HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1921  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2012, 2:23 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by San Francisco Chronicle

MTC approves Caltrain electrification plan
Michael Cabanatuan
San Francisco Chronicle
Thursday, March 29, 2012

Regional transportation officials approved an agreement Wednesday to work with the High-Speed Rail Authority to electrify Caltrain, transforming the 149-year-old commuter line into a modern railroad capable of carrying more riders and accommodating high-speed trains.

The Metropolitan Transportation Commission approved the regional pact, which outlines a $1.5 billion plan to electrify Caltrain, install an advanced train-control system, and replace its fleet of rail cars using a combination of high-speed rail bond money and local, regional and state transportation funds.

The work could be done before 2019, said Caltrain Chief Executive Officer Michael Scanlon.

"This is a historic day," he said. "It provides the framework for high-speed rail to proceed in a reasonable, pragmatic and, I believe, enlightened way. And it will provide for the long-planned and long-needed improvements to modernize Caltrain."

The "blended system," suggested by a group of Peninsula legislators a year ago, is part of a new approach to building a high-speed rail link between San Francisco and Los Angeles. In addition to starting construction of the system in the Central Valley late this year or early next year, it calls for investing in commuter railroads in the Bay Area and Los Angeles so they can become part of the fast-train network.

The strategy is designed to combat criticism of the rail authority's earlier approach, viewed by many, particularly on the Peninsula, as heavy-handed and unresponsive. High-speed rail officials also hope it will temper criticism of the system's initial 130-mile stretch between Chowchilla and Bakersfield as "a train to nowhere," and concerns that the state's bond could produce nothing more than an isolated set of tracks.
Read More: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...BAER1NRJTU.DTL
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1922  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2012, 3:08 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Los Angeles Times

L.A. leaders back revised bullet-train business plan
The new plan cuts $30 billion off the cost by using existing regional passenger line tracks in some areas rather than building new tracks.
By Ari Bloomekatz, Los Angeles Times
April 3, 2012

Several Los Angeles leaders backed a revised business plan released Monday by the agency overseeing California's ambitious high-speed rail effort, saying it lowers costs and speeds construction while bringing jobs and world-class transit to the region.

By embracing a "blended" approach, the plan shaves $30 billion off the cost by using some tracks that now carry regional passenger lines rather than building new ones exclusively for the bullet train.

"High-speed rail is the natural extension of the transportation network we are building in Southern California," said L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. "When it comes to transportation infrastructure, connectivity is key."

If the plan is approved, construction would begin this year on a 300-mile stretch of electrified rail connecting Merced in the Central Valley to the San Fernando Valley within 10 years. An earlier draft included only a 130-mile portion of that.

Eventually, the line would extend from Southern California, through several cities in the Central Valley, to the Bay Area.

Even with the $30-billion reduction, the projected $68.4-billion effort is $25 billion more than the original price tag.

Officials with the California High-Speed Rail Authority said Monday that construction of the entire 520-mile system would be completed in 2028. It would open to the public in 2029.

Supporters of the revised plan included Gary Toebben, president of the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce, and union groups that have long backed building a high-speed rail system because of the jobs it would provide.

"This plan will propel the high-speed rail project forward while going back to basics — let's put people to work to build much-needed transportation networks, and let's do it fast," said Robbie Hunter of the Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building & Construction Trades Council.
Read More: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...,2079915.story
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1923  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2012, 3:21 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by VEGAS INC



DesertXpress inks deal to add train link from Victorville to Palmdale, making travel to L.A. possible
By Richard N. Velotta (contact)
Thursday, 7 June 2012, 10:54 a.m.

A seamless high-speed rail system linking Las Vegas with downtown Los Angeles is the goal adopted today by representatives of DesertXpress and the Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority.

DesertXpress Enterprises already is trying to build a high-speed rail line between Las Vegas and Victorville, Calif. A new agreement signed today makes possible a second leg, linking Victorville to Palmdale, Calif., and eventually Los Angeles.

