A long time ago, in a land far away I used to live in Tulsa. In fact, my in-laws still live there.
The workforce in Tulsa (as a whole), is much less educated than Austin (as you would expect, it is mainly oil and gas-focused). I am by no means an expert on the Tulsa workforce; but from my empirical observations, I do not see a lot of automotive traditional manufacturing there (outside a random school bus facility). They do have the AA maintenance facility though... But outside of that, I think it is mainly oil/gas and said industry-related jobs. The cost of living is cheaper (the inlaws always remind me of this when I visit), but there is a state income tax. The schools there are crap; the state went to a four day school week last year because the state government cut taxes so much they could not pay the teachers. Also, the Tulsa Port of Catoosa's main focus is oil and grain.
However, they do have a low cost of living and the quality of life is improving due to the old oil money that is prevalent throughout town. Call me biased; however, as a quasi-tech company, it would not attract the most qualified applicants.
As an added point, last year, Tulsa was paying people 10K a year to move there but work elsewhere.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tulsa-o...heres-a-catch/
They both have their benefits, but there is a stark difference between the two.