HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1301  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2019, 1:35 PM
cambron J's Avatar
cambron J cambron J is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 150
DC lost the commercial development war 30 years ago. The key word in Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project is corridor. The branch would have never been built without the ten other stations or no station through Tysons Corner. When all is said and done no more then 6 trains an hour will be operated between downtown DC and the airport during peak. Less then 10 percent of the passengers using the branch will pass through the faregates at the airport. It is my believe that 1/4 of the passengers using the branch will not leave Virginia.
__________________
John in the sand box of Maryland's eastern shore.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1302  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2019, 5:45 PM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by cambron J View Post
Less then 10 percent of the passengers using the branch will pass through the faregates at the airport. It is my believe that 1/4 of the passengers using the branch will not leave Virginia.
No doubt several thousand people work at Dulles. I have seen statistics elsewhere that airport station use can be 50% or more airport workers, not passengers. Also, it appears that e-commerce and other large warehouses are destined for the area past Dulles, so the silver line will provide a cheap way for low-wage workers to get to that area from other parts of the metro region. Unfortunately, the airport terminal adds about 1.5 miles, or about 2 minutes, to the route as compared to simply following the Dulles Toll Road from the Dulles Greenway, which is just one more thing slowing the line down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1303  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2019, 7:14 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg View Post
No doubt several thousand people work at Dulles. I have seen statistics elsewhere that airport station use can be 50% or more airport workers, not passengers. Also, it appears that e-commerce and other large warehouses are destined for the area past Dulles, so the silver line will provide a cheap way for low-wage workers to get to that area from other parts of the metro region. Unfortunately, the airport terminal adds about 1.5 miles, or about 2 minutes, to the route as compared to simply following the Dulles Toll Road from the Dulles Greenway, which is just one more thing slowing the line down.
Yes but there are hundreds of thousands of jobs at Tysons and the Dulles Corridor (Reston - Herndon). As I said before, serving this corridor and allowing it to grow into dense neighborhoods of jobs and housing without suffocating on auto congestion is the primary goal of the Dulles metro extension. Connecting to the airport is secondary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1304  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2019, 1:53 PM
cambron J's Avatar
cambron J cambron J is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 150
202_Cyclist
Yes but there are hundreds of thousands of jobs at Tysons and the Dulles Corridor (Reston - Herndon). As I said before, serving this corridor and allowing it to grow into dense neighborhoods of jobs and housing without suffocating on auto congestion is the primary goal of the Dulles metro extension. Connecting to the airport is secondary.


Connecting to the airport was the primary goal. Serving the rest of the development in the corridor made it viable. If you look at WMATA's 1968 Adopted Area Regional System map you will notice the dashed lines denoted as future for the Dulles branch is lightly developed.
__________________
John in the sand box of Maryland's eastern shore.

Last edited by cambron J; Aug 17, 2019 at 10:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1305  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2019, 6:43 PM
jtown,man jtown,man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by cambron J View Post
DC lost the commercial development war 30 years ago. The key word in Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project is corridor. The branch would have never been built without the ten other stations or no station through Tysons Corner. When all is said and done no more then 6 trains an hour will be operated between downtown DC and the airport during peak. Less then 10 percent of the passengers using the branch will pass through the faregates at the airport. It is my believe that 1/4 of the passengers using the branch will not leave Virginia.
So 25% of people will use this within Virginia while never going into DC? Good. That can only mean continued densification of that area while still 75% are going into DC.

Seems like a win-win.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1306  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2019, 9:33 PM
RCDC's Avatar
RCDC RCDC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: DC, an eruptive vent of wealth
Posts: 416
Purple Line progress has been a bit slow but here's the Riverdale Park Station Platform (or will be).

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1307  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2019, 2:01 AM
jtown,man jtown,man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,149
Sweet. I know the Purple line pretty much just started but after the Silver line finishes up and this is also finished is there any other extensions, new lines, or new stations planned for DC?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1308  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2019, 2:05 AM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtown,man View Post
Sweet. I know the Purple line pretty much just started but after the Silver line finishes up and this is also finished is there any other extensions, new lines, or new stations planned for DC?
The Potomac Yards infill station on the Blue/Yellow lines.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1309  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2019, 4:12 AM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,384
After the Silver & Purple lines, and the Potomac Yard infill station, the next generation of big transit spending will consist of:
  • A lot of BRT projects
  • 1 or 2 streetcar extensions
  • Megaproject to replace Long Bridge, the intercity rail bridge between DC & Virginia. It'll allow big increases in the frequency of commuter & intercity trains south of DC.
It won't be until the following generation, if ever, that other new Metro or light rail lines are on the table again.
__________________
writing | twitter | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1310  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2019, 3:46 PM
jtown,man jtown,man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,149
Oh yeah, I forgot I asked pretty much this same question some time ago and forgot about Potomac Yards. As locals, do yall think that station in-fill a big deal?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1311  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2019, 3:51 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtown,man View Post
Oh yeah, I forgot I asked pretty much this same question some time ago and forgot about Potomac Yards. As locals, do yall think that station in-fill a big deal?
With the growth that Amazon will bring at nearby Crystal City, I think the Potomac Yard infill station will be pretty significant. That area was growing rapidly before the Amazon announcement.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1312  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2019, 5:36 PM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,165
What opinions do people here have about the purple line? Will it be fast enough, without full grade separation, to be effective in pulling people out of their cars?

