HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #981  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2020, 2:10 AM
citybooster citybooster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 420
Quote:
Originally Posted by C. View Post
Spoke too soon.



What I can tell is the buildings have been reduced by 5 floors from the version submitted to the city.

Image from https://www.cityrealty.com/ via https://www.mvmkarchitecture.com/ - You all also have to visit this main page for a beautiful flyover of 622 and 628 Summit Avenue, Jersey City!!!
Wow... very nice! Even though it appears with the applications indeed they did lop off five stories, from each, hopefully the basic essence of the design will remain. Very nice! And great to have a sizable public plaza/park in that area as well. Will look at the site for the other buildings on Summit Avenue and of course look forward to all the developments coming up throughout the city in the coming years!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #982  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2020, 5:14 PM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,014
2 Hoboken Info can be found here:

https://data.jerseycitynj.gov/explor...e/information/

Looks like the number of units. Also made a thread here: https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/sho...39#post9015539
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #983  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2020, 1:02 AM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,014
Completed / Topped Out
99 Hudson Street | residential | 76 floors | topped out
Journal Squared Tower II | residential | 72 floors | topped out
Urban Ready Living I | residential | 69 floors | completed
25 Columbus (The Charlotte) | residential/school | 57 floors | topped out
Journal Squared Tower I | residential | 54 floors | completed
65 Bay Street | residential | 50 floors | completed
70 Columbus Plaza | residential | 50 floors | completed
90 Columbus Plaza | residential | 50 floors | completed
33 Park II | residential | 44 floors | topped out
351 Marin Boulevard II | residential | 38 floors | almost topped out
VYV II | residential | 35 floors | completed
The Ellipse | residential | 33 floors | completed
700 Washington Boulevard I | residential | 24 floors | topped out
289 Jordan Ave | residential | 16 floors | topped out
87 Newkirk St | residential | 14 Floors | completed
3 Journal Square Plaza | residential | 13 floors | completed
175 Second Street | residential | 13 floors | topped out
700 Washington Boulevard II | residential | 12 floors | topped out


Under Construction
331 Marin Boulevard I | residential | 41 floors | under construction
88 Regent St | residential | 32 floors | under construction
28 Cottage | residential | 27 floors | under construction
Emerson Lofts I | residential | 26 floors | under construction
345 Baldwin | residential | 13 floors | under construction


Approved
444 Washington Boulevard | residential | 70 floors | approved
Urban Ready Living II | residential | 69 floors | approved
242 Hudson Street (Harbourside XIII) | residential | 68 floors | proposed
Urban Ready Living III | residential | 65 floors | approved
Journal Squared Tower III | residential | 60 floors | approved
560 Marin Blvd | residential | 59 floors | approved
580 Marin Blvd | residential | 57 floors | approved
808 Pavonia I | residential | 57 floors | approved
808 Pavonia II | residential | 51 floors | approved
500 Summit Ave | mixed use | 42 floors | approved
Provost Square III | mixed-use | 33 floors | approved
30 Park Lane North | residential | 33 floors | approved
414 Hoboken Avenue (Bergen Arch Plaza I) | residential | 28 floors | approved
414 Hoboken Avenue (Bergen Arch Plaza II) | residential | 28 floors | approved
622 Summit | residential | 27 floors | approved
630-632 Newark Ave | mixed use | 27 floors | approved
Journal Square Urby | residential | 25 floors | approved
St Lucy's Redevelopment | residential | 23 floors | approved
165-173 Academy St | mixed | 18 floors | approved
32 Oakland | residential | 14 floors | approved
232-238 Sip Ave | mixed | 14 floors | approved
44-48 Newkirk Ave | residential | 12 floors | approved
96-110 Tonnele Ave | residential |12 floors | approved

Proposed
107 Morgan | residential | 60+ floors | proposed
Pier Six V | residential | 51 floors | proposed
Laurel-Saddlewood Redevelopment | residential | 50 floors | proposed
Sixth Street Embankment I | residential | 45 floors | proposed
Pier Six IV | residential | 39 floors | proposed
Harborside Plaza IV | office | 38 floors | proposed
Sixth Street Embankment II | residential | 35 floors | proposed
Pier Six I | residential | 33 floors | proposed
Pier Six II | residential | 33 floors | proposed
Pier Six III | residential | 33 floors | proposed
415-435 Summit Avenue | mixed-use | 27 floors | proposed
29 Van Reipen Avenue | residential | 27 floors | proposed
33-35 Van Reipen Avenue | residential | 27 floors | proposed
262 Johnson Avenue | mixed-use | 25 floors | proposed
177 Grand Street I | residential | 22 floors | proposed
177 Grand Street II | residential | 16 floors | proposed
2 Hoboken Ave | residential | 13 floors | proposed
One Grove | residential | 12 floors | proposed
20 Carbon Place I |residential | 12 floors | proposed
20 Carbon Place II |residential | 12 floors | proposed
Bates St Redevelopment | mixed-use | ?? floors | proposed
Pier Six Development | residential | ?? floors | proposed
Journal Square PATH Station Redevelopment | mixed-use | ?? floors | proposed


Stalled
30 Journal Square Plaza | residential | 72 floors | stalled
One Journal Square I | residential | 56 floors | stalled
One Journal Square II | residential | 56 floors | stalled
101 Newkirk St. | residential | 50 floors | stalled
180 Baldwin Ave | mixed-use | 25 floors | stalled
448-466 Grand St | residential | 13 floors | stalled
Crescent Park | mixed-use | ?? floors | stalled


