HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #481  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2021, 2:52 AM
dc_denizen's Avatar
dc_denizen dc_denizen is offline
Selfie-stick vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York Suburbs
Posts: 10,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doady View Post
What do you mean? The urbanity of Calgary isn't no different than other 90% post-war urban areas?

I don't understand what urbanity means if it has nothing to do walkability, and transit usage has nothing to do with people's ability to walk to and from transit stops. Would Calgary's downtown be no different if everyone drove and parked downtown instead of taking transit? Washington DC is one of the leaders in transit as well. Does transit really have nothing to do the development of Tyson's Corner and the future redevelopment of the parking lots there?

I don't understand why there's so much efforts to separate urbanity and high density and transit and walkability all from each other. Maybe the links between is just all in my head and not real. It just makes me realize I don't belong in this thread. Sorry for wasting everyone's time with all my stupid posts and ideas, I won't bother you guys with them again.
I think you can have different kinds of urbanity that are not as dependent on transit to develop.

eg in DC a lot of the TODs are self-contained urban villages. Most of the inhabitants actually own and use cars to get to work or go farther afield to different parts of the urban area. But many services/amenities are very close by (short drive or a walk).

Location next to transit is a massive selling point though (see: TOD proposals by the silver line) and help concentrate developments and amenities, but I am not surprised (having lived in areas like this) that ridership is relatively poor given the system size.

Dallas and Houston has clusters too but with no transit lines to channel the investments, you end up higher density pockets strewn all around the metro area.

The issue with your analysis is you seem to dismiss the fact that high density living can exist without much in the way of transit.
__________________
Joined the bus on the 33rd seat
By the doo-doo room with the reek replete
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #482  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2021, 4:19 AM
Double L's Avatar
Double L Double L is offline
Houston:Considered Good
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,846
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Impressive cluster but would this not be considered part of Houston proper? More of a midtown than a suburban centre. Also are there any rapid transit links between downtown Houston and this hub?
Yes, it is a part of Houston proper and there is a light rail that connects it to downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #483  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2021, 5:15 PM
Maldive's Avatar
Maldive Maldive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,212
One solution to a sea of parking lots…

A recently released future rendering of Vaughn Metropolitan Centre north of Toronto, which includes CG Tower now u/c at 189m/60 storeys (red). Four of the towers near the right side of the render are built or topped out with more in the earlier stages of construction such as the 4 tower (40s to 59s) Festival Condo development.

UT
CG Tower

UT

SmartCentres’ 175 Millway - 64 storey/206m residential and 21 storey office building.

UT

UT
Claude Cormier park design.

claudecormier.com
__________________
circa 2008: home of the 3rd best skyline in N.A. +++ circa 2028: home of the 2nd best skyline in N.A. (T-Dot)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #484  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2021, 11:02 PM
dc_denizen's Avatar
dc_denizen dc_denizen is offline
Selfie-stick vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York Suburbs
Posts: 10,999
well here is tysons at full build-out

http://intysons.com/wp-content/uploa...nsBuildOut.gif

__________________
Joined the bus on the 33rd seat
By the doo-doo room with the reek replete
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #485  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2021, 11:12 PM
Hudson11's Avatar
Hudson11 Hudson11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,040
and one of those will be the tallest in the State and the DC Metro Area.



__________________
click here too see hunser's list of the many supertall skyscrapers of New York City!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #486  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2021, 4:33 PM
nito nito is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nite View Post
If the GTA had to hold off development until transit was there, nothing would get built. it's better to develop as much as possible and force politicians hands when the need for transit is obvious. The federal government is planning on billions more for transit funding in the next few years which should help get the hamilton LRT built and the relief line in Toronto. In any case Transit round the GTA have been getting continually better for a couple of decades now and I expect more in the coming decades
That sounds like a pretty big gamble to take; if the transit doesn’t materialise; you’ll end up with high-density neighbourhood islands with poor connectivity, that doesn’t sound a sensible strategy. Out of curiosity do developers in Canada not have obligations to provide support for their projects?


