HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7661  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2020, 6:57 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 5,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pegasus View Post
The updated Green Line Route includes a new river crossing . . . https://secure.campaigner.com/CSB/Pu...d&acc=NTgxNDIw
Right. I should have stated no new road crossings.
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7662  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2020, 7:54 PM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by lubicon View Post
Right. I should have stated no new road crossings.
IIRC they were going to allow crossings for BRT lines and/or just buses. Stupid policy that I hope no longer actually exists.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7663  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2020, 6:53 PM
Mazrim's Avatar
Mazrim Mazrim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 1,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
IIRC they were going to allow crossings for BRT lines and/or just buses. Stupid policy that I hope no longer actually exists.
I'm curious to know why you think it's a stupid policy. Any new road crossing over the river would pretty wide, and a BRT/LRT crossing is going much smaller - I would guess 1/2 to 1/3 the size. That makes them less intrusive and less likely to encounter public resistance. Making it so new crossings can only be for mass transit seems like a great way to encourage more multi-modal travel options for people.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7664  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2020, 7:17 PM
OzzyCalgary OzzyCalgary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Calgary
Posts: 55
I also don't really see a glaring spot along the Bow River where a new bridge crossing is needed. It seems like we have all the routes covered.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7665  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2020, 7:51 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyCalgary View Post
I also don't really see a glaring spot along the Bow River where a new bridge crossing is needed. It seems like we have all the routes covered.
Going from memory, the city policy was crystalized the last time they looked at extending Sarcee Trail across the river (latter 90s or early 00s).
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7666  
Old Posted Feb 28, 2020, 4:33 AM
Pegasus's Avatar
Pegasus Pegasus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 529
Quote:
Originally Posted by OzzyCalgary View Post
I also don't really see a glaring spot along the Bow River where a new bridge crossing is needed. It seems like we have all the routes covered.
Lots of opportunity to broaden some existing structures in the future though, like the City is currently doing with Crowchild Trail over the Bow. For example, Calf Robe bridge, Deerfoot near Anderson Road turn-off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7667  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2020, 7:12 PM
gmc72's Avatar
gmc72 gmc72 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Going from memory, the city policy was crystalized the last time they looked at extending Sarcee Trail across the river (latter 90s or early 00s).
Yeah, it was supposed to link up with Sarcee Trail on the north side. I remember that someone came around with a petition against the project. I was too young to sign at the time. Now there are some condos at the bottom of Sarcee trail, so it won't ever happen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7668  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2020, 11:11 AM
toddlakes toddlakes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmc72 View Post
Yeah, it was supposed to link up with Sarcee Trail on the north side. I remember that someone came around with a petition against the project. I was too young to sign at the time. Now there are some condos at the bottom of Sarcee trail, so it won't ever happen.
This design reminds me of the Tuskons Bridge. We use some cool resources to find the historical value of bridges in the United States. These resources https://phdessay.com/free-essays-on/countries/ collaborate with students who need literary help. The main task of such resources is the search and processing of information. I read several essays on the creation of the Tucson Bridge in Virginia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7669  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2020, 3:15 PM
Cage Cage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YYC
Posts: 2,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Honest question: didn't Calgary have a moratorium on new river crossings?
Little known point: When the Deputy Minister of Municipal Affairs retires, they are given two dogs instead of a gold watch. The two dogs are named Edmonton and Calgary, after Alberta's two largest cities. Therefore, even in retirement, the DM can continue to order around Edmonton and Calgary.

The province can pretty much do whatever it desires because the province has Crown prerogative powers. Cities don't enjoy the crown prerogative, a concept more commonly known as "cities are creatures of the province". The Canadian Constitution separates the Crown prerogative between federal and provincial governments, with the default being the federal government is the tie breaker.

When negotiating with any provincial or federal government, your side is always negotiating from a position of weakness. In this case, the City of Calgary can have a moratorium on new river crossings. The province can easily ignore that moratorium. City of Calgary has no choice but to accept the outcome.
__________________
United Premier a Elite latte lifter. Climber of swanky bridges.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7670  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2020, 10:58 PM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cage View Post
Little known point: When the Deputy Minister of Municipal Affairs retires, they are given two dogs instead of a gold watch. The two dogs are named Edmonton and Calgary, after Alberta's two largest cities. Therefore, even in retirement, the DM can continue to order around Edmonton and Calgary.

