HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #281  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2015, 9:27 PM
dsmmace dsmmace is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 423
Has there been any noise about the SaskPower Logistics Building moving forward at the GTH?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #282  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2015, 9:35 PM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsmmace View Post
Has there been any noise about the SaskPower Logistics Building moving forward at the GTH?
There's a hold on all discretionary spending in the crowns right now (I'm assuming the prov govt wants to be able to take a large dividend to help their books)... So I'm thinking things might be a little sketchier on that front. Or maybe they got the commitment for it early enough that they can still proceed?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #283  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2015, 10:23 PM
sask1982's Avatar
sask1982 sask1982 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 910
A new aerial shot of the GTH would be nice. Google is quite out of date.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #284  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 12:26 AM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,237
Not GTH, but it is a cool aerial of the interchange where the west bypass heads north to the GTH. This pic is looking west.





http://www.wfbotkin.ca/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #285  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2015, 5:19 AM
thefourthtower thefourthtower is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rueannatta
Posts: 2,597
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #286  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2015, 9:31 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Two days ago, CTV did a story about the GTH and that is has slowed to a crawl. Potential tenants want to ensure that the infrastructure is in place first --- which is understandable. Otherwise, part of the West By-Pass is complete and just sitting there. Things are at an impasse for the time-being out there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #287  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2015, 4:03 AM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkydivePilot View Post
Two days ago, CTV did a story about the GTH and that is has slowed to a crawl. Potential tenants want to ensure that the infrastructure is in place first --- which is understandable. Otherwise, part of the West By-Pass is complete and just sitting there. Things are at an impasse for the time-being out there.
That story is here. But if we're being honest, you can thank me for the story, since it's clear that a CTV staffer read my post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
Is it really surprising that subsidizing land costs and promising billion dollar bypasses would attract a few companies to the GTH?

But since the early development of the Loblaws/CP/Fastfrate, what private companies have invested at the GTH or done so successfully. The bulk of the development in the last three years is all government related: Emterra (city contract), SLGA, SaskPower.

Sure Morguard went out there and built some warehouses but they're completely empty save the GTH themselves putting their office there. And there's probably incentives provided to build out there anyway, especially now the the GTH collects its own taxes and they city gets nothing.

What else? A tiny development by Sterling Hornoi? The GTH is, by all accounts, pretty much a failure. They expropriated land, then developed it with government money then sold it at less than half the cost of land within the city. Yet, private companies have, by and large, completely ignored the development while city land released in 2013 and private lots east of Regina have sold better.

The GTH was a government program designed to gain Loblaws. The bypass is probably also a condition of Loblaws development. And for what a few hundred trucks a day at most?
Ultimately, however, the problem with the GTH is not infrastructure. It's location. Go ask a trucking company or a general industrial user. They don't want to be there. Nobody wants to work there either, hence why Loblaws has to bus people out there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #288  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2015, 6:57 AM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
That story is here. But if we're being honest, you can thank me for the story, since it's clear that a CTV staffer read my post:


Ultimately, however, the problem with the GTH is not infrastructure. It's location. Go ask a trucking company or a general industrial user. They don't want to be there. Nobody wants to work there either, hence why Loblaws has to bus people out there.
Your comment here is purely subjective. The CP yards are now relocated there, . . thank goodness! Moreover, it is common for employers to mass-commute workers a semi-distant workplace outside of a city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #289  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2015, 1:10 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Deleted

Last edited by BrutallyDishonest2; Aug 3, 2015 at 12:22 AM. Reason: Arguing with some is a waste of time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #290  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2015, 6:06 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
Actually by comments are based on actual knowledge from industry. Your comments are based on a complete outsider hoping that a project is successful
Hahaha!!! You are hilarious!!!

FYI, potash mines in the Saskatoon area have several buses that commute workers daily to/fro the city to the Cory and Agrium potash mines. The GTH is no different.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #291  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2015, 11:31 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Deleted

Last edited by BrutallyDishonest2; Aug 3, 2015 at 12:22 AM. Reason: Arguing with some is a waste of time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #292  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2015, 7:36 AM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
Comparing the GTH to Potash mines pretty much makes my point. It's considered a long ways out and not part of the city. Nobody really wants to work out there, it's an island of nothing.

And what industry do you come into contact with you? How often are you engaging with the industrial sector in Regina? Are you actually familiar with the transportation industry and the industrial sector writ large?
You need to work on your grammar/sentence structure bud.

