HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForumSkyscraper Posters
     
Welcome to the SkyscraperPage Forum

Since 1999, the SkyscraperPage Forum has been one of the most active skyscraper enthusiast communities on the web. The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics. Welcome!

You are currently browsing as a guest. Register with the SkyscraperPage Forum and join this growing community of skyscraper enthusiasts. Registering has benefits such as fewer ads, the ability to post messages, private messaging and more.

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Europe

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #341  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2014, 12:30 PM
New Brisavoine New Brisavoine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 673
Yearly update of the comparison between Hamburg, Lyon, Lille, Toulouse, and Bordeaux, this time based on the final figures from the 2011 French and German censuses. The population of Hamburg has been significantly revised down by the German census.

This year I've been able to add Munich, thanks to very detailed land area and population figures now available online for the communes (municipalities) and commune-free forest areas of Bavaria.

And the 2nd largest city of Germany is....

__________________
New Axa – New Brisavoine
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #342  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2014, 1:37 PM
Lear's Avatar
Lear Lear is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Europa
Posts: 500
What about Frankfurt and Stuttgart ?
These 2 cities are supposed to have a similar size of urbanized area
compared to Munich/ Hamburg...
__________________
Air.Berlin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #343  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2014, 2:05 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 9,012
How did Munich surpass Hamburg? Munich has around 1.3-1.4 million residents.

It's been growing in recent years, but no way did it add 300,000 residents unless it annexed a huge area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #344  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2014, 2:39 PM
New Brisavoine New Brisavoine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 673
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lear View Post
What about Frankfurt and Stuttgart ?
These 2 cities are supposed to have a similar size of urbanized area
compared to Munich/ Hamburg...
A quick look shows that Stuttgart should have less than 1,350,000 inhabitants in 755 km². Frankfurt should also have less than 1,350,000 inhabitants in its 755 km².

In the Ruhr: Essen, Bochum, Herne, Herten, Gelsenkirchen, Gladbeck, Oberhausen, and Mülheim an der Ruhr together have 1,853,649 inhabitants in 754 km².

Cologne should have less than 1,550,000 inhabitants in its 755 km².

Düsseldorf has 1,240,000 inhabitants in its 755 km².
__________________
New Axa – New Brisavoine
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #345  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2014, 2:41 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 9,012
Aha, I see what you're doing now. So you're just comparing roughly equivalent geographies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #346  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2014, 12:50 AM
New Brisavoine New Brisavoine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 673
A comparison of Munich and Vienna at the 2011 censuses.

I wonder what the former Austrian emperors would think about this, seeing the upstart Munich now larger and more prosperous than the old imperial capital...

__________________
New Axa – New Brisavoine

Last edited by New Brisavoine; Aug 1, 2014 at 1:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #347  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2014, 8:55 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 9,012
Wow, very interesting.

I knew Munich was rich, but had no idea it was significantly richer than Vienna, which is already one of the richest cities in Europe. Munich is really an incredibly prosperous place right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #348  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2014, 8:48 PM
Lear's Avatar
Lear Lear is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Europa
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
I knew Munich was rich, but had no idea it was significantly richer than Vienna, which is already one of the richest cities in Europe. Munich is really an incredibly prosperous place right now.
Basically Munich´s ascend goes back to the 1970ies when the city was host to the Olympics. For almost 3 decades, Munich was the secret capital of West-Germany.

Its quite interesting that Munich, the capital of Bavaria, is sometimes overlooked as a business center in the Anglo-World. In fact Munich is host to several of the 30 German DAX companies.

BMW, Allianz (one of the worlds largest insurance company) , Munich Re (one of the worlds largest re-insurance company), Siemens (europes largest high tech company) are centered in the city.

You have heard of Bayern Munich the football club? Well, now you know were the money comes from to form a successful global sports brand ….
__________________
Air.Berlin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #349  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2014, 1:44 PM
New Brisavoine New Brisavoine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 673
Now that we finally have the 2011 census figures of France, Switzerland, and Germany, we can calculate the population figures for the metropolitan areas of Switzerland.

There exist no official statistical definition for the metropolitan areas of Switzerland (except for the part of the Basel and Geneva metro areas on French soil, where INSEE provides an official statistical definition). Here for the Swiss and German parts of the Swiss metro areas I have used either some widely-circulated unofficial definitions, or some official but non-statistical definitions (such as administrative definitions). See below the tables for exact territories included.

As a result, the total population of each metro area is only given as indicative. It should not be taken as absolute truth, especially when the metro areas are close to each other in population (for example, it is not possible to say that the Basel metro area is more populated than the Geneva metro area, because the area included in the Basel metro area is quite large and not based on a statistical definition except the part on French soil). What's more interesting is the population growth, in particular relative growth, which is little affected by the definition used for each metro area (for example, I've tried various definitions of the Zurich metro area, and the yearly growth rate is always remarkably the same, with a difference no bigger than 0.03%).