Quote:
Originally Posted by memph View Post
It has a 6 lane freeway, 6 lane boulevard, streetcar and 4 lane road all passing through East-West. Miami's beach front condo communities have less than half that infrastructure. And adding a stop on an existing commuter rail line isn't that much of a big deal, it definitely can be done if the need arises.
Roads aren’t terribly efficient at moving large volumes of people; it’s why we have trains. There are similarities with Miami Beach with regards to adequate transit, but in defence of Miami Beach it does have an older urban grain supporting a cohesive pedestrian experience, in some ways resembling some European towns and cities. Humber Bay by the looks of it is a slice of suburbia mixed with former industrial lands, and towers in parks. Hop across the Gardiner Expressway and there is a giant wholesale market and water treatment plant.
__________________
London Transport Thread updated: 2023_07_12 | London Stadium & Arena Thread updated: 2022_03_09
London General Update Thread updated: 2019_04_03 | High Speed 2 updated: 2021_09_24
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #487  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2021, 4:53 PM
Nite's Avatar
Nite Nite is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by nito View Post
That sounds like a pretty big gamble to take; if the transit doesn’t materialise; you’ll end up with high-density neighbourhood islands with poor connectivity, that doesn’t sound a sensible strategy. Out of curiosity do developers in Canada not have obligations to provide support for their projects?


Roads aren’t terribly efficient at moving large volumes of people; it’s why we have trains. There are similarities with Miami Beach with regards to adequate transit, but in defence of Miami Beach it does have an older urban grain supporting a cohesive pedestrian experience, in some ways resembling some European towns and cities. Humber Bay by the looks of it is a slice of suburbia mixed with former industrial lands, and towers in parks. Hop across the Gardiner Expressway and there is a giant wholesale market and water treatment plant.

I don't see how it's a gamble, all areas in Toronto have good frequent bus service, if the demand increase bus service will increase, and if demand increases even more then the street becomes a target for lrt, finch and eglinton are the best examples right now, both streets have insane bus coverage, like every 5 minute and both are being upgraded to LRT. The province and federal government both plan to spend a lot in this decade on transit as well, and Toronto is ripe for more transit lines. The cities outside of Toronto are also upgrading their transit systems, most notable a new LRT for mississauga to go along with it's BRT transitway and York Region improving it's BRT system.

Last edited by Nite; Mar 5, 2021 at 5:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #488  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2021, 11:39 PM
memph memph is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by nito View Post
That sounds like a pretty big gamble to take; if the transit doesn’t materialise; you’ll end up with high-density neighbourhood islands with poor connectivity, that doesn’t sound a sensible strategy. Out of curiosity do developers in Canada not have obligations to provide support for their projects?
They have pretty high development charges (aka impact fees) at least compared to the US. Currently they're $33,000-$51,000 depending on the size of the condo unit. There can also be additional obligations especially as a concession when the developer requires zoning changes to be made. That's what happened in the case of the Christie Factory development at the Humber Bay Shores, it got approved in exchange for the developer paying for the cost of the new GO station.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nito View Post
Roads aren’t terribly efficient at moving large volumes of people; it’s why we have trains. There are similarities with Miami Beach with regards to adequate transit, but in defence of Miami Beach it does have an older urban grain supporting a cohesive pedestrian experience, in some ways resembling some European towns and cities. Humber Bay by the looks of it is a slice of suburbia mixed with former industrial lands, and towers in parks. Hop across the Gardiner Expressway and there is a giant wholesale market and water treatment plant.
I was thinking mostly of North Beach, Bal Harbor, Sunny Isles Beach, Hollywood Beach, etc.

Anyways, this street is the only way out of this 7 tower community in a different part of Toronto and there's no traffic jams.
https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.77783...7i16384!8i8192
Humber Bay has much more and bigger roads, so they should be able to handle a fair bit. Now - some of those roads are pretty heavily used, especially the Gardiner, but a lot of that traffic is coming from further away. It would still be preferable to have people driving shorter distances from Humber Bay than a much longer distance from new subdivisions in Milton or Oakville.

