HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2023, 2:52 PM
GreatTallNorth2 GreatTallNorth2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,461
That's some pretty serious road work, can we have the province take over all of London's road planning please?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2023, 4:00 PM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is online now
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by jammer139 View Post
MTO recently had their Highway 3 extension and widening PIC #2 meeting Nov 22nd and some updated alternatives were included in the information.


http://www.highway3elgin.ca/resource...l_20231120.pdf
I'm still in awe full interchanges are planned for this. What really puzzles me is the roundabout at Highway 4. I would assume once this phase is done another phase would get built to extend the Highway 3 freeway to the 401, and it's goona be annoying to rebuild this into an interchange.

But then again it took them like 50 years to go from the old Highway 3 to this plan, so an extension to the 401 may take another 50
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2024, 12:22 AM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is online now
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,211
Highway 3 twinning/extension build may start next year according to this document.
https://www.highway3elgin.ca/resourc...l_20231120.pdf

It still isn't under the MTO's highway expansion/rehab map however. This was just updated for 2024 as well (includes the proposed 413)
https://www.ontario.ca/page/ontarios-highway-programs

Public input is good till March 5
https://www.highway3elgin.ca/resourc...completion.pdf
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2024, 5:49 PM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is online now
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,211
Interesting post on urban Toronto regarding the freeways/roads in the London area during the 2000s https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/thread...12233/page-446
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2024, 3:34 AM
Yerbamate Yerbamate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 2
Ring Road

Assuming the Ring Road idea is dead as ever, especially considering the City has expanded out so far. What’s the plausibility any form of Ring Road will be considered in the future? Seems a lot of sensitive land on the West side would be destroyed, but the North and East would still be doable. Veterans minus the traffic lights. Once more of the city expands south of the 401 they will at least have that highway as a branch.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2024, 4:41 AM
Pimpmasterdac's Avatar
Pimpmasterdac Pimpmasterdac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 695
At this point it would have to be the province stepping in to build anything meaningful, which I don't see happening as London provincial is solid NDP and only accounts for 3 seats. City of London is broke, is delaying essential infrastructure projects in town as they have put their eggs into BRT that is going wildy over budget.

Even if there wasn't the financial issues, any north end ring road at this point would be outside of London proper as it's been or being developed to the city limits. Middlesex Centre was asked in the 90s about building said leg of the ring road and wanted no part of it. Unless province steps in to either build it as an extension to Highway 7 or redraws municipal boundaries it's a dead end.

As mentioned in another post there was a west end corridor between Woodhull and Westdel Bourne that the City wanted to use for a potential ring road in the early 2000s. It would have gone for either 401 or 402 to Oxford. However nothing in the most recent city budget mentions this, and at this point are just old lines on a map with the city not owning any of the land and nothing being planned.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2024, 5:15 AM
Mick42 Mick42 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 11
Ring Road

It’s a shame, London will be one of the biggest cities I can think of with no Expressway or Ring road. Not counting Highbury which is really just a spur. Hopefully Veterans can become traffic light free at some point. A straight run North to South on the East end would count for something.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2024, 10:51 AM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,558
I don't know how useful a ring road even would be anymore. It's so far, how far north are people willing to drive to go east from the west end to avoid taking Oxford? I don't even think we need an east-west route anymore so much as we need a good route from the west to the 402/401. Strange to say, but Wonderland is too far east now and is a shitshow to drive down from anywhere north. Doesn't even have to be a highway. I've said before how I wished Westdel would run north to Gainsborough and south to the 402.

Of course, who knows where the city is going to go 50 years from now (and I know I won't care lol), maybe the boundary is going to go to Ilderton and a highway corridor just beyond the current development plans north of Sunningdale should be protected
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2024, 6:03 PM
Mick42 Mick42 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 11
Ring Road

Elevated Rail transport like Chicagos L train would work on a loop in lieu of the Ring Road. BRT will put a small dent in alleviating traffic woes but I do think there needs to be a bolder move long term.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2024, 6:06 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is online now
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,967
No expressway. No ring road. No mass transit.