Relative growth rate of the Swiss metro areas between 2006 and 2011:
- Geneva metro area (Swiss & French parts): +1.80% per year
- Lausanne metro area: +1.60%
- Zurich metro area: +1.47%
- Basel metro area (Swiss & French parts; no data for the German part): +0.68%
- Bern metro area: +0.43%

For comparison, the Toulouse metro area, which is the fastest growing metro area in France outside the Geneva area, had a population growth rate of only +1.34% per year between and 2006 and 2011 (a lower growth rate than in the previous intercensal periods). In Germany, the fastest growing metro area is Munich, with a population growth rate of +1.59% per year since the 2011 census (no data for the years before the census). In Belgium, the Brussels metro area (defined as Brussels-Capital + Flemish and Walloon Brabant), which has experienced a boom in the late 2000s and early 2010s, had a population growth rate of +1.28% per year between 2006 and 2011.

Absolute population growth between 2006 and 2011:
- Zurich metro area: +19,873 people per year
- Geneva metro area (Swiss & French parts): +14,241
- Lausanne metro area: +5,876
- Basel metro area (Swiss & French parts; no data for the German part): +4,428
- Bern metro area: +1,638

Definitions:
Zurich metro area: canton of Zurich minus the districts of Winterthur and Andelfingen + the districts of Baden and Bremgarten in the canton of Aargau + the district of Höfe in the canton of Schwyz

Geneva metro area: canton of Geneva + district of Nyon in the canton of Vaud + INSEE-defined French part of the metro area

Basel metro area:
Switzerland: canton of Basel-Stadt + canton of Basel-Landschaft + districts of Rheinfelden and Laufenburg in the canton of Aargau + districts of Thierstein and Dorneck in the canton of Solothurn
France: INSEE-defined French part of the metro area
Germany: district of Lörrach + municipalities of Wehr and Bad Säckingen in the district of Waldshut

Lausanne metro area: districts of Lausanne, Ouest lausannois, Lavaux-Oron, Morges, and Gros-de-Vaud

Bern metro area: administrative district of Bern-Mittelland

Some maps at the same scale with land area and population in 2011. In those maps and area/population figures, the German part of the Basel metro area is included. It was not included in the growth figures above because the German statistical office has not yet released the intercensal (1987-2011) population figures.

__________________
New Axa – New Brisavoine
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #350  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2014, 11:04 AM
New Brisavoine New Brisavoine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 673
Thanks to the statistical yearbooks of the German Reich published online, I've been able to extend the comparison of Munich/Hamburg with Lyon/Lille/Toulouse/Bordeaux all the way back to 1911.



The progress of Munich has been impressive. In 1911, Munich had only half the population of Hamburg. The city experienced no decline during WW2 thanks to the arrival of refugees (from the Sudetenland I suppose), then had very high growth during the Wirtschaftswunder (post-WW2 economic boom), and no population decline in the 1970s, so that it passed Hamburg in population in the late 1990s to become Germany's 2nd largest city.

In France, the stagnation of provincial France before the 1950s shows. Lyon in particular experienced severe stagnation and ossification until the mid-1950s under the tenure of its long-time mayor Edouard Herriot (who was mayor of Lyon from 1905 to 1957 ). Of course the curve here shows the evolution of many more communes than just the city of Lyon proper, but the central city influenced the development (or lack thereof) of the whole urban area.

In the case of Lille, the destructions of the two world wars (in particular WW1 which was catastrophic in French Flanders) added their effects to the general stagnation of provincial France.

Toulouse of course is the one exception in provincial France. Apart from a brief period after WW2, the city has boomed ever since the French government relocated the French gun powder/explosives and aviation industries there at the start of WW1, because it was the metropolitan French city furthest from Germany.

Much like Hamburg and Munich, in 1911 Toulouse had only half the population of Bordeaux (historically a city as large as Hamburg and Barcelona, but which had already stagnated in the 19th century), and it passed Bordeaux in population in the mid-1990s. The 755 km² of Toulouse saw their population multiply by almost 5 in the 100 years between 1911 and 2011, as you can see in the 2nd graph, which is something quite rare in Europe.

Bordeaux is along with Nantes the most disastrous un-success story in France. Two cities that were among the biggest cities of Europe in 1800 thanks to colonial trade with the Americas and India, then stagnated from 1800 to 1960, and have never recovered their former rank, despite their current population boom.

Note that there are no data for Munich and Hamburg between 1987 and 2011, because the German statistical office has not yet published intercensal estimates.



__________________
New Axa – New Brisavoine
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #351  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2014, 8:17 PM
Miu Miu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 337
It's an interesting comparison, and Munich's rise is undeniable (in economic and cultural terms even more so than in demographic terms) but your graphs and figures only show us which urban areas are more populous within a specific, randomly defined area, regardless whether that area is reflective of their true expanse. They don't tell us much about the overall size of those cities. Hamburg is one of the least dense urban areas in Europe, that doesn't mean it's a smaller city than Munich (not yet at least). The Ruhr Area is larger than either, even if it has a smaller number of people in its 755 sqkm.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #352  
Old Posted Yesterday, 5:28 PM
look look is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
What about Marseilles?
__________________
Signature under construction...
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
   
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Europe
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:19 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.