And as I said, they have streetcar + bus service, and it's a reasonably walkable area with retail in the base of many of the buildings:
https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.62308...7i16384!8i8192
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #489  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2021, 3:04 AM
Nite's Avatar
Nite Nite is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,992
Drone Flight
Yonge and Eglinton - Toronto - Oct 2020


Video Link

Last edited by Nite; Mar 8, 2021 at 3:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #490  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2021, 3:33 AM
Nite's Avatar
Nite Nite is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,992
Drone Flight
Humber Bay - Toronto - Sept 2020


Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #491  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2021, 2:51 PM
nito nito is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nite View Post
I don't see how it's a gamble, all areas in Toronto have good frequent bus service, if the demand increase bus service will increase, and if demand increases even more then the street becomes a target for lrt
Buses and trams are great, but they are ill suited to form the core mode of transit for high-density areas; the exception being pedestrian orientated areas. It is why countless cities across the globe have developed high-capacity and/or frequent railway systems to facilitate movement to/from such areas.

Quote:
Originally Posted by memph View Post
They have pretty high development charges (aka impact fees) at least compared to the US. Currently they're $33,000-$51,000 depending on the size of the condo unit. There can also be additional obligations especially as a concession when the developer requires zoning changes to be made. That's what happened in the case of the Christie Factory development at the Humber Bay Shores, it got approved in exchange for the developer paying for the cost of the new GO station.
What happens if the developer doesn’t build the station? I was curious and couldn’t find an opening date, and it does beg the question why the station wasn’t built first noting the existing and recently completed residential developments. I just find it fascinating from an urban planning perspective.

Quote:
Originally Posted by memph View Post
I was thinking mostly of North Beach, Bal Harbor, Sunny Isles Beach, Hollywood Beach, etc.
I’d agree with you on these areas as demonstrating the same problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by memph View Post
Anyways, this street is the only way out of this 7 tower community in a different part of Toronto and there's no traffic jams. https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.77783...7i16384!8i8192
This does not look like a pleasant place! Bordered by railways on two sides yet the nearest station is a 20-minute walk, and a 12-lane highway on another side. The local bus appears to be every half-hour and pedestrian access to neighbouring areas for amenities and employment is restricted to the same solitary road in and out. Graveyards look like they have more activity going on!

Quote:
Originally Posted by memph View Post
Humber Bay has much more and bigger roads, so they should be able to handle a fair bit. Now - some of those roads are pretty heavily used, especially the Gardiner, but a lot of that traffic is coming from further away. It would still be preferable to have people driving shorter distances from Humber Bay than a much longer distance from new subdivisions in Milton or Oakville. And as I said, they have streetcar + bus service, and it's a reasonably walkable area with retail in the base of many of the buildings:
https://www.google.ca/maps/@43.62308...7i16384!8i8192
Cars have their place as a mode of transport, but they are ill suited to facilitating large volumes of people in high density environments. Even with the sheer volume of lanes, it is the unwelcoming pedestrian experience, the noise, the pollution.
__________________
London Transport Thread updated: 2023_07_12 | London Stadium & Arena Thread updated: 2022_03_09
London General Update Thread updated: 2019_04_03 | High Speed 2 updated: 2021_09_24
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #492  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2021, 9:16 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,347
Suburban Vancouver taken by me yesterday.

Part of the Victoria Hill skyline in New West looking east.


Uptown New West with Burnaby in the background.


Uptown New West in the foreground looking west with Burnaby in the back middle and downtown Vancouver on the far right.


Burnaby and Coquitlam looking north.


New West with Burnaby and Coquitlam in the background.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #493  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2021, 4:34 AM
memph memph is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,854
Quote:
Originally Posted by nito View Post
Buses and trams are great, but they are ill suited to form the core mode of transit for high-density areas; the exception being pedestrian orientated areas. It is why countless cities across the globe have developed high-capacity and/or frequent railway systems to facilitate movement to/from such areas.

What happens if the developer doesn’t build the station? I was curious and couldn’t find an opening date, and it does beg the question why the station wasn’t built first noting the existing and recently completed residential developments. I just find it fascinating from an urban planning perspective.
Ultimately, what this comes down to is that Toronto is a rapidly growing metropolitan area that's playing catch up on transit infrastructure. So it's still better to build high density where there is some frequent transit infrastructure and potential for further expansion, than it is to have the housing get built in some outer suburb or even in the form of condos in a more auto-oriented area where the prospects for rapid transit expansion are more distant (ex Erin Mills, Promenade Mall, Vaughan Mills or even Yonge & Steeles or Uptown Oakville).