>snip<
but first you have to train them to respond to your commands, or they'll constantly ignore you
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7671  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2020, 7:21 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Some new photos of construction on the West leg.





This excavator can have up to 1,000 hp.



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7672  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2020, 6:33 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is online now
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,761
^Thanks for posting those updates Cdogger - great to see them plowing ahead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7673  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2020, 9:24 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Some updates on the West leg.



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7674  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2020, 6:45 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is online now
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,761
Thanks for posting the update - I like the way that graphic is laid out - very informative.
I came to get confirmation work was continuing and there you go.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7675  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2020, 5:09 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
Thanks for posting the update - I like the way that graphic is laid out - very informative.
I came to get confirmation work was continuing and there you go.
I can't wait to see that big interchange complex completed.

I wonder how much longer it'll be before they award the South project contract for the West leg? Hopefully soon. The province keeps saying that infrastructure projects will be a priority to help us get out of this mess. In the U.S. there's talk of a fourth stimulus package that would be for infrastructure. Pelosi's pushing it but Trump also wants it--$2 trillion! We need to do that in Canada. With enough money involved Calgary could get a full Green Line built without compromises.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7676  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2020, 2:41 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Here's some more update photos of the West leg of 201 along with some info on what they've done. They seem to be making great progress.

Bow River Bridge

This is looking up at the north bridge abutment.



Tower crane getting ready to lift wooden formwork into position.



North Project

As of March 31, nearly 500 piles have been installed for the 20 bridges on this project, totaling approximately 15,000 vertical meters.





Trans-Canada Highway/Valley Ridge Blvd NW Interchange



Trans-Canada Highway/Stoney Trail Interchange

The Trans-Canada Highway/Stoney Trail interchange is called a Systems Interchange, which provides free flow movements from one highway to another. This means that the ramps go over or under the intersecting roads rather than have signalized intersections.

The ramp from the future southbound Stoney Trail to eastbound Trans-Canada Highway has three bridges. In March, girders were installed for one of the bridges, and work is progressing on the second bridge taking the ramp over the Trans-Canada Highway.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7677  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2020, 2:46 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Some rare info on the SW leg of 201.

Recycling the 37 Street SW / Glenmore Trail Bridge

In 2016, nearly 60 percent of waste heading to Canada’s landfills was from the industrial, commercial and institutional sector. Of that, about 12 percent is construction, renovation and demolition waste. Recycling construction waste benefits the environment by diverting waste from landfills and conserving non-renewable resources. It can also recover some costs by re-using or selling the recycled materials.

In 2010, a temporary interchange was built at 37 Street SW / Glenmore Trail to alleviate congestion until the Southwest Calgary Ring Road (SWCRR) could be built. The interchange was designed to align with the future SWCRR design and minimize waste. In February 2020, the bridge was demolished and several components were recycled.
  • Concrete: All precast concrete girders and deck panels were processed on site to remove reinforcing steel and pre-stressed cable. The clean concrete was then trucked to three recycling facilities where it was crushed to be sold for road base.
  • Steel: Bridge rails, reinforcing steel and pre-stressed cable were separated from the concrete, cleaned and trucked to metal recyclers. The metal recyclers further process the steel to meet specified dimensions before it is shipped to various foundries to be melted and re-used as manufacture pipe, reinforcing steel and other products.
  • Asphalt: The asphalt from the bridge deck was milled and shipped to a stockpile on site to be used on temporary roads.

Start of the 37 Street S.W. Demolition



The first girder falls



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7678  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2020, 5:22 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is online now
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,761
^Great to see this - thanks for posting.

One enticing tidbit from Kenny’s speech tonight:
“We will do more, including a huge new investment in job-creating infrastructure projects”.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7679  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2020, 6:57 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
^Great to see this - thanks for posting.

One enticing tidbit from Kenny’s speech tonight:
“We will do more, including a huge new investment in job-creating infrastructure projects”.
It would be great if they invested a ton of money to upgrade and modernize Deerfoot. It would create a lot of jobs and I'm pretty sure people using the road would be willing to put up with delays in exchange for the end result and the shot in the arm to the economy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7680  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2020, 1:17 PM
YYCguys YYCguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
It would be great if they invested a ton of money to upgrade and modernize Deerfoot. It would create a lot of jobs and I'm pretty sure people using the road would be willing to put up with delays in exchange for the end result and the shot in the arm to the economy.
How is traffic on Calgary roads these days? If significantly reduced, now would be a great time to ramp up construction, safely, of course.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:41 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.