0/3
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2024, 6:10 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is online now
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey View Post
Interesting post on urban Toronto regarding the freeways/roads in the London area during the 2000s https://urbantoronto.ca/forum/thread...12233/page-446
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2024, 6:41 PM
Mick42 Mick42 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 11
Ring Road

That proposal looks awesome. Still doable, would need to work on overpasses and underpasses for Veterans first. Wild that they built the North extension with traffic lights. I’m sure this is a matter of funding but there needs to be a re-evaluation before moving on these things. Londons growth is exponential and not addressing these concerns is pretty foolish. West past Westdel Bourne seems to avoid any areas of concern and would help with any inevitable future sprawl that way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2024, 8:42 PM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is online now
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick42 View Post
That proposal looks awesome. Still doable, would need to work on overpasses and underpasses for Veterans first. Wild that they built the North extension with traffic lights. I’m sure this is a matter of funding but there needs to be a re-evaluation before moving on these things. Londons growth is exponential and not addressing these concerns is pretty foolish. West past Westdel Bourne seems to avoid any areas of concern and would help with any inevitable future sprawl that way.
The city's broke and full of NIMBYs. That corridor protection study is from 2001 and thus woefully outdated- likely obsolete or impossible in some areas now.

The sections that call for 6 lanes and aren't even 4 lanes today should be the main priority. Getting those 4-laned would give you the best bang for your buck.
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2024, 10:31 PM
Pimpmasterdac's Avatar
Pimpmasterdac Pimpmasterdac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Posts: 695
Even VMP while built, isn't planned to have interchanges the full length until 2062, the initial plan was to build an interchangeable every 5 years or so. Even 2062 date now seems unlikely as it's nowhere on the City's radar, and only a hope if provincial government steps. However London backs the wrong horse politically, we have 0 PC MPPs to advocate for this and highway building isn't the NDPs agenda.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2024, 12:00 AM
jammer139 jammer139 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Posts: 5,813
Sadly the deepest blame lies at the feet of our no progress municipal leaders of the past. Al Gleason and Jane Bigelow who famously said when the province came calling to built Highway 100 as divided highway and with 80% of the bill she lead the charge to say NO we don't want the city to grow. Council after council buried their heads in the sand and looked the other way when they could have been setting aside ROW for future expressways and rapid transit because "Hell NO we won't Grow" thinking.



The lack of vision and planning lives on till this day.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2024, 12:19 AM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by jammer139 View Post
Sadly the deepest blame lies at the feet of our no progress municipal leaders of the past. Al Gleason and Jane Bigelow who famously said when the province came calling to built Highway 100 as divided highway and with 80% of the bill she lead the charge to say NO we don't want the city to grow. Council after council buried their heads in the sand and looked the other way when they could have been setting aside ROW for future expressways and rapid transit because "Hell NO we won't Grow" thinking.



The lack of vision and planning lives on till this day.
The province didn't need the city's say so to have built 100 the way they did 126, since the city limits were the river back then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2024, 1:27 AM
Mick42 Mick42 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 11
To think of the mentality “we don’t want the city to grow.” Better to have it and not use it than not have it and need it. The growth of London was always inevitable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2024, 3:07 AM
GreatTallNorth2 GreatTallNorth2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,461
Is London any different today than it was back then? Do you hear any mayor showing courage and vision for building transit and proper roads? Like Josh Morgan seems like a nice guy but do you really think he will be bold in fixing the city's terrible infrastructure? Not a chance. They just kick the same can down the road year after year, decade after decade. They will do a big study that will take years, hire consultants and then the nimbys will make sure the city does nothing. At least Waterloo has a regional government for stability with these things and Hamilton is under the umbrella of Metrolinx. London is an island and if a mayor did have courage to build what we need, I think there would be a major public outcry, funded of course by Joe Kools.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2024, 10:42 AM
Djeffery Djeffery is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,558
Matt Brown I think had that chance. Couldn't keep it in his pants, so we'll never know how he would have steered the whole BRT thing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2024, 1:02 PM
GreatTallNorth2 GreatTallNorth2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
Matt Brown I think had that chance. Couldn't keep it in his pants, so we'll never know how he would have steered the whole BRT thing.
I have no idea why Mattress Brown changed his mind on rapid transit. From my memory he was supportive of LRT but after he had the affair he changed to BRT.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > London > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:25 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.