Quote:
Originally Posted by toddguy
Well that is all we can do is "assume" since they were not included. Seems like it would also be hard to go from 399,000 to "fairly small population gains" or "declines" but whatever. I admit I only posted my post because of his arrogant response-calling someone a moron when his list is, in fact, not accurate because it is not complete-there are not 20 cities listed.
|
I admit, randomly choosing 2005 as a data point was odd.
But giving that poster the benefit of the doubt, let's look at the numbers of the remaining 5 metros.
Detroit - 4,488,000 in 2005 and 4,313,002 in 2017 (decline of 174,998)
St. Louis - 2,733,155 in 2005 and 2,807,338 in 2017 (increase of 74,183)
Chicago - 9,362,080 in 2005 and 9,553,040 in 2017 (increase of 190,960)
Boston - 4,473,477 in 2005 and 4,836,531 in 2017 (increase of 363,054)
Philadelphia - 5,850,021 in 2005 and 6,096,020 in 2017 (increase of 245,999)
With exception to Boston, the remaining metros did in fact have notably smaller gains (while Detroit declined).
Source
Philadelphia:
https://www.phl.org/Documents/Busine...ts/MSD2013.pdf (page 80)
https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/n...ml#g/431264/33 (slide show)
Boston:
https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/n...ml#g/431264/33 (slide show)
https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspac...pdf?sequence=1 (page 65)
Chicago:
https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspac...pdf?sequence=1 (page 65)
https://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/war...477676043.html
St. Louis:
https://alfred.stlouisfed.org/series?seid=STLPOP
http://www.kansascity.com/news/local...206368289.html
Detroit:
https://www.census.gov/population/po...stribution.pdf (page 4)
https://www.freep.com/story/news/loc...ata/445199002/