HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2421  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2023, 12:04 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2O View Post
I wonder about the effect of the Balcones Escarpment. I'm not a meteorologist or geographer, but my understanding is that the more arid conditions west of the 100th meridian are caused by a rain shadow of the Rocky Mountains. I also understand that the same effect occurs at a smaller, more local scale due to the Balcones Escarpment. Apparently, the reason big storms seem to go around Austin is that the ground moisture and warm rising air feeding big storms have much greater height to rise after crossing the escarpment and tend to unload east of I35. If dryer conditions move further east, and the Hill Country gets even more arid than it is today, wouldn't that increase the size of the rain shadow?
UT researches have hypothesized that the austin rain dome could be caused by the metros rectangular shape along 35. Pretty interesting.

Study: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley....9/2022EF002654

Article: https://www.kxan.com/weather-traffic...discovers/amp/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2422  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2023, 4:55 PM
ATX2030 ATX2030 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 811
Austin's downtown recovery lags behind Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Nashville and more

By Joanne Drilling and Cody Baird – Austin Business Journal
Oct 27, 2023

https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n...very-data.html

Compared to other major North American metros, Austin's downtown recovery has been fairly middle-of-the-road.

That's according to new data from the University of Toronto School of Cities and the Institute of Governmental Studies at UC Berkeley, which have been analyzing GPS data from more than 18 million North American smartphones to determine how downtown visits compare to pre-pandemic totals.

In Austin, downtown visits are now 73% of their 2019 levels, according to that data. By comparison, the national average is 74%.

Only Las Vegas reported a full recovery, with a 103% increase from 2019. Other major metros that outpaced Austin's recovery include Nashville, Atlanta, Los Angeles and San Antonio. On the other hand, Austin beat out Dallas, San Francisco and New York City's recoveries.

Much is riding on cities' efforts to get downtown activity back to pre-pandemic levels. The office market remains in a state of flux due to hybrid work schedules and mounting loan maturities. A host of retailers and other small businesses have struggled due to losses in foot traffic. And in downtown Austin, a handful of office towers sit empty.

A variety of factors have affected how metros have fared in the recovery analysis.

"It's about the diversity of the downtown economy," said Karen Chapple, director of the School of Cities program and a professor of geography and planning at the University of Toronto. "There are places that were specialized in finance and tech but still came back because of very strong entertainment sectors, or education or health. Those are the drivers of recovery."

To be sure, this data isn't the only metric to track downtown recovery.

According to Kastle Systems' Back to Work Barometer, which tracks office use across 10 major U.S. markets through the use of keycard swipes, occupancy rates for the Austin area from Oct. 12-18 were 42% on the lowest occupied day and 71% on the highest day. That roughly matches up with anecdotes from local office landlords.

The average occupancy for the 10 metros ranged from 32% to 60% — worse than Austin.

The Kastle Systems data indicates that, on average, Friday was the lowest occupied day and Tuesday was the highest occupied.

Vacancy rates in Austin-area office buildings have continued to rise over the past year — they hit 18% in the third quarter of 2023, according to commercial real estate firm Partners — and downtown is no exception. Class A office space vacancy in the Central Business District hit 26% in third quarter of 2023, a year-over-year increase from 25%, according to Partners' data.

But that 26% vacancy rate downtown isn't telling the full story. Even if about 75% space in downtown is leased, it isn't physically occupied.

As of Oct. 16, the Austin area had a record 6.2 million square feet of office space available for sublease, with 63% of that space being vacant, said Steve Triolet, senior vice president of research and market forecasting with Partners. Six million square feet is roughly tantamount to

Facebook parent company Meta Platforms Inc., for instance, has about 709,000 square feet of downtown office space on the sublease market, with 589,000 square feet of that space in the new Sixth and Guadalupe tower that's completely vacant.

Meanwhile, other companies such as digital coupon provider RetailMeNot are planning to drastically reduce their downtown real estate commitments as lease terms near completion.

Even more distressing than the sublease market exploding and companies opting to reduce their footprints, there are a few new office buildings in Austin's skyline standing completely empty and the Washington Post is reporting to the world, citing Cushman & Wakefield data, that 87% of new office buildings in Austin will soon open vacant.