DesertXpress and MTA representatives signed documents that open the door to the Las Vegas-Los Angeles route. The agreement includes a strategy to plan and build a 50-mile high-speed line between Victorville and Palmdale, which would initially connect to Metrolink tracks and eventually be the connection point to California’s planned high-speed rail system.

The DesertXpress plan is part of a larger strategy envisioned by the Las Vegas-centered Western High Speed Rail Alliance to eventually tie into a regional high-speed rail network with routes to Phoenix, Salt Lake City and Denver.
Read More: http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2012/ju...-victorville-/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1924  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2012, 3:41 AM
StethJeff's Avatar
StethJeff StethJeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by dragonsky View Post
As long as the ride is <3 hours, people will definitely consider this possibility rather than driving.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1925  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2012, 11:21 PM
yakumoto's Avatar
yakumoto yakumoto is offline
I enjoy discussing issues
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MEGATITS
Posts: 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eriu View Post
That still doesn't cover Sacramento to San Francisco, which is what I was excited about (not that Sacramento to Anahiem in hour hours wouldnt be awesome too). Sure, I can take Amtrack to Emeryville and then a taxi into SF, but that would take just as long as driving and would be a lot more expensive.

If I could get to SF in less than an hour for not too much cash, I'd be making that trip probably once a month just to be all touristy.
Taxi? Why not just take BART?
__________________
San Jose: God's gift to Urban Enthusiasts
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1926  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2012, 3:23 PM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132


Quote:
Originally Posted by Los Angeles Times

Vote on high-speed rail called 'big win' for California
July 7, 2012 | 7:53 am
Chris Megerian and Ralph Vartabedian
Los Angeles Times

The state Senate vote authorizing initial funding for California's high-speed rail project was hailed by backers Friday as a pivotal step in building the controversial project.

U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, who had made repeated trips and telephone calls to California to push for the project, called the vote a "big win" for the state.

"No economy can grow faster than its transportation network allows," LaHood said in a statement. "With highways between California cities congested and airspace at a premium, Californians desperately need an alternative."

It is unclear when construction on the largest infrastructure project in the country can begin. The state still needs a series of regulatory approvals to start the first 130 miles of track in the Central Valley. The plan also faces lawsuits by agriculture interests and potential opposition by major freight railroads.

But proponents rejoiced at Friday's razor-thin 21-16 vote, which allocates roughly $8 billion for the first segment of track and related projects. Barring insurmountable obstacles, Californians eventually will be able to ride a bullet train — traveling as fast as 220 mph — between Los Angeles and San Francisco rather than fly or drive on aging highways.

"The Legislature took bold action today that gets Californians back to work and puts California out in front once again," Gov. Jerry Brown said in a statement. The governor has been promoting the project since taking office in 2011 and is expected to sign the funding bill.

Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento), who was under intense pressure to round up votes in support of the plan, called Friday "a turning point in California, a time when we decided to say yes to hope, yes to progress, yes to the future."
Read More: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lano...alifornia.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1927  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2012, 2:01 PM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1928  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2012, 2:32 PM
Eco_jt's Avatar
Eco_jt Eco_jt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 114
any update on this project? It's really exciting to see California leading the way on HSR.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1929  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2012, 1:55 AM
gozilla gozilla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 43
I'm glad California is moving forward with this. Can't wait to ride your high speed trains when it's finished even if it's not as fast as Europe's, Japan's or China's HSTs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1930  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2013, 9:27 PM
L1011driver L1011driver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by gozilla View Post
I'm glad California is moving forward with this. Can't wait to ride your high speed trains when it's finished even if it's not as fast as Europe's, Japan's or China's HSTs.
No reason it shouldn't be as fast, as long as they stick with the plan of making all the track dedicated to the HSR. Then the sky is the limit. The one thing Amtraks Acela proved, is that it needs it's own tracks to reach it's full potential. Just like the Shinkansen and TGV.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1931  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2013, 2:42 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1932  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2013, 2:12 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Video Link


Quote:
Originally Posted by New York Times

Speedy Trains Transform China
Timothy O'Rourke for The New York Times
By KEITH BRADSHER
Published: September 23, 2013

CHANGSHA, China — The cavernous rail station here for China’s new high-speed trains was nearly deserted when it opened less than four years ago.

