HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2981  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2017, 6:31 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin1971 View Post
Heard that Condor is more than likely going to start year round service next year, twice weekly. If that goes well they will expand to four times weekly the year after that.

On that Trans-pacific flight we all want so badly. A few weeks back JAL representatives were at the port inspecting the facilities. JAL will use the port as a diversion port for their 787 operations at DFW. From what I heard they were very impressed with everything. Also the rumor is that they are in discussions about starting service coinciding with the opening of the new east pier.
Thanks for the update! We can always count on you!

So, it sounds like 2019 may be an exciting year; the opening of the new east pier, Condor moving to 4x weekly (year round), and possibly the addition of n/s service to Tokyo on JAL.

I would love to see Condor year round at 2x (or 3x) weekly and Lufthansa pick up 2x or 3x weekly using their new A350. Heck, I'd take their A332 or A333. Maybe one could fly to Frankfurt and the other to Munich. Ha. Yeah, I know...just fun and wishful thinking.
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*

Last edited by GoldenBoot; Mar 7, 2017 at 6:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2982  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2017, 8:41 PM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,431
Interesting that BA and Condor are both introducing service out of New Orleans this year that basically duplicates the flights offered by these two airlines out of Austin. I guess it is their strategy for second tier cities. The New Orleans flights will rely almost exclusively on tourists since New Orleans is not really much of an international business destination. It might be harder to make a profit relying so much on the tourist passenger.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2983  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2017, 8:48 PM
LoneStarMike's Avatar
LoneStarMike LoneStarMike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,264
January 2017 cargo and passenger traffic

Quote:
Passenger Activity: Total passenger traffic for January 2017 was 920,946, up 5.5% compared to January 2016. January 2017 enplanements totaled 454,208, up 5%. Southwest Airlines passengers totaled 357,671, up 1.5% compared to January 2016; American Airlines passengers totaled 190,284, up 4%; United Airlines passengers totaled 134,998, up 1%; Delta Air Lines passengers totaled 109,863, up 9%; jetBlue Airways passengers totaled 43,752, up 13%; Frontier Airlines passengers totaled 23,522, up 36%; Alaska Airlines passengers totaled 17,395, up 31%; Allegiant Air passengers totaled 12,556, up 48%; Virgin America passengers totaled 11,838, up 5%; British Airways passengers totaled 9,877, up 0.1 %; Air Canada passengers totaled 3,394, up 18%; AeroMexico passengers totaled 2,932; Volaris passengers totaled 2,183; and Texas Sky passengers totaled 126, up 5%.

January 2017 air cargo totaled 13,583,548 lbs., up 11.5% compared to January 2016. International air cargo totaled 1,643,748 lbs., up 93.5%. Federal Express carried 8 million lbs., up 8.5%; and United Parcel Service carried 2.5 million lbs., up 32%.

Air Services transferred 452,562 lbs. of mail, up 18%; and 1,278,598 lbs. of belly freight, up 3%.

Aircraft Operations: General Aviation operations totaled 4,340, up 8%. Combined operations (including commercial and military) totaled 15,661, up 5%.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2984  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2017, 9:04 PM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,735
The possibility of a direct Tokyo route would be ideal for several of my Japanese friends and aquantances as well as would give me a push ahead to plan a trip to Tokyo.

Just knowing ABIA is going to be a diversion port for JAL is cool enough in that we may occasionally see their planes here. Hopefully it is a sign of things to come.

I've said this before but it warrants repeating. ABIA will continue to be the dominant port for the southern half of the state for international travel. The runways are there, the space and the capacity to expand significantly is there. It's location makes it easily accessible from DT and the metro with 3 major arteries to access it. Austin got very lucky with timing of the base closure.

Yay and the January numbers are in! Looking good.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2985  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2017, 10:40 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy View Post
Just knowing ABIA is going to be a diversion port for JAL is cool enough in that we may occasionally see their planes here. Hopefully it is a sign of things to come.
If I am not mistaken, ABIA has been the primary diversion airport for all long haul international routes serving DFW & IAH (regardless of airline).

Now, I will say, ABIA may not be the primary diversion airport with regard to A380 operations...yet.
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2986  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2017, 12:01 AM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBoot View Post
If I am not mistaken, ABIA has been the primary diversion airport for all long haul international routes serving DFW & IAH (regardless of airline).

Now, I will say, ABIA may not be the primary diversion airport with regard to A380 operations...yet.
Yea, I know that there have been diverted flights which are occasionally mentioned on the thread and it's always interesting to hear about what carriers show up.

But that brings up the question as to why JAL representatives would have to inspect the port just for the purpose of routing diverted JAL flights to ABIA if it's pretty common for any long haul regardless of airline? Have other international carriers sent representatives here just for the purpose of diversions? It's becoming pretty clear that they were here for more than simply inspecting the facilities just for route diversions. It gives the rumors of a direct route more weight.

Will be interesting to see how things play out in the coming months.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2987  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2017, 12:16 AM
JoninATX JoninATX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The ATX
Posts: 3,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy View Post
The possibility of a direct Tokyo route would be ideal for several of my Japanese friends and aquantances as well as would give me a push ahead to plan a trip to Tokyo.

