HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2015, 10:10 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,786
Oklahoma City
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmont...turn-1.2928057



Quote:
Building a downtown canal helped pull Oklahoma City out of a long economic slump when it was completed 15 years ago, says the city’s public works director.

The canal was one of nine visionary projects - including a ball park, NBA arena, convention facilities and civic centre - approved by the city in a leap of faith, Eric Winger told Edmonton AM's Mark Connolly Thursday.

“Each of these … brought a unique attraction and to this day Oklahoma City continues to grow and develop because of the original projects.”

Citizens approved a “one-penny sales tax” to pay for the projects, he said.

The canal was inspired by San Antonio’s river walk as an entertainment centre with hotels, theatres, restaurants, water taxis.

Work began in 1993. The canal — one mile long and one metre deep — was dug along existing streets in an abandoned industrial neighbourhood of vacant brick buildings called Bricktown.

The canal was completed six years and $20 million later.

Businesses were slow to warm up to the new district, he said. Now 15 years later the canal is fully developed, fully landscaped and has grown into the prime entertainment district for the city, Winger said.

A group of prominent Edmontonians is floating the idea of building a two-kilometre-long canal through the Rossdale neighbourhood.

Winger recommends patience should Edmonton approve the idea.

“It takes years and years for all those amenities to come around.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted May 21, 2015, 3:54 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,786
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted May 22, 2015, 7:47 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,181
Tomorrow on the river.

http://www.albertaboatrace.com/
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted May 22, 2015, 8:01 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,803
OH yes... seems like almost no coverage this year.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted May 22, 2015, 10:29 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,786
David Staples is posting a bunch of pics of the river valley and lamenting its lack of usability
https://twitter.com/DavidStaplesYEG
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted May 22, 2015, 11:12 PM
canucklehead2 canucklehead2 is offline
Sex Marxist of Notleygrad
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: YEG
Posts: 6,847
Considering Edmonton started out as a river fort settlement, you'd think we wouldn't have been so quick to ignore our history. It's a real shame that even today the Edmonton Queen is about the only way Edmontonian's ever get to enjoy the river unless they own a canoe... I'd love to see water gondolas/taxi's built with piers at the major public parks (Hawrelak, Rundle, McKinney) and the spaces programmed. Frankly the Hawrelak ampitheatre is a great under-used venue (save for ESO's Symphony Under the Sky, Shakespeare Festival) but a great model of an attraction that should be multiplied throughout the city... Think outdoor movie series, outdoor concerts, plays... It'd be nice to see something scheduled for every weekend evening ideally...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted May 23, 2015, 11:17 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,181
River was busy today. Spent 4 hours on it and the area between Harewluc and the Fort foot bridge was heavily used. Also the beach and sandbar upstreem of the fort was packed with swimmers and sunbathers.

But we do need a river patrol. Lots of power boat flying down the river while people paddled. Had on guy in a bass boat yell at us for telling him to slow down as he headed full tilt at some canoers. Oh and he did not have registration numbers on his boat.
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted May 23, 2015, 11:24 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,803
Friends were on it today and said it was busy as well.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted May 23, 2015, 11:43 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,786
Besides river patrols, need more water taxis and more riverboat tours like the Edmonton Queen. And piers at Rundle, LMP, Rossdale, Kinsmen, RAM, Hawrelak, Zoo, Ft Edmonton and other points of interest so that people can travel by boat.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted May 24, 2015, 3:48 AM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,181
Water taxis would be good but need a jet motor. The rowing Club damaged 4 props today during a race. And they know the river.
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted May 24, 2015, 4:03 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,803
Yup, friends also ran aground and messed theirs
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted May 24, 2015, 5:01 PM
feepa's Avatar
feepa feepa is offline
Change is good
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,347
I'm not sure I support Mr Staples plea for development in the river valley. As for it being empty and devoid of people? Absolutely wrong. Half the city had to be in the river valley yesterday. It's just so vast and big that David probably felt out of place with out hipster coffee bars and tapas. Judging by his pictures, he went from 105 street to 109 street, and consider that a grand tour. His photos were very carefully chosen to support his point of view, but I'd bet that even he knows the river valley is a lot more than what he bandying about .