Dead Proposals
55 Hudson Street | commercial | 95 floors | dead
Liberty Rising | hotel | 95 floors | dead
Montgomery Tower (30 Montgomery Street) | mixed-use | 70 floors | dead
San Remo | residential | 61 floors | dead
Powerhouse Tower | residential | 40 floors | dead
693-701 Newark Avenue | hotel | 25 floors | dead
688 Montgomery | mixed-use | 22 floors | dead


To Be Sorted
144 First St | residential | 12 floors
619 Marin Blvd | residential | 24 floors
286 Coles St | 21 floors
305 Coles St | residential | 12 floors x 2
2973 JFK Blvd | 20 floors
407-413 Summit Ave | residential | 19 floors
417 Communipaw Avenue | 20 floors
711 Montgomery St | 16 floors
1075 West Side Ave | 13 floors x 2
100 Colden Street | 12 floors
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #984  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2020, 1:02 AM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,014
Big Pier Six news - which can be found here: https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=242855
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #985  
Old Posted Sep 4, 2020, 1:03 AM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,014
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #986  
Old Posted Oct 14, 2020, 3:22 PM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,014
Two twelve story buildings coming to 3085 Kennedy Blvd. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iKk...nF6XJMg1l/view

Just south of 1/9.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #987  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2020, 12:02 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,696
@ C ,

I transferred that master list to the 1st post. Updated 1st post of this compilation.

Just as this compilation grows, because Jersey City is booming, so that master list doesn't get lost in the flurry of the boom, it'll be the 1st post (with the active thread links).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #988  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2020, 4:20 PM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
@ C ,

I transferred that master list to the 1st post. Updated 1st post of this compilation.

Just as this compilation grows, because Jersey City is booming, so that master list doesn't get lost in the flurry of the boom, it'll be the 1st post (with the active thread links).
Great Thanks!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #989  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2020, 4:21 PM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,014
I see that the One Journal Square developer and the City have resolved their differences and the project is now approved.
https://hudsoncountyview.com/jersey-...ax-abatements/

I doubt they will be breaking ground anytime soon due to the economy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #990  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2020, 12:38 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,696
I just hope its not back to square one on that project. Seems like the saga continues with that project.

Am kind of hoping Journal Square will be the next LIC.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #991  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2020, 12:50 AM
Crawford Crawford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,551
Groundbreaking is scheduled for Spring 2021. This is finally gonna rise. Took long enough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #992  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2020, 1:19 PM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,014
Both towers are now 710 ft and will be 64 floors.

I remember at one point that One Journal Square was planned to be the second tallest in Jersey City after 99 Hudson: 892 ft and 79 floors.

https://newyorkyimby.com/2016/08/one...ight-bump.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #993  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2020, 2:37 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,302
It's okay, they didnt need to be that tall, JC has plenty of potential many many more towers of this height around Journal Square.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #994  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2020, 12:24 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,696
Mixed-Income ‘Fairview Apartments’ Plus Community Center Could Rise in Jersey City



Quote:
The Community Builders, a New York nonprofit that owns and manages more than 11,000 apartments throughout the country, is hoping to revitalize irregularly shaped properties at 43-49 Fairview Avenue and 209 Monticello Avenue. Their plan will both tear down and preserve some historic buildings at the site, which the YMCA once used for recreational programs.

To move forward, The Community Builders is seeking authorization to demolish a gymnasium and a racquetball building that date to 1920 and 1950, respectively. The nonprofit’s plan would keep a two-story pool building on the land intact while constructing a nine-story mid-rise dubbed Fairview Apartments on a current parking area.

The new structure, designed by Inglese Architecture & Engineering and set to rise just under 100 feet, would include 92 units. 55% of them, or 50 apartments, would be set aside as affordable housing for residents earning up to 60% of Area Median Income, while the remainder would have market-rate rents.
===============
Jersey Digs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #995  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2020, 12:27 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,696
Board Approves Plans for Eight-Story Building Along Route 440 in Jersey City, New Renderings Released



Quote:
Plans by a Florida company to bring an eight-story development alongside a major thoroughfare in Jersey City’s Ward A can now move forward.

The Jersey City Planning Board unanimously approved Fort Lauderdale-based Leontarakis JC-440 Real Estate, LLC’s application with conditions during its meeting on October 13.

Located diagonally across Route 440 from The Home Depot near the Bayfront site, the property is situated on what a recent Jersey City Division of City Planning staff report described as an “island lot” surrounded by the highway, Kellogg Street, and an access road.

If the building ultimately ends up being constructed as approved, it would include 119 one-bedroom units, 35 two-bedroom units, and four three-bedroom units, but the application shows that there would not be any “affordable housing.”
====================
Jersey Digs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #996  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2020, 3:57 PM
citybooster citybooster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 420
The design is great, but the rendering makes me laugh because I pass by that site every day going to work. The real site is comparable to an island strip in the middle of a busy highway stretch. No trees or grass... plenty of cars though. Right next though a huge piece of land going to become the Bayfront development. There was a diner that later became a Mexican restaurant located there for decades, and that kind of use of the property seems more organic because it is basically surrounded by roads. I just am having a hard time seeing people really buying into renting at that particular location.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #997  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2020, 8:32 PM
C. C. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by citybooster View Post
The design is great, but the rendering makes me laugh because I pass by that site every day