Not anymore. Practically every train is sold out, although they leave for cities all over the country every several minutes. Long lines snake back from ticket windows under the 50-foot ceiling of white, gently undulating steel that floats cloudlike over the departure hall. An ambitious construction program will soon nearly double the size of the 16-platform station.

Just five years after China’s high-speed rail system opened, it is carrying nearly twice as many passengers each month as the country’s domestic airline industry. With traffic growing 28 percent a year for the last several years, China’s high-speed rail network will handle more passengers by early next year than the 54 million people a month who board domestic flights in the United States.

Li Xiaohung, a shoe factory worker, rides the 430-mile route from Guangzhou home to Changsha once a month to visit her daughter. Ms. Li used to see her daughter just once a year because the trip took a full day. Now she comes back in 2 hours 19 minutes.

Business executives like Zhen Qinan, a founder of the stock market in coastal Shenzhen, ride bullet trains to meetings all over China to avoid airport delays. The trains hurtle along at 186 miles an hour and are smooth, well-lighted, comfortable and almost invariably punctual, if not early. “I did not think it would change so quickly. High-speed trains seemed like a strange thing, but now it’s just part of our lives,” Mr. Zhen said.

China’s high-speed rail system has emerged as an unexpected success story. Economists and transportation experts cite it as one reason for China’s continued economic growth when other emerging economies are faltering. But it has not been without costs — high debt, many people relocated and a deadly accident. The corruption trials this summer of two former senior rail ministry officials have cast an unfavorable light on the bidding process for the rail lines.

The high-speed rail lines have, without a doubt, transformed China, often in unexpected ways.

For example, Chinese workers are now more productive. A paper for the World Bank by three consultants this year found that Chinese cities connected to the high-speed rail network, as more than 100 are already, are likely to experience broad growth in worker productivity. The productivity gains occur when companies find themselves within a couple of hours’ train ride of tens of millions of potential customers, employees and rivals.

“What we see very clearly is a change in the way a lot of companies are doing business,” said Gerald Ollivier, a World Bank senior transport specialist in Beijing.

Productivity gains to the economy appear to be of the same order as the combined economic gains from the usual arguments given for high-speed trains, including time savings for travelers, reduced noise, less air pollution and fuel savings, the World Bank consultants calculated.

Companies are opening research and development centers in more glamorous cities like Beijing and Shenzhen with abundant supplies of young, highly educated workers, and having them take frequent day trips to factories in cities with lower wages and land costs, like Tianjin and Changsha. Businesses are also customizing their products more through frequent meetings with clients in other cities, part of a broader move up the ladder toward higher value-added products.

Li Qingfu, the sales manager at the Changsha Don Lea Ramie Textile Technology Company, an exporter of women’s dresses and blouses, said he used to travel twice a year to Guangzhou, the commercial hub of southeastern China. The journey, similar in distance to traveling from Boston to Washington, required nearly a full day in each direction of winding up and down mountains by train or by car.

He now goes almost every month on the punctual bullet trains, which slice straight through the forested mountains and narrow valleys of southern Hunan province and northern Guangdong province in a little over two hours, traversing long tunnels and elevated concrete viaducts in rapid succession.

“More frequent access to my client base has allowed me to more quickly pick up on fashion changes in color and style. My orders have increased by 50 percent,” he said.

China relocated large numbers of families whose homes lay in the path of the tracks and quickly built new residential and commercial districts around high-speed train stations.

The new districts, typically located in inner suburbs, not downtown areas, have rapidly attracted large numbers of residents, partly because of China’s rapid urbanization. Enough farm families become city dwellers each year to fill New York City, part of a trend visible during a series of visits to the Changsha high-speed train station over the last four years.

When the station opened at the end of 2009 in an inner suburb full of faded state-owned factories, the neighborhood was initially silent. But by 2011, nearly 200 tower cranes could be counted building high-rises during the half-hour drive from downtown Changsha to the high-speed rail station. On a morning last month, only several dozen tower cranes were visible along nearly the same route. But a vibrant new area of apartment towers, commercial office buildings and hotels had opened near the train station.

