Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonman
^ Maybe you can educate us.
|
No, I can't, because I haven't done the research. My comment was more a general statement, because I myself had asked in a previous post if the environmental concerns with desalination plants had been mitigated, but nobody has answered that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisvfr800i
If you comment was directed at any non-english speaking or non-western country it would absolutely be considered hate speech.
|
Suppose that one of the engineering firms building the Carlsbad plant were from China and I had said "My other problem with this Carlsbad plant is that one of the engineering firms building it is based in China. That really pisses me off," how would that have come off? Would it be assumed that I had said that because maybe I would have preferred that all firms building this plant were American? I would think conservative Americans would agree with that. And, would
Crawford have assumed that I was racist against the Chinese?
Quote:
Originally Posted by atlantaguy
I'm pretty damn left-leaning, and I definitely consider it hate speech.
sopas ej has said some pretty outrageous things in the past, but this is WAY out there. Anyone that thinks Israel is going anywhere is beyond delusional.
|
How is it "hate speech" to make a very
objective comment and observation, saying that a nation-state is illegally occupying territory and is killing the people who are living in that territory? That is fact.
The delusional ones are the ones who are denying that fact. It is clearly, obviously, a problem, of the colonizer opressing the colonized. Is that a delusion?
Now, back to California's water woes. And while we're at it, how about that immigration "problem" that author of the article in the initial post was talking about?