HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #141  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2014, 10:56 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,191
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
City of Calgary - 25
Calgary Region - 2 urban, 3 Rural/Urban combined
City of Edmonton - 19
Edmonton Region - 2 urban, 6/7 Rural/Urban combined
Red Deer - 2 Urban
Lethbridge - 2 Urban
Medicine Hat - 1 Urban, 1 Rural/Urban combined
Grande Prairie - 2 Rural/Urban combined
Fort McMurray - 2 Rural/Urban combined

For a total of 53 for pure urban, 14/15 urban rural combined out of 87 seats.
really interesting, 61% pure urban ridings. What is the process to create more urban ridings as the population in the big cities increase?
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #142  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2014, 2:22 AM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,440
Every ten years give or take there is a redistribution. It isn't regular since it uses federal census And census cycles are 5 years while elections are 4 ish years. This last election was the first on the newer distribution.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #143  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2014, 3:19 AM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by RTA View Post
WR policy flowchart:

Code:
    Are the PCs for this?
             |
             |
      |--------------|
     Yes             No
      |              |
      |              |
    We're          We're
   against          for
      it             it
lol, so true.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #144  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2014, 6:10 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Really looking forward to seeing the rest of the municipal census numbers come out!


So far we have:

Cochrane - 2000 growth over the past year
Fort Saskatchewan - 1000 growth over the past year
Spruce Grove - 4900 growth over the past 4 years

__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #145  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2014, 9:07 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Even far-flung places like the Municipal District of Bonnyville is growing quite well It's grown by 1800 people since 2011, a total growth of 17.2%, yearly growth of 5.4%. The population is now nearly 12 000 people!
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #146  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2014, 1:11 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Lethbridge's population has grown by nearly 10 000 since the last federal census. Over the past year, it grew by 2600! The population is just over 93 000 now.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.

Last edited by Chadillaccc; Jul 7, 2014 at 3:44 PM. Reason: correction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #147  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2014, 5:56 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
It appears that by 2041, Alberta will have a total of 7 Census Metropolitan Areas.

Calgary ~ 2.6 million
Edmonton ~ 2.3 million
Red Deer ~ 350 000
Lethbridge ~ 250 000
Grande Prairie ~ 200 000
Fort McMurray ~ 140 000
Medicine Hat ~ 110 000


Also of relevance to this thread, Okotoks' municipal census was released today. The city's population is now 27 331, with a yearly growth of 1012 people.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #148  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2014, 8:02 PM
TriWolf's Avatar
TriWolf TriWolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
It appears that by 2041, Alberta will have a total of 7 Census Metropolitan Areas.

Calgary ~ 2.6 million
Edmonton ~ 2.3 million
Red Deer ~ 350 000
Lethbridge ~ 250 000
Grande Prairie ~ 200 000
Fort McMurray ~ 140 000
Medicine Hat ~ 110 000


Also of relevance to this thread, Okotoks' municipal census was released today. The city's population is now 27 331, with a yearly growth of 1012 people.


Hmm, Red Deer at 350,000 in just 27 years? I'm not to sure about that O.o
__________________
^ Whatever I said is above this text ^
.:That is all:.
My Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132072984@N08/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #149  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2014, 8:05 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriWolf View Post
Hmm, Red Deer at 350,000 in just 27 years? I'm not to sure about that O.o
CMA though. Even 20 years ago retail catchment was 150k iirc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #150  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2014, 8:39 PM
TriWolf's Avatar
TriWolf TriWolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
CMA though. Even 20 years ago retail catchment was 150k iirc.
But what will Red Deer amalgamate with? There isn't much that's close enough for the city to spread to other than Blackfalds.
__________________
^ Whatever I said is above this text ^
.:That is all:.
My Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132072984@N08/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #151  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2014, 12:17 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
CMAs aren't amalgamated. Edmonton is 820 000 people with a CMA of around 1.3 million.

The city of Red Deer will likely be over 150 000 with many more in its future CMA. These cities/towns include Blackfalds, Sylvan Lake, Lacombe, Penhold, etc. But really, who knows what towns StatsCan will include in the CMA once it's created in the 2021 Census.