The super project that would change things in a big way for the DC area would be a link for the purple line between Bethesda and Tysons, which would have to be almost completely underground, and which would have few stations.

As another poster mentioned, there isn't much potential for office job growth in the district because of the federal government's control of most good sites and the many historic buildings that complicate or prevent modern construction. So nearly all of the job growth will be in the various suburban downtowns and office areas. Connecting those independent of the existing metro system would be a big deal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1313  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2019, 12:03 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,373
I think it will be a huge success. That's my prediction. Short and simple.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1314  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2019, 3:00 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,770
I think the Purple Line will have fairly pathetic ridership. Suburb-to-suburb transit will never have high market share (and I say this as someone who took the bus every day between Bethesda and Silver Spring - was almost entirely non-choice riders).

The Silver Line, however, will do quite well, long-term. Of course it's also much more expensive; one expects higher ridership with heavy rail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1315  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2019, 4:20 PM
RCDC's Avatar
RCDC RCDC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: DC, an eruptive vent of wealth
Posts: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg View Post
The super project that would change things in a big way for the DC area would be a link for the purple line between Bethesda and Tysons, which would have to be almost completely underground, and which would have few stations.
Not a bad idea; although Tysons seems to be in another world it's only 8 miles from Bethesda (same distance as Rockville!) The line could tunnel to a station at the CIA campus and then go above ground and follow 123 with a station in McLean and then join the silver line McLean station.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
I think the Purple Line will have fairly pathetic ridership. Suburb-to-suburb transit will never have high market share (and I say this as someone who took the bus every day between Bethesda and Silver Spring - was almost entirely non-choice riders).
Did you interview them? Yeah, the J bus kinda sucks but it's the only way to get there without a car. The Purple Line is cutting through one of the most congested and screwed up areas in the region. East-west travel is somewhat limited to 410 and University Blvd, and both are a mess. Apart from that, this isn't just a rail, it's part of a larger plan to revitalize and redevelop a number of areas with density and TOD (which Montgomery and PG counties are being aggressive with). In fact that's already happening:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1316  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2019, 4:36 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,945
The Purple line will also vastly improve travel for people heading from Bethesda and other communities in Montgomery County to Baltimore and other destinations along the Northeast Corridor via MARC and Amtrak, by avoiding a trip to Union Station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1317  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2019, 4:37 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
I think the Purple Line will have fairly pathetic ridership. Suburb-to-suburb transit will never have high market share (and I say this as someone who took the bus every day between Bethesda and Silver Spring - was almost entirely non-choice riders).

The Silver Line, however, will do quite well, long-term. Of course it's also much more expensive; one expects higher ridership with heavy rail.
The Purple Line goes to good transit markets. The Silver Line doesn't. The former is going to do better than the latter.

People will be annoyed that Purple Line is slower than Metro, but it'll be a lot faster than the bus and a lot of people will ride it.
__________________
writing | twitter | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1318  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2019, 5:19 PM
RCDC's Avatar
RCDC RCDC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: DC, an eruptive vent of wealth
Posts: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by 202_Cyclist View Post
The Purple line will also vastly improve travel for people heading from Bethesda and other communities in Montgomery County to Baltimore and other destinations along the Northeast Corridor via MARC and Amtrak, by avoiding a trip to Union Station.
Great point, connecting to New Carrolton was brilliant for that reason. As a bonus, from there it's a 20 min train ride to BWI; although the MARC trains don't run as frequently as Metro it's still way closer and easier to get to than Dulles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1319  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2019, 5:34 PM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCDC View Post
The Purple Line is cutting through one of the most congested and screwed up areas in the region.
The Washington region suffers a ton today because it wasn't a "real" place in the 1800s and so didn't develop the radial roads and railroad network that pretty much everywhere else has on the East Coast and the Great Lakes region. And despite the Potomac and Anacostia being pretty minor rivers, they act to separate the various suburban areas as profoundly as much more significant bodies of water elsewhere. The whole place is like the complete opposite of Pittsburgh.

Everything outside of the conspicuous organization of The District is seemingly as disorganized as the country roads that comprise suburban Atlanta. There aren't many alternate ways to get anywhere. You can see that there weren't many small towns in what now comprises suburban Washington.

There also wasn't a big freight rail network that was abandoned after industry pulled out like in Boston, which is how they came to have a very large commuter rail network.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1320  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2019, 7:54 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg View Post
The Washington region suffers a ton today because it wasn't a "real" place in the 1800s and so didn't develop the radial roads and railroad network that pretty much everywhere else has on the East Coast and the Great Lakes region.
This is factually wrong. Georgetown and Alexandria were large (for their era) colonial port cities long before Washington was created. You can see this reflected in the 18th and 19th century road and rail networks, which hub as much out of Georgetown and Alexandria as they did from Washington.

What the region lacks is that it did not develop 19th Century heavy industry, and thus has comparatively few rail corridors for a city of its size. We could discuss the reasons it didn't develop very much heavy industry, but suffice to say they are not because it "wasn't a place."

In 1800 Washington+Georgetown+Alexandria would have been the 6th largest city in the country. Individually each of them was among the largest 30 or so, and were all larger than any city in what is now the midwest.
__________________
writing | twitter | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:06 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.