Quote:
Originally Posted by hookem
This. Definitely this.
And yet most analysts have Austin, and sometimes Dallas, in the very short list of likely candidates of likely HQ2 locations.
|
These very early evaluations were relatively superficial and comparisons on things that were easily quantifiable on the attributes of cities. They didn't analyze the financial political workings of hundreds of cities. My point is when you look at the Austin city government then you start to see problems along with the Texas ledge. None of these rankings are doing that. They'll just take notice when what we see now eventually manifests itself in real world implications.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hookem
I think you are overreacting to some political theatrics that don't materially change anything. I believe the state still willingly hands out money to big corporations, and the city council is still very much enamored with the "right" kind of high profile company.
A lot of people, myself included, believe this whole "bid" thing with Amazon is nothing more than a publicity stunt and slight fishing expedition. They have their short list, or even a single preferred location, and they are negotiating with them behind the scenes.
Could be Austin, or maybe not. If it is, the mayor and the others in the know are keeping it quite close to the vest.
|
Repeating slashing of the Governor's incentives funds is not political theatrics. The senate cutting film/music incentives to 10 million and the house eliminating it entirely are not political theatrics. The city council constantly punting issues over and over is not political theatrics.
I don't think you're right here. I hope that if Austin doesn't get it, you'll think about what I was saying and not dismiss it. The problem with the council and the ledge is real and one of those things you can look back to when you find yourself in a recession.