I could be being over zealous with the number of 350 000, but over 300 000 is likely, as Census District 8 will be around 400 000.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #152  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 3:46 AM
TriWolf's Avatar
TriWolf TriWolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
CMAs aren't amalgamated. Edmonton is 820 000 people with a CMA of around 1.3 million.

The city of Red Deer will likely be over 150 000 with many more in its future CMA. These cities/towns include Blackfalds, Sylvan Lake, Lacombe, Penhold, etc. But really, who knows what towns StatsCan will include in the CMA once it's created in the 2021 Census.

I could be being over zealous with the number of 350 000, but over 300 000 is likely, as Census District 8 will be around 400 000.

The reason why I think 350,000 is a bit high for Red Deer by around 2040 is because the city has been annexing land to sustain growth for a population of 300,000 which they say is likely by 2060-2080 approximately.
http://www.reddeerregion.com/maps4a.htm
__________________
^ Whatever I said is above this text ^
.:That is all:.
My Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132072984@N08/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #153  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 3:59 AM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
I would think Fort McMurray would be higher than 140k. Hmm...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #154  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 4:01 AM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriWolf View Post
The reason why I think 350,000 is a bit high for Red Deer by around 2040 is because the city has been annexing land to sustain growth for a population of 300,000 which they say is likely by 2060-2080 approximately.
http://www.reddeerregion.com/maps4a.htm
The point Chad is trying to make is that not all of the growth would be within the City of Red Deer, and the dynamics of how much of the growth will be located within Red Deer in a Red Deer CMA may change. In 2040, 50% of the CMA growth may be in Blackfalds or Lacombe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #155  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 6:00 AM
TriWolf's Avatar
TriWolf TriWolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by ue View Post
The point Chad is trying to make is that not all of the growth would be within the City of Red Deer, and the dynamics of how much of the growth will be located within Red Deer in a Red Deer CMA may change. In 2040, 50% of the CMA growth may be in Blackfalds or Lacombe.
Mhmm, I get that. I confused amalgamation with CMAs. Those two get mixed around in my head for some reason.
__________________
^ Whatever I said is above this text ^
.:That is all:.
My Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132072984@N08/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #156  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 2:22 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriWolf View Post
The reason why I think 350,000 is a bit high for Red Deer by around 2040 is because the city has been annexing land to sustain growth for a population of 300,000 which they say is likely by 2060-2080 approximately.
http://www.reddeerregion.com/maps4a.htm
Also, no one really expected the last couple of years crazy above trend growth. A few years of 2.5-3% throws trends way off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #157  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 2:53 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
According to the Red Deer region website, the population of the immediate Red Deer region (likely to become the CMA once the municipality passes 100 000) is already over 170 000.

http://www.reddeerregion.com/population.htm
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #158  
Old Posted Jul 16, 2014, 8:13 PM
ue ue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,480
Have to wonder why, then, the CMA wasn't created earlier. It's gonna look odd in 2016 or 2021 or whenever they finally add Red Deer as a CMA that its first stats as a CMA are already approaching 200,000.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #159  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2014, 12:06 AM
Jets4Life Jets4Life is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: True North
Posts: 1,913
2014 Census (Alberta towns and cities):

Devon 6,650
Lacombe 12,728
Morinville 9,402
Okotoks 27,331
Red Deer 98,585
Lethbridge 93,004
Bonnyville 11,836
Spruce Grove 29,526
Fort Saskatchewan 22,808
Cochrane 20,708


2013 Census (Alberta towns and Cities):

Leduc 27,241
Blackfalds 7,275
Airdrie 49,560
Calgary 1,149,552

Sylvan Lake 13,015
Wainwright 6,289
Whitecourt 10,574
Lloydminster* 31,593

Note Cities are bolded.

Source: https://twitter.com/AltaPop
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #160  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2014, 12:16 AM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,191
any idea what Lethbridge's CMA population would be if it was a CMA now?
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:51 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.