I recently lived in Vanscoy, SK which is located between the aforementioned mines. There is a 'mass-transit' program between various Saskatoon malls and the mines themselves. Subjectively speaking, that is brilliant! Why have 40 workers each drive their own vehicles when only one vehicle is required to transport those folks to/fro semi-long-distance employers. (It is likely that a small $$$ fee is involved.) That results with a reduction of vehicular traffic along Highway 7; shift changes are very busy along there.

Do you require a short dissertation of my post-secondary life? Okay:

Industrial sector???!!! During the late '80s, I was an ironworker.

I possess nine-years-worth of formal classroom-type, post-secondary education.

Am I familiar with the transportation industry???!!!! You bet I am --- as a bus driver and airline pilot, which involved(es) the carriage of passengers; cargo; dangerous goods, bla, bla, bla..... (The list goes on.)

How about you?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #293  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2015, 3:21 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Deleted

Last edited by BrutallyDishonest2; Aug 3, 2015 at 12:22 AM. Reason: Arguing with some is a waste of time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #294  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2015, 6:02 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2 View Post
There was no grammar error.

The late 80s is not today.

As a bus driver and airline pilot you know dick-all about the actual industry around transportation, logistics, real estate, manufacturing or anything else pertinent to the development of the GTH.

List me one company waiting for the bypass before moving to the GTH?
The SSP community is most grateful to have you on here ; I guess I don't know anything. Huh.

Back to business here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #295  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2015, 4:40 AM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Deleted

Last edited by BrutallyDishonest2; Aug 3, 2015 at 12:25 AM. Reason: Arguing with some is a waste of time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #296  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2015, 5:42 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by brutallydishonest2 View Post
that's what i thought.
lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #297  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2015, 8:35 PM
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 9,124
Honestly what is the point of building the GTH if its purpose is to attract existing business in Regina to move outside of city limits.

The purpose of building this is to attract new distribution and logistics companies to move to Saskatchewan instead of Winnipeg or Calgary. Given its mandate why would the GTH invest its time on trying to encourage existing companies in Regina to relocate.

Loblaws is a good example of what they need to go after. Building outside the city but close enough is key. Hopefully some of the small towns in the region also pick up jobs.

As for the crowns moving to lower cost real-estate and being subsidized by having the GTA build roads and overpasses it is hard to call that subsidy when the Crown subsidizes a dividend paying business it owns.

Hopefully over time that are starts to be served by public transit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #298  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2015, 11:44 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,029
Same thing is happening in Winnipeg with Centreport. Because of Manitoba's regressive taxes no new businesses will ever relocate to this province until long after a change in government. But since Centreport is partially outside of the City of Winnipeg (in the RM of Rosser) business will leave their location within city limits to avoid higher city taxes.

Surprise, everybody loses. The whole thing is completely pointless.
__________________
Get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #299  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2015, 12:21 AM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Here's the thing, the idea of the GTH is fundamentally flawed. Regina just isn't a good location for a logistics hub. In terms of business, money, geography, population etc, Regina is literally in the middle of nowhere. Major international groups have almost no incentive to move here. Why would the locate here when Calgary is closer the coast and has a much bigger population base?

Winnipeg is arguably better located, but it is also isolated. In fact Centreport has suffered because of its proximity to Chicago. There's no real reason for many large developments to go to Winnipeg with larger centers in the region. It's not really a taxation issue with Regina or Winnipeg, it's location and population base.

The subsidizing real estate is an issue that needs to be looked at. The province more-or-less expropriated land from farmers to give to private industry: Loblaws and CP. Then they used this cheap, under-priced land to attract people to move there, but the primary users is government again. It absolutely is an issue when you have an entire development functioning around government yet competing with private development. That the crown's give their profit to the government doesn't mitigate the folly of the project. The NDP complaining about the Sask Party ruining it is pointless. It was a bad idea to begin with and it will be a bad idea regardless of the government involved.

Regina needs to focus on what is does best: servicing the local community. We needn't invest money in pie-in-the-sky ideas when we can thrive doing other activities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #300  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2015, 12:29 AM
jigglysquishy's Avatar
jigglysquishy jigglysquishy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,326
The GTH is a total failure and will cost the province billions when all is said and done. The Bypass is unneeded and is going to further subsidize sprawl.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:15 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.