Quote:
Originally Posted by Brainpathology
Aurora is where failures move when they want to tell tell their friends who don't know any better that they live in Denver. It's Denver's Oakland.
|
As someone who lives in the East Bay and works in Oakland, I take that as an insult to put Oakland at the level of Aurora.
Despite it having a stigma that I think is even stronger outside the Bay Area than inside, Oakland has a lot going for it. It has more BART stations per capita than San Francisco, including three underground stations downtown, and it's far more functional than a measly suburban-to-suburban LRT line. Parts of Oakland are just as vibrant (and almost just as gentrified) as San Francisco. Denver would kill to have neighborhoods like Oakland's Temescal, Rockridge, Lake Merritt, and Jack London Square. Oakland has a very real downtown that has a lot more potential infill capacity than San Francisco, and it is far from having Aurora's problem of having to artificially construct a city center. Oh, and last time I checked, Aurora doesn't have three pro sports teams of its own either.
A far better analogue to Aurora would be Concord. That truly is the Bay Area's armpit, and it's just as hopelessly suburban as Aurora.
Now to keep this on-topic, here's some real transit for you. Timed transfers of trains with a capacity of 2,000 passengers each and a top speed of 80 mph, all meeting in uptown Oakland:
• Video Link