Quote:
Originally Posted by jmecklenborg
The Washington region suffers a ton today because it wasn't a "real" place in the 1800s and so didn't develop the radial roads and railroad network that pretty much everywhere else has on the East Coast and the Great Lakes region.
|
This is factually wrong. Georgetown and Alexandria were large (for their era) colonial port cities long before Washington was created. You can see this reflected in the 18th and 19th century road and rail networks, which hub as much out of Georgetown and Alexandria as they did from Washington.
What the region lacks is that it did not develop 19th Century heavy industry, and thus has comparatively few rail corridors for a city of its size. We could discuss the reasons it didn't develop very much heavy industry, but suffice to say they are not because it "wasn't a place."
In 1800 Washington+Georgetown+Alexandria would have been the 6th largest city in the country. Individually each of them was among the largest 30 or so, and were all larger than any city in what is now the midwest.