Take Innovation Tower, for example. It is downtown, close to the University of Texas, and it's totally empty, as is Google's sail tower near Lady Bird Lake and the previously mentioned Sixth and Guadalupe tower that Meta leased in its entirety. On top of that, huge office campuses in the periphery are seeking tenants — such as the old 3M campus near Lake Travis....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2423  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2023, 5:15 AM
enragedcamel enragedcamel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 486
This thread has slowed down a lot. Doesn't bode well for Austin's economic growth huh?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2424  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2023, 5:40 AM
JoninATX JoninATX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The ATX
Posts: 3,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by enragedcamel View Post
This thread has slowed down a lot. Doesn't bode well for Austin's economic growth huh?
Growth is still strong. The ABJ has numerous updates on job growth throughout the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2425  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2023, 6:09 PM
Werdman89 Werdman89 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoninATX View Post
Growth is still strong. The ABJ has numerous updates on job growth throughout the area.
Yeah, I think you could argue nearly every article on ABJ could be reposted in this thread, but it'd be quite repetitive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2426  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2023, 7:57 PM
enragedcamel enragedcamel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 486
Well, most readers of this forum probably don't have an ABJ subscription, so I'd argue that posting links here would be valuable!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2427  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2023, 10:10 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,275
Delete.

Last edited by freerover; Nov 26, 2023 at 1:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2428  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2023, 10:26 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,588
I'm a pretty religious ABJ reader, and there's still a lot of growth happening, but the big stuff -- the Teslas, the Oracles, the Samsungs -- isn't happening anymore. I'm still trying to gauge whether the city has lost its luster, or people perceive that it's outgrown itself and needs time for infrastructure catch up, or if corporate relos themselves have slowed down.

My sense, too, is that corporations, especially in the tech space, are still figuring out the WFH conundrum, and what that does to their choices of where to plant offices, or what an HQ might really mean in that context.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2429  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2023, 12:12 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver
Posts: 5,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
I'm a pretty religious ABJ reader, and there's still a lot of growth happening, but the big stuff -- the Teslas, the Oracles, the Samsungs -- isn't happening anymore. I'm still trying to gauge whether the city has lost its luster, or people perceive that it's outgrown itself and needs time for infrastructure catch up, or if corporate relos themselves have slowed down.

My sense, too, is that corporations, especially in the tech space, are still figuring out the WFH conundrum, and what that does to their choices of where to plant offices, or what an HQ might really mean in that context.
All of our relocations were tech, and there’s also the tech downturn to think about. Austin will have to wait for a reheating of that market, until the downsizing has been over for awhile, things have stabilized, and companies expanding again until more relocations could potentially happen.
__________________
HTOWN: 2305k (+10%) + MSA suburbs: 4818k (+26%) + CSA exurbs: 190k (+6%)
BIGD: 1304k (+9%) + MSA div. suburbs: 3826k (+26%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 394k (+8%)
FTW: 919k (+24%) + MSA div. suburbs: 1589k (+14%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 90k (+12%)
SATX: 1435k (+8%) + MSA suburbs: 1124k (+38%) + CSA exurbs: 18k (+11%)
ATX: 962k (+22%) + MSA suburbs: 1322k (+43%)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2430  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2023, 6:15 AM
Werdman89 Werdman89 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 86
It is almost 100% related to how unaffordable Austin has become. That was always Austin's primary selling point for headquarter relocations/significant investments in the city. As our City Council passes land use reforms that will help affordability, I expect HQ relocations to start back up again.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2431  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2023, 9:36 PM
JoninATX JoninATX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The ATX
Posts: 3,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Werdman89 View Post
It is almost 100% related to how unaffordable Austin has become. That was always Austin's primary selling point for headquarter relocations/significant investments in the city. As our City Council passes land use reforms that will help affordability, I expect HQ relocations to start back up again.
It passed early today!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2432  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2023, 2:10 AM
enragedcamel enragedcamel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 486
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoninATX View Post
It passed early today!
Do you happen to have links?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2433  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2023, 2:55 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver
Posts: 5,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by enragedcamel View Post
Do you happen to have links?
https://www.austintexas.gov/news/aus...dments-phase-1

https://www.kvue.com/amp/article/mon...8-081802475931

Alison Alter and Kelly were opposed.

https://www.austintexas.gov/news/aus...dments-phase-1

The act:

Quote:
Allowing up to three units: Increasing the number of homes allowed on single-family lots to three units, giving homeowners the ability to provide on-site housing options to family members, a caregiver, or earn additional income.