China’s success may not be easily reproduced in the West, and not just because few places can match China’s pace of urbanization. China has four times the population of the United States, and the great bulk of its people live in the eastern third of the country, an area similar in size to the United States east of the Mississippi.

“Except for Boston to Washington, D.C., we don’t have the corridors” of high population density that China has, said C. William Ibbs, a professor of civil engineering at the University of California, Berkeley.

China’s high-speed rail program has been married to the world’s most ambitious subway construction program, as more than half the world’s large tunneling machines chisel away underneath big Chinese cities. That has meant easy access to high-speed rail stations for huge numbers of people — although the subway line to Changsha’s high-speed train station has been delayed after a deadly tunnel accident, a possible side effect of China’s haste.

New subway lines, rail lines and urban districts are part of China’s heavy dependence on investment-led growth. Despite repeated calls by Chinese leaders for a shift to more consumer-led growth, it shows little sign of changing. China’s new prime minister, Li Keqiang, publicly endorsed further expansion of the 5,900-mile high-speed rail network this summer. He said the country would invest $100 billion a year in its train system for years to come, mainly on high-speed rail.

The Chinese government is already struggling with nearly $500 billion in overall rail debt. Most of it was incurred for the high-speed rail system and financed with bank loans that must be rolled over as often as once a year. Using short-term loans made the financing look less risky on the balance sheets of the state-controlled banking system and held down borrowing costs. But the reliance on short-term credit has left the system vulnerable to any increase in interest rates.

“Even well-performing railways capable of covering their cash running costs and interest on their debt will almost certainly be unable to repay the principal without some long-term financing arrangements,” said a World Bank report last year.

Another impact: air travel. Train ridership has soared partly because China has set fares on high-speed rail lines at a little less than half of comparable airfares and then refrained from raising them. On routes that are four or five years old, prices have stayed the same as blue-collar wages have more than doubled. That has resulted in many workers, as well as business executives, switching to high-speed trains.

Airlines have largely halted service on routes of less than 300 miles when high-speed rail links open. They have reduced service on routes of 300 to 470 miles.

The double-digit annual wage increases give the Chinese enough disposable income that domestic airline traffic has still been growing 10 percent a year. That is the second-fastest growth among the world’s 10 largest domestic aviation markets, after India, which now faces a slowdown as the fall of the rupee has made aviation fuel exorbitantly expensive for air carriers there.

High-speed trains are not only allowing business managers from deep inside China to reach bigger markets. They are also prompting foreign executives to look deeper in China for suppliers as wages surge along the coast.

“We always used to have go down south to Guangzhou to meet with European clients, but now they come up to Changsha more often,” said Hwang Yin, a sales executive at the Changsha Qilu Import and Export Company.

The only drawback: “The high-speed trains are getting very crowded these days.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/24/bu...pagewanted=all
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1933  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2013, 9:10 PM
travis bickle travis bickle is offline
silly slackergeek
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 470
CA High Speed Rail DEAD...

Today a Sacramento judge dealt a death blow to the fraud that is California High Speed Rail...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-1...-by-judge.html

Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of liars.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1934  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2013, 12:20 AM
skyscraperfan23 skyscraperfan23 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 301
Quote:
Originally Posted by travis bickle View Post
Today a Sacramento judge dealt a death blow to the fraud that is California High Speed Rail...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-1...-by-judge.html

Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of liars.

thank god, Califorina HSR should have been derailed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1935  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2014, 6:08 PM
TexasRE's Avatar
TexasRE TexasRE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 126
As much as I like LRT, Commuter Rail & High Speed Rail, this gigantic project seems like a boondoggle. It could never pay for itself or even remotely cover hardly any of its expense, cost the state way too much money. There has to some type of justification to invest that kind of money which we all know about cost over-runs. High Speed Rail is so alluring, but it still needs to make sense. This 1 doesn't, too me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1936  
Old Posted Jan 3, 2014, 10:03 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,941
TexasRE:
Quote:
It could never pay for itself or even remotely cover hardly any of its expense,
Only passenger rail is held to this standard. None of the interstates cover their expenses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1937  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2014, 4:11 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by LA Times

Gov. Jerry Brown wants polluters' fees to help fund high-speed rail
Brown is seeking to annually shift a third of 'cap-and-trade' revenue to help build the first leg of the controversial project.
By Chris Megerian and Ralph Vartabedian
February 27, 2014, 8:45 p.m.