Leave Edmonton's River Valley alone. It's a recreational mecca. A place for nature lovers. Sure, some flat foot in a sports jacket might feel a bit out of place, but we have downtown and old strathcona if you want to drink lattes and enjoy an urban environment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted May 24, 2015, 8:12 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,803
Develop rossdale, that's it other than around the shaw.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted May 24, 2015, 10:07 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,786
I would limit development between LMP and Rossdale, maybe no further than the Menzies LRT bridge. As for the rest - turn the multi-use trails along River Valley Road and Sask Drive into wide promenades akin to Victoria Promenade, widen trails at some other spots, trim greenery at lookout points, extend Hawrelak Park to the river shore, build piers at points of interest and that's it - leave the rest as is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted May 25, 2015, 12:11 AM
Makenosmallplans Makenosmallplans is offline
Erik Soderstrom
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Edmonton - Pleasantview
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by feepa View Post
I'm not sure I support Mr Staples plea for development in the river valley. As for it being empty and devoid of people? Absolutely wrong. Half the city had to be in the river valley yesterday. It's just so vast and big that David probably felt out of place with out hipster coffee bars and tapas. Judging by his pictures, he went from 105 street to 109 street, and consider that a grand tour. His photos were very carefully chosen to support his point of view, but I'd bet that even he knows the river valley is a lot more than what he bandying about .

Leave Edmonton's River Valley alone. It's a recreational mecca. A place for nature lovers. Sure, some flat foot in a sports jacket might feel a bit out of place, but we have downtown and old strathcona if you want to drink lattes and enjoy an urban environment.
Think you missed his point... the stretch between the Glenora and the LM park is already developed and has been developed for hundreds of years. its just that right now its been developed poorly and with little regard for citizen's interaction with it. parking lots, institutional buildings and trails in the bush set back from the river bank... for that stretch why not do more formal development with the kinds of access and amenities other posters are suggesting? there are literally hundreds of kilometres of river valley in or near the city limits. we are talking about 2 or 3 km near the core - twice that if both sides of the river were developed. i'm fine with leaving the remaining 100's of kms in a more natural state.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted May 25, 2015, 2:34 PM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,219
Quote:
Originally Posted by feepa View Post
I'm not sure I support Mr Staples plea for development in the river valley. As for it being empty and devoid of people? Absolutely wrong. Half the city had to be in the river valley yesterday. It's just so vast and big that David probably felt out of place with out hipster coffee bars and tapas. Judging by his pictures, he went from 105 street to 109 street, and consider that a grand tour. His photos were very carefully chosen to support his point of view, but I'd bet that even he knows the river valley is a lot more than what he bandying about .

Leave Edmonton's River Valley alone. It's a recreational mecca. A place for nature lovers. Sure, some flat foot in a sports jacket might feel a bit out of place, but we have downtown and old strathcona if you want to drink lattes and enjoy an urban environment.
I'm not one to heap praises on other cities.....but Winnipeg nailed it with the forks.
__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted May 25, 2015, 3:40 PM
Airboy Airboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Edmonton/St Albert
Posts: 9,181
There is lots we can do , but you have to remember our river can rise 10 meters in a day. And there is a regular rise and fall of about a meter every day.

Buena Vista park work is slowly getting started. I heard over the weekend the Yorath House is being redeveloped. That's the house just to the NE of the Zoo.
__________________
Why complain about the weather? Its always going to be here. You on the other hand will not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2015, 5:28 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,803
A few images from the engineering report, April 24,2015 from edmonton.ca









__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2015, 6:50 PM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,175
Maybe its just me - but I don't see a way for a wheelchair bound person to get to Louise McKinney park from the funicular. Where exactly is the end of the track?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2015, 11:11 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
A few images from the engineering report, April 24,2015 from edmonton.ca




Wow. File this alignment in the batsh!t crazy folder. Why in God's name would they terminate the south end of this thing in the middle of that no-mans land?
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:40 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.