Including Tiny Homes: Making it easier to install a tiny home, an accessible and affordable way to add a small house to a property.

Creating Preservation and Sustainability Bonuses: Incentivize saving existing homes that conserve neighborhood character and help keep materials out of area landfills.

Encouraging the Creation of Smaller Homes: Regulates the size and scale of houses while promoting smaller “starter homes” for homebuyers. *****
It also removes the unrelated adult occupancy provision from code, which has a sordid anti-gay history.

Quote:
The amendments apply to Austin properties zoned as Single-Family Residence Large Lot (SF-1), Single-Family Residence Standard Lot (SF-2), and Family Residence (SF-3).
****This only applies when a property owner takes advantage of three units.*****

https://publicinput.com/Customer/Fil...6-38aece503fc0

Quote:
(a) no unit may exceed the greater of .4 FAR or 2,300 sq. ft.
(b) the FAR for 2 of the 3 units may not exceed the greater of 5 or 2,900 sq. ft.
(c) the max FAR for the site may not exceed the greater of .65 or 3,750 sq. ft.
These are generous square footages and FARs and could result in 6-12 beds per redeveloped lot without a smaller minimum lot size and 12-24 beds if lots can be subdivided if the new minimum lot size passes. Combined with the off street parking reform and housing on commercial lots, we could finally see a small wave of missing middle. Maybe. We still also need loads more towers, more corridor mixed-use, more apartments, and more suburban development as well. We need more of everything. Loads more.

I’d also argue that the real value of these reforms is NOT with redevelopment, but with new developments taking advantage of the new rules on the periphery on whatever land happens to be in city limits. Unfortunately, this does not apply to places like Dog’s Head and the McNeil tract, although future developers might take note and adjust their plans accordingly. Both of those tracts need to end up within the city limits, but the state’s annexation reforms a few years ago makes that difficult.
__________________
HTOWN: 2305k (+10%) + MSA suburbs: 4818k (+26%) + CSA exurbs: 190k (+6%)
BIGD: 1304k (+9%) + MSA div. suburbs: 3826k (+26%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 394k (+8%)
FTW: 919k (+24%) + MSA div. suburbs: 1589k (+14%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 90k (+12%)
SATX: 1435k (+8%) + MSA suburbs: 1124k (+38%) + CSA exurbs: 18k (+11%)
ATX: 962k (+22%) + MSA suburbs: 1322k (+43%)

Last edited by wwmiv; Dec 11, 2023 at 3:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2434  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2023, 2:17 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,485
I didn't realize Dog's Head wasn't already part of the city limits. Makes perfect sense now, of course....all around it and the river itself are part of the city limits already, if Google Maps is accurate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2435  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2023, 4:10 AM
Werdman89 Werdman89 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 86
Austin has the greatest GDP growth of any large American metro since 2019.
https://x.com/JosephPolitano/status/...664285501?s=20
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2436  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2023, 8:47 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Does anyone have a link to the language of the Austin HOME initiative? (the actual code) Or did they have to pass it before we can read it? Code Next had certain zip codes that did not allow for building multiple housing units, is the AHI similar?

Is this it perhaps?
https://www.speakupaustin.org/v1473
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2437  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2023, 8:57 PM
Werdman89 Werdman89 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAM View Post
Does anyone have a link to the language of the Austin HOME initiative? (the actual code) Or did they have to pass it before we can read it? Code Next had certain zip codes that did not allow for building multiple housing units, is the AHI similar?
Final language is currently being worked on due to amendments related to HOME. No zip codes will be excluded but HOME will not override deed restrictions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2438  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2023, 9:15 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Werdman89 View Post
Final language is currently being worked on due to amendments related to HOME. No zip codes will be excluded but HOME will not override deed restrictions.
There is some language at that link in my prior post - lower right, 2nd pdf file down. Happen to know if this new code eliminates the concept of a guest house?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2439  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2023, 11:37 PM
ATX2030 ATX2030 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 811
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2440  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2023, 3:15 AM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATX2030 View Post
Gotta be more descriptive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:20 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.