HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > General Discussions, Culture, Dining, Sports & Recreation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2014, 2:15 AM
CalgaryArchitecture CalgaryArchitecture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 33
City of Chestermere

Town council votes 6-1 in favour of Chestermere becoming a city


http://www.campchestermere.com/myup/carousel/2.jpg

CHESTERMERE — Calgary’s fast-growing eastern neighbour has outgrown its status as a town, Chestermere council decided Monday night.

The community, which was only a summer village until 1993, will formally ask the province to rename it City of Chestermere at the start of next year.

It’s a move with no real effect on the municipality’s taxes or administration. But council hopes a new title makes the service-starved community more of a magnet for lucrative industrial and commercial development, or potentially for provincial infrastructure grants.

“The sooner we can get that competitive advantage, the sooner we can get access to the things residents want,” Mayor Patricia Matthews said.

Chestermere council voted 6-1 for the name change Monday, in front of a standing-room-only crowd that appeared largely opposed to the change.

“Is this the sort of thing that should go to plebiscite?” one resident asked at the meeting. The mayor said that option was too expensive, and public feedback from 250 people came after officials’ best efforts at formal consultation.

One of Alberta’s fastest-growing jurisdictions, Chestermere is home to 17,203 residents, this year’s local census states. It’s 2.5 times its size of a decade ago.

But it has few businesses contributing to property taxes. Its largest private employer is the Safeway, economic development officer Jean-Marc Lacasse said.

Less than five per cent of Chestermere’s property tax revenue comes from businesses, compared to half of Calgary’s.

Chestermere wants to draw more industrial and commercial projects so the tax base is big enough to offer many major urban trappings that don’t exist there, such as transit, curbside recycling pickup and a 311 hotline.

Councillors reasoned that the name “city” could give economic development staff a potent lure to developers who may overlook a town of the same size, or one so close to Calgary.

Lacasse said even before the switch, he’s heard interest from Calgary companies looking to relocate.

“They have shortlisted Chestermere, because by using the term city, for them it meant there was people, there were employees and there was a developed community,” he said.

Many residents were dubious city status would matter that much.

“I think making the place attractive to investment will bring investment,” said Peter Tindall.

“The name of the place won’t make any difference.”

Council members express hope the Alberta government will listen more to Chestermere’s grant requests if it’s one of the province’s 18 cities, instead of one of its 108 towns.

Any town with more than 10,000 residents can apply to become a city, though communities such as Okotoks, Cochrane and Strathmore have preferred to stick with the more humble title.

© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald
"Town Council Votes 6-1 in Favour of Chestermere Becoming a City." Www.calgaryherald.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Oct. 2014.
http://www.calgaryherald.com/busines...174/story.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2014, 2:56 AM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Ummm, this is already being discussed in the 'Alberta and British Columbia' sub-forum. Probably fits better in there.
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2014, 5:21 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 24,072
Is this going to make a difference in anything? And I will laugh my ass off if they go back to a "town" in a few years like Okotoks did. Mind you there is that proposal for 40 000 people in Chestermere, so it would be hard to have a town of 60 000 people...
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2014, 5:56 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Oakville in Ontario is still a town, with nearly 200 000 people.
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2014, 6:57 PM
Spring2008 Spring2008 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lower Mount Royal, Calgary
Posts: 5,147
Time to put up toll roads heading into the city from the north and east lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2014, 7:12 PM
lubicon's Avatar
lubicon lubicon is offline
Suburban dweller
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Calgary - our road planners are as bad as yours Edmonton
Posts: 5,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
Is this going to make a difference in anything? And I will laugh my ass off if they go back to a "town" in a few years like Okotoks did. Mind you there is that proposal for 40 000 people in Chestermere, so it would be hard to have a town of 60 000 people...
I wasn't aware of that, I thought Okotoks had never achieved city status. The only City that 'downgraded' to a town that I am aware of if Drumheller.
__________________
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.

Albert Einstein
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2014, 8:24 PM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Okotoks has never had city status in Alberta.
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2014, 4:40 PM
joe498 joe498 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 295
Chestermere is 5 minutes to NE Stoney Trail which is closer than Legacy in SE Calgary to SE Stoney Trail. I think it is time to annex Chestermere.

If you look at Calgary, the east is by far the least developed. We can't really build farther west due to Tsuu T'ina.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2014, 4:52 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 24,072
I thought I remembered reading somewhere that they became a city for a few years then reverted to town status.
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2014, 10:56 PM
Bassic Lab Bassic Lab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe498 View Post
Chestermere is 5 minutes to NE Stoney Trail which is closer than Legacy in SE Calgary to SE Stoney Trail. I think it is time to annex Chestermere.

If you look at Calgary, the east is by far the least developed. We can't really build farther west due to Tsuu T'ina.
The east was constrained for a very long time by active sour gas wells. The area is beginning to open up now but the legacy of that barrier to development is a lack of transportation infrastructure compared to other sectors (the west is in a similar place for infrastructure but the constraint there had to do with acreages making large subdivisions complicated). For the east to really develop it would need new infrastructure. An International Ave LRT could really let the area build out and turn Calgary into more of a circle instead of a stretched out, lop sided, oval. It would also help the ever present problem of housing in the west and jobs in the east that has plagued our transportation planning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2014, 8:12 PM
joe498 joe498 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassic Lab View Post
The east was constrained for a very long time by active sour gas wells. The area is beginning to open up now but the legacy of that barrier to development is a lack of transportation infrastructure compared to other sectors (the west is in a similar place for infrastructure but the constraint there had to do with acreages making large subdivisions complicated). For the east to really develop it would need new infrastructure. An International Ave LRT could really let the area build out and turn Calgary into more of a circle instead of a stretched out, lop sided, oval. It would also help the ever present problem of housing in the west and jobs in the east that has plagued our transportation planning.
Not exactly lacking infrastructure, as it stands, many from Chestermere take the NE LRT and park in the neighborhoods/park and ride.

I think the City needs to look more into developing the east now though. Most thing are cleaned up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2014, 8:37 PM
RyLucky's Avatar
RyLucky RyLucky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,498
The irony is that this whole "becoming a city thing" is a symptom of resistance to the growing influence of Calgary. Chestermere wants to maintain the ability to build whatever crap it wants until they inevitably ceded or amalgamated in 2050.

They want to be a city so that they can keep building like a small town.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2014, 12:06 AM
Full Mountain's Avatar
Full Mountain Full Mountain is offline
YIMBY
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyLucky View Post
The irony is that this whole "becoming a city thing" is a symptom of resistance to the growing influence of Calgary. Chestermere wants to maintain the ability to build whatever crap it wants until they inevitably ceded or amalgamated in 2050.

They want to be a city so that they can keep building like a small town.
Why should we assume their 70 years of low density buildings and pay to replace all the EOL infrastructure they built on a shoe string budget? IMO I hope we never get to the point where we have to take on that burden.
__________________
Incremental Photo - @PhotogX_1

Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are my own not those of any affiliated organizations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > General Discussions, Culture, Dining, Sports & Recreation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:09 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.