Posted Feb 7, 2020, 7:58 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 7,364
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000
That's completely false. Toronto was a major location of heavy industry. Toronto became more diversified and prominent than Buffalo, but Toronto was the heavy manufacturing center (foundries, mills, factories, and later automobile plants) and the major rail and shipping center for all of industrial Ontario.
Steel mills, iron foundries, machinery, engine, tool, and vehicle factories, oil refining, grain milling, livestock yards and processing, coke, iron ore and coal shipping and docks, large-scale brewing and distilling... these do not fall in the category of "light industry".
Toronto did all of the stuff Great Lakes industrial cities did... but becoming the center of so much more for Canada allowed it become what it is today. I think it's THE prime example of rustbelt success.
|
I think of the "rust belt" as iron and steel industries (with "Fordist" mass production) which were historically dominant. Detroit is the classic example, New York being a "light industry" city (with the clothing industry being dominant).
Employment by industry, 1930/1931:
Baltimore
Iron and steel 12,130
Clothing 12,092
Chicago
Iron and steel 55,643
Clothing 21,314
Cleveland
Iron and steel 37,257
Clothing 7,530
Montreal
Iron and steel 18,421
Clothing 17,884
Philadelphia
Clothing 21,825
Iron and steel 20,505
Toronto
Iron and steel 14,297
Clothing 11,387
Toronto was a "bit" heavier than Montreal but overall closer to Montreal than to Chicago and Cleveland in its industrial structure.
|