of Mt. Ida, and connecting up further west might be a more economical solution
__________________
Short term pain for long term gain
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #597  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2017, 12:47 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,753
If they could somehow change the TCH routing to avoid the big "loops" between Sicamous and the hwy 97 jct it would save a lot of time ... but alas ... mountains.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #598  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2017, 9:43 PM
civiloasis. civiloasis. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1
Big changes at Boucherie
Wayne Moore - Feb 4, 2017 / 5:00 am



Photo: BC Government

A new interchange at Boucherie Road and Highway 97 is moving ahead.

The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure has issued a Request for Qualifications for a consultant on the project.

The competition closes Feb. 16.

http://www.castanet.net/news/West-Ke...s-at-Boucherie
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #599  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2017, 1:42 AM
Glacier Glacier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
If they could somehow change the TCH routing to avoid the big "loops" between Sicamous and the hwy 97 jct it would save a lot of time ... but alas ... mountains.
They could. In fact, the engineering report from 20 years ago said they should cut through the Turtle Valley (a wide and easy constructing valley), and avoid all the expensive blasting that is required to widen the road along Sorento, Chase, and the rest of the Shuswap Lake area.

The government, for some weird reason, does not want to bypass Sorrento and area. I can only assume that they don't want to bypass towns or something.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #600  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2017, 9:01 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,753
^That's so rediculous and frustrating.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:04 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.