HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2024, 1:35 PM
TowerDude TowerDude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 302
Could PATH service be extended to the Meadowlands?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2024, 6:00 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,749
^ oh geez, lets get it to the airport first!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2024, 6:18 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by TowerDude View Post
Could PATH service be extended to the Meadowlands?
1950s proposed path expansions

https://flic.kr/p/SdrxU4

This expansion would have likely saved a few more commuter rail lines

https://flic.kr/p/QYtdWF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #224  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2024, 10:45 PM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by TowerDude View Post
Could PATH service be extended to the Meadowlands?
Yes, and it should have happened decades ago.

But it's much more likely that HBLR is eventually extended to the Meadowlands. At least this would provide good regional light rail connectivity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2024, 11:24 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,375
Much of HBLR should be PATH but that's a whole other issue.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 8:28 AM
jbermingham123's Avatar
jbermingham123 jbermingham123 is offline
Registered (Nimby Ab)User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: At a computer, wasting my life on a skyscraper website
Posts: 755
My dream (which will never, ever, ever happen) is the merger of NJT, LIRR, and PATH (which is true heavy rail like the others) into a single transit system with through-running at Penn station and the WTC station.

It should be possible to take a LIRR train through Atlantic terminal to the WTC station, and continue on to JC and Newark.

most of the infrastructure for this already exists. The east river tunnel is the only significant missing link, and could potentially be acquired by repurposing one of the 4 (!!!) existing subway tunnels from atlantic terminal which cross the east river
__________________
You guys are laughing now but Jacksonville will soon assume its rightful place as the largest and most important city on Earth.

I heard the UN is moving its HQ there. The eiffel tower is moving there soon as well. Elon Musk even decided he didnt want to go to mars anymore after visiting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 10:19 AM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Much of HBLR should be PATH but that's a whole other issue.
It overlaps in Downtown Jersey City but it follows the 1930s proposed route down to Bayonne and up to North Bergen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 2:20 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,749
what’s the status on plans to extend the lr up to englewood and beyond?

that seems to be the logical and easiest next steps.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 4:18 PM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,523
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbermingham123 View Post
My dream (which will never, ever, ever happen) is the merger of NJT, LIRR, and PATH (which is true heavy rail like the others) into a single transit system with through-running at Penn station and the WTC station.

It should be possible to take a LIRR train through Atlantic terminal to the WTC station, and continue on to JC and Newark.

most of the infrastructure for this already exists. The east river tunnel is the only significant missing link, and could potentially be acquired by repurposing one of the 4 (!!!) existing subway tunnels from atlantic terminal which cross the east river
Do all LIRR, NJT, Amtrak, MTA subways, and PATH rails at Penn Station have platforms on the same level vertically? It's difficult to trough run trains with tracks on different levels.
Additionally, I understand that Amtrak, LIRR, and NJT are regulated by the FRA while MTA subway and PATH are regulated by the FTA. Rarely are trains regulated by the FTA and FRA allowed to run on the same tracks, and never at the same time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 5:21 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnyc View Post
what’s the status on plans to extend the lr up to englewood and beyond?

that seems to be the logical and easiest next steps.
Murphy's appointee screwed things up so badly the feds want a new review...its just one of the many projects hes screwed up...but none of the highway projects been affected..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 5:23 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
Do all LIRR, NJT, Amtrak, MTA subways, and PATH rails at Penn Station have platforms on the same level vertically? It's difficult to trough run trains with tracks on different levels.
Additionally, I understand that Amtrak, LIRR, and NJT are regulated by the FRA while MTA subway and PATH are regulated by the FTA. Rarely are trains regulated by the FTA and FRA allowed to run on the same tracks, and never at the same time.
Yes , you can see this at Newark Penn. PATH is FRA due to legacy tracks interconnecting to the NEC.. The different electrification systems and the lack of high level platforms on the Morris & Essex are the biggest hurdles to merging and through running.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 5:24 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnyc View Post
^ so nice to see nexis back in action!
I'm back , I had to be sneaky with that platform shot as the PATH has a ban on photography..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #233  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2024, 1:12 AM
wanderer34 wanderer34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Miami/somewhere in paradise
Posts: 1,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
Yes, and it should have happened decades ago.

But it's much more likely that HBLR is eventually extended to the Meadowlands. At least this would provide good regional light rail connectivity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Much of HBLR should be PATH but that's a whole other issue.
The PATH and HBLR systems are completely different in construction and use. The PATH is an actual railroad which is grade separated and has it's own reporting mark while the HBLR is a newly constructed system which is either at grade, below grade, or above grade depending on the location.

It's best to keep both systems separated anyways since PATH is owned by the PANYNJ, a bi-state agency, while HBLR is owned by NJT, which covers the entire state of NJ.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbermingham123 View Post
My dream (which will never, ever, ever happen) is the merger of NJT, LIRR, and PATH (which is true heavy rail like the others) into a single transit system with through-running at Penn station and the WTC station.

It should be possible to take a LIRR train through Atlantic terminal to the WTC station, and continue on to JC and Newark.

most of the infrastructure for this already exists. The east river tunnel is the only significant missing link, and could potentially be acquired by repurposing one of the 4 (!!!) existing subway tunnels from atlantic terminal which cross the east river
And that's what it is, nothing more than just a dream!!! It's a possibility of connecting Atlantic Terminal to the WTC station, which will cost a lot of money, but combining the three transit agencies is going to only create a lot of infighting between NY and NJ, plus the fare structures are so different in that PATH operates on a flat rate, while NJT and LIRR have their own fare zones.

It's just best to let each state do it's own thing and not mess with the current structures. Also, NYC is the main destination for a lot of modes of transport, which is why Grand Central is currently a terminus, and Penn Station is the busiest train station in the Americas, if not the world!

If a commuter who lives in LI has a job in either JC, Hoboken, or Newark, then he'd have to transfer either at Penn Station of WTC just to do so, and the reason why it's designed that way is because of the economic strength or Downtown and Midtown Manhattan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #234  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2024, 6:08 PM
TowerDude TowerDude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 302
I think I'd prefer to see Amtrak take over any Through running at Penn Station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #235  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2024, 12:05 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,283
World Trade Center train at Newark

Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:43 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.