SACRAMENTO — Gov. Jerry Brown wants long-term funding for California's high-speed rail project to come from the state greenhouse gas reduction program, expanding his commitment to the $68-billion project despite an ongoing legal battle.

His plan would annually shift a third of all "cap-and-trade" revenue, generated through fees on polluters, to help build the first leg of the rail line, which is supposed to stretch from Merced to the San Fernando Valley by 2022.

The proposal could provide billions of dollars for the bullet train over the next several years, although administration officials have not released specific estimates

"We believe it will be a growing source of revenue," said H.D. Palmer, spokesman for Brown's Department of Finance.

Brown hinted at his plans in January, when he proposed spending $250 million in cap-and-trade money on the rail project in the fiscal year that begins July 1. His latest proposal would guarantee more money for the project each year until the first leg is completed.

In addition, as the state repays $500 million it borrowed from the cap-and-trade fund over the next few years, $400 million would be made available for high-speed rail.
http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-b...,4977021.story
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1938  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2014, 4:15 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABC

Calif. Dems kill bullet train funding accountability measure
Capitol Television News Service (CTNS) 10:38 a.m. PDT March 26, 2014

A Republican lawmaker is criticizing California Assembly Democrats for not supporting the California High Speed Rail Funding Accountability Act.

The act bans the high speed rail authority from spending any federal funds unless matching state funds are immediately available. This week, the majority of Democrats voted against the measure in the assembly transportation committee. CTNS did not report why they were opposed to the act.
http://www.news10.net/story/news/pol...y-act/6894577/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1939  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2014, 4:18 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by SBJ

Support for high-speed rail increases slightly
Mar 27, 2014, 5:10am PDT UPDATED: Mar 27, 2014, 9:16am PDT

In a development that may give the California High-Speed Rail Authority a boost, a new poll suggests that growing numbers of Californians approve of the bullet train project.

According to the Public Policy Institute of California, 53 percent of adults favor the train. The share in favor drops to 45 percent when only likely voters are polled.

That’s up slightly from last March, when 45 percent of adults supported the project and 43 percent of likely voters were in favor.
http://www.bizjournals.com/sacrament...increases.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1940  
Old Posted May 10, 2014, 2:20 PM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Washington Post



China may build an undersea train to America
BY ISHAAN THAROOR
May 9 at 8:01 pm

China is planning to build a train line that would, in theory, connect Beijing to the United States. According to a report in the Beijing Times, citing an expert at the Chinese Academy of Engineering, Chinese officials are considering a route that would start in the country's northeast, thread through eastern Siberia and cross the Bering Strait via a 125-mile long underwater tunnel into Alaska.

"Right now we're already in discussions. Russia has already been thinking about this for many years," says Wang Mengshu, the engineer cited in the article. The proposed "China-Russia-Canada-America" line would be some 8,000 miles long, 1,800 miles longer than the Trans-Siberian railroad. The tunnel that the Chinese would help bore beneath the icy seas would be four times the length of what traverses the English Channel.

That's reason enough to be skeptical of the project, of which there are few details beyond what was attributed to the one official cited by the state-run Beijing Times. Meanwhile, a report in the state-run China Daily insists the country does have the technology and means to complete a construction project of this scale, including another tunnel that would link the Chinese province of Fujian with nearby Taiwan.

In the past half decade or so, China has embarked on an astonishing rail construction spree, laying down tens of thousands of miles tracks and launching myriad high-speed lines. It has signaled its intent to build a "New Silk Road" -- a heavy-duty freight network through Central Asia that would connect with Europe via rail rather than the old caravans that once bridged West and East. A map that appeared on Xinhua's news site outlines the route below, alongside a parallel vision for a "maritime Silk Road."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...in-to-america/
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:09 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.