Just knowing ABIA is going to be a diversion port for JAL is cool enough in that we may occasionally see their planes here. Hopefully it is a sign of things to come.

I've said this before but it warrants repeating. ABIA will continue to be the dominant port for the southern half of the state for international travel. The runways are there, the space and the capacity to expand significantly is there. It's location makes it easily accessible from DT and the metro with 3 major arteries to access it. Austin got very lucky with timing of the base closure.

Yay and the January numbers are in! Looking good.
You know what also could work would be a direct flight from Austin to Seoul. Since Samsung is established here, I never understood why Austin never had a direct flight to any Asian country? Plus I myself have never been oversees and would love to have something along the lines of having a direct flight to Asia.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2988  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2017, 3:11 AM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,477
^^ I think Seoul is one of the nicest airports in the world also. I've said that before and I'll continue to say it. It would also be a convenient route for me to get back to Austin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2989  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2017, 6:44 AM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,257
As for fun, wishful thinking…how about the following new routes by the early 2020’s?
(Assuming American legacy airlines continue to not include n/s international routes out of AUS)


AUS-LHR – British Airways B773ER (up from the B789)

AUS-GRU – LATAM via B788, B789 or A359

AUS-(FRA and/or MUC) – Lufthansa via A333 or A359

AUS-ICN – Asiana via A359

AUS-CDG – Air France via A332, A359, or B789

AUS-PTY – Copa via B738

AUS-YVR – Air Canada via A319 or A320 OR WestJet via B73G

AUS-KEF – WOW via A333

AUS-PEK – Hainan via B789

AUS-LGW – Norwegian via B788

AUS-ARN – Norwegian via B788

AUS-DOH – Qatar via A359, B788 or B789

PLUS – A couple of Caribbean destinations offered by jetBlue or Spirit



**NOTE-1: Not all of these routes would be daily – at least initially**

**NOTE-2: Please do not start telling me how this cannot be true or how it cannot work. It's purely for fun.**
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2990  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2017, 7:47 AM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,477
Instead of PEK, I'd suggest PVG or CAN/SZX (even though I hate personally Guangzhou). These are both larger manufacturing areas that partner with software/hardware companies like those based in Austin. PEK would require another leg for lots of folks out of Austin even though it's generally a larger connection point for China. Another to consider is CTU, though that would be a similar issue with PEK.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2991  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2017, 11:58 AM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,144
I don't know a single one of those abbreviations. I'm not much a world traveler.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2992  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2017, 12:39 PM
sammyk sammyk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 514
Quote:
Originally Posted by lzppjb View Post
I don't know a single one of those abbreviations. I'm not much a world traveler.
https://www.world-airport-codes.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...pe_designators
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2993  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2017, 7:42 PM
jbssfelix's Avatar
jbssfelix jbssfelix is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Central Park
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBoot View Post
AUS-YVR – Air Canada via A319 or A320 OR WestJet via B73G
Don't you dare tease me with that!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2994  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2017, 10:10 PM
Trim 1980 Trim 1980 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 3
Aus to Msp on Sun Country announced today
Also from the south terminal

Last edited by Trim 1980; Mar 8, 2017 at 10:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2995  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2017, 7:52 PM
quikkings711 quikkings711 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 5
AUS to SJC on AS announced today.

https://newsroom.alaskaair.com/2017-...m-the-Bay-Area
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2996  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2017, 9:30 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,257
YUK! Just noticed the AeroMexico and Volaris numbers for January...and they are pretty bad in terms of passenger load factor.

Are those flights to MEX and GDL daily flights?
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2997  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2017, 9:46 PM
jbssfelix's Avatar
jbssfelix jbssfelix is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Central Park
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBoot View Post
YUK! Just noticed the AeroMexico and Volaris numbers for January...and they are pretty bad in terms of passenger load factor.

Are those flights to MEX and GDL daily flights?
I can only imagine it slowing even more with President Cheeto's immigration policy that has since took effect.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2998  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2017, 12:53 AM
Austin1971 Austin1971 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 827
[q

Last edited by Austin1971; Jan 23, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2999  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2017, 2:48 AM
DoubleC's Avatar
DoubleC DoubleC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 309
Yip, mainline aircraft is just too much for any Mexican route (save for maybe seasonal and leisure routes). Expect Volaris to pull out considering they won't be getting smaller sized aircraft just for 1 route, unless they push for more regional service.

Keep the new routes comin . Maybe tomorrow we'll get a new one too lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3000  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2017, 5:19 AM
brando brando is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 298
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleC View Post
Yip, mainline aircraft is just too much for any Mexican route (save for maybe seasonal and leisure routes). Expect Volaris to pull out considering they won't be getting smaller sized aircraft just for 1 route, unless they push for more regional service.

Keep the new routes comin . Maybe tomorrow we'll get a new one too lol.
No!!!! I need a Austin to Monterrey flight!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:39 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.