The transit capacity of the streetcar routes serving the area is actually pretty high. The commuter rail line passing through currently has a weekday ridership of 33,500. Meanwhile, the King Street transit corridor (streetcars/buses) was serving about 85,000 people prior to the pandemic.

During the earlier stages of the community's development, the plan was to upgrade the streetcar to higher capacity Waterfront West LRT with a dedicated ROW (2007 Transit City plan). That got put on the backburner when Rob Ford took office in 2010, since he was opposed to LRTs, and the Waterfront West LRT wasn't even among the highest priority LRT lines.

On the other hand, Metrolinx has been pushing forward with upgrading its commuter rail corridor (Lakeshore West) through there, buying up control of the corridor from the freight rail company that previously owned it, adding a third track and upgrading frequencies. So it's only been relatively recently that adding a station here has been seen as a realistic alternative to the LRT proposal.

While building a station is still much cheaper than building a new rapid transit line, it looks like they're still expecting a price tag of $60m, probably because it would begin under the Gardiner Expressway, then continue over Park Lawn Road and Mimico Creek, so building over those obstacles while minimizing disruptions to traffic and rail service is probably somewhat complicated. So that explains why Metrolinx has been kind of kicking that can down the road and why it would've been too much to ask of the developers of the 3-4 tower projects to pay for it. But for the developer of this 7500 unit + 1.2m sf commercial space development, I suppose that's a more realistic concession, especially since I think they required more significant re-zonings that the other developments.

Also I believe the train station was required as a pre-condition for the development to go ahead. The project hasn't been approved yet, so it might take another 6-7 years for the first residents to move in. The train station is still in the environmental assessment stage.

Until then, the city of Toronto converted the downtown portion of King Street into a transit mall, which lead to a significant improvement in travel times and capacity for those streetcars (this is the same route that serves Humber Bay Shores) and Toronto has also been buying higher capacity light rail vehicles for their streetcar network.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nito View Post
I’d agree with you on these areas as demonstrating the same problem.

This does not look like a pleasant place! Bordered by railways on two sides yet the nearest station is a 20-minute walk, and a 12-lane highway on another side. The local bus appears to be every half-hour and pedestrian access to neighbouring areas for amenities and employment is restricted to the same solitary road in and out. Graveyards look like they have more activity going on!

Cars have their place as a mode of transport, but they are ill suited to facilitating large volumes of people in high density environments. Even with the sheer volume of lanes, it is the unwelcoming pedestrian experience, the noise, the pollution.
My point was that even with an relatively auto-oriented community of 7 condo towers, 1 large office building, 1 large hotel, and a few blocks of rowhouses, that's not enough to create a traffic jam on the one exit point (even though it's just a small 2 lane street). That street probably wouldn't be able to handle too much more development though, Liberty Village would be an example of a bigger community that also has limited exit points and it gets pretty congested during peak periods. The Kennedy bus comes every 5-10 minutes though, maybe you were looking at the 3am schedule because you're in a distant time zone?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #494  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2021, 10:27 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by isotack View Post
Do you ever post your own photos? Because you to post everyone else's.
Including mine a few pages back.
You've been Isotacked.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #495  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2021, 4:45 PM
Nite's Avatar
Nite Nite is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,992
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #496  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2021, 4:54 PM
Nite's Avatar
Nite Nite is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,992
Metrotown Burnaby - Greater Vancouver


Metrotown reflections
by D70, on Flickr


Metrotown Burnaby
by Peter, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #497  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2021, 7:34 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,903
Burnaby Lake or Deer Lake?
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #498  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2021, 7:48 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,804
Burrard Inlet!

I think the tall hill in back is Lummi Island on the US side.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #499  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2021, 7:51 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays View Post
Burrard Inlet!

I think the tall hill in back is Lummi Island on the US side.

That first shot isn't Burrard Inlet. It looks very much like a freshwater small lake.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #500  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2021, 8:07 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,804
My mistake! I was only seeing the second shot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:48 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.