HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


524 Howard Street in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • San Francisco Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
San Francisco Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2018, 9:17 PM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by timbad View Post
<-- that was Aug 2013, so three years would have been pretty soon, but socketsite blurbs again. two more years. sigh.
<-- that was Apr 2016, so two years would have been pretty soon, but socketsite blurbs again. two more years. sigh.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted May 15, 2019, 9:14 PM
slock slock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 383
It's not 100% clear from the article, but it looks like this project as designed and approved won't be happening.

The Registry (subscription) had an item about this that stated the project was just purchased from Crescent Heights and was being combined with the adjacent building.

It's separate from the 540 Howard design we've seen, but here's a quote: "The buyers, who are the owners of the neighboring 530 Howard building, intend to combine the two parcels for greater efficiency and advance an appropriate design for one of the final significant developments in the neighborhood."

https://news.theregistrysf.com/524-h...stor-for-78mm/

Last edited by slock; May 16, 2019 at 2:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted May 15, 2019, 10:51 PM
mt_climber13 mt_climber13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,287
Damn was so excited for this. Another squat box instead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2019, 12:52 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Planning says an approved 48-story project at 524 Howard that would have included 334 dwelling units will likely not move forward as its approvals sunset this November.
https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfranc...and-macys.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2019, 7:50 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
socketsite blurbs again

Quote:
... Crescent Heights ... has quietly sold the parcel ...

And with that in mind, ... American West Parking is now seeking authorization to continue to operate the “temporary” Transbay District parking lot for (at least) another two years.
woohoooooo!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2020, 9:05 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
socketsite

Quote:
San Francisco’s Planning Commission is expected to approve the fifth extension, which would allow the “temporary” parking lot to continue to operate through September of 2022, this week.

At the same time, the entitlements for the 495-foot-tall tower have now technically expired as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2022, 6:25 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,758
Any updates on this one?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2022, 5:25 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,758
Looks like this one remains in limbo.

Quote:
Approved Tower Pushed Back, Parking Lot Extension Sought
August 26, 2022

... with the entitlements for the 495-foot-tall tower having technically expired, an application to secure a sixth two-year extension for the “temporary” parking lot, which would run through the third quarter of 2024, has been filed with Planning. At the same time, building permits for the tower have yet to be requested. We’ll continue to keep you posted and plugged-in.
https://socketsite.com/archives/2022...on-sought.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2022, 5:27 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,758
A reminder of what could've been.



https://socketsite.com/archives/2022...on-sought.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2022, 5:54 PM
Iceman12 Iceman12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 40
Such a shame. At what point do we create a use it or lose it policy?

Separately, anyone have a clue what's going on with Parcel F (next door)? I biked by this weekend and it's still a pile of rubble. Hines is out getting approvals for several other parcels, but this continues to stay untouched.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2022, 6:11 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,075
It would be cool if someday something could rise here along with Parcel F.

That'll be if SF ever builds a skyscraper again... there's plenty of demand but for some reason no execution.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 8:54 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,758
Back from the dead! Mods, can we update the thread title to reflect the new address and specs?

Should be "SAN FRANCISCO | 530 Howard St | 840 FT | 71 Floors".

The updated specs:
- 71 floors, 840 ft
- 672 units
- At least 10% of the units will be affordable
- Parking included for cars and bicycles

Quote:
Plans Surface For 71-Story Residential Tower In SoMa, San Francisco



BY: ANDREW NELSON 5:30 AM ON NOVEMBER 16, 2023

Bayhill Ventures has announced plans for a new skyscraper at 530 Howard Street, overlooking San Francisco’s Salesforce Park. Initial plans shared with media this morning suggest the tower would stand 840 feet tall, making it the third tallest structure in the city skyline if built today and the second tallest in the city’s pipeline. Bayhill Ventures is a relatively new firm led by the former chief at Hines, Paul Paradis, and former president of the Sobrato Organization, Rob Hollister.

The current application will rise 840 feet to create 672 for lease apartments. Unit sizes are expected to vary between one- to three-bedrooms. At least ten percent will be designated as affordable. Parking will be included for cars and bicycles, while residents will enjoy nearly 30,000 square feet of amenity space.

...

Pickard Chilton is responsible for the design of 530 Howard Street. Renderings show the slim tower rising from the five-story podium, with a four-floor-high cantilevered amenity terrace facing the pedestrian bridge connecting the public to Transbay Park via an elevator. The facade appears to be treated with bold horizontal lines established by steel beams between each floor, while metal panels represent pilasters rising up to the 840-foot-high parapet.

Today, a surface parking lot and a four-story office building occupy the project site. Crescent Heights had pursued plans in 2016 for a 48-story mixed-use tower with 350 units. The Handel Architects-designed apartments never materialized, and over the years, its most common permit activity regarded the temporary parking lot’s two-year lease renewals.
https://sfyimby.com/2023/11/plans-su...francisco.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 8:56 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 8,758
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 9:11 PM
gochujang gochujang is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 48
Nice. Expecting to see every dead office proposal rebirth itself as all residential.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2023, 9:41 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,075
Awesome news, the design could be more interesting but still cool
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2023, 1:45 AM
deanstirrat deanstirrat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 40
Thing is huge. I love it. Build now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2023, 2:02 AM
twinpeaks twinpeaks is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 225
Cool, I hope this breezes through permitting into construction. We need many more mixed types of housing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2023, 3:02 AM
dktshb's Avatar
dktshb dktshb is offline
Environmental Sabotage
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Francisco/ Los Angeles/ Tahoe
Posts: 5,053
Looks very nice and connected to the neighborhood at street and park level, which is the most important to me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2023, 5:01 AM
whitty whitty is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by twinpeaks View Post
Cool, I hope this breezes through permitting into construction. We need many more mixed types of housing
It should in theory go very, very quickly:

https://www.sfchronicle.com/realesta...l-18488629.php

Quote:
While the sleek tower would be a distinctive presence on the skyline, it also represents a significant milestone in San Francisco’s political landscape: the first major downtown tower that would not require approvals from the Planning Commission or the Board of Supervisors.

That’s because the developer is taking advantage of Assembly Bill 2011, the “affordable housing and high road jobs act of 2022,” which allows “ministerial” approval of certain developments on commercially zoned properties.

The law has not been enacted much in San Francisco — there is only one other AB2011 project pending — because it only applies to streets that are a minimum of 75 feet wide. Most thoroughfares in San Francisco are significantly narrower than that, but Howard Street is not. AB2011 also requires that the sites not be next to industrial properties and be more than 500 feet from a freeway.

“It will be the first major project that is utilizing state ministerial approval process — no (California Environmental Quality Act) study, nor a hearing at the Planning Commission,” said San Francisco Planning Director Rich Hillis.

Hillis said the design will be reviewed by planning staff to make sure it complies with the city’s code requirements, but that it should be ready for building permits within six months. After entitlements are secured, the developer expects to spend about a year raising capital and an additional three years building the tower.

Mayor London Breed celebrated the proposed project as a “significant investment” in downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2023, 5:05 AM
Charmy2 Charmy2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 353
In that first photo homebucket posted imagine this beast standing alongside Parcel F, the Oceanwide, 50 Main Street, and Block 4. Really gets me excited to say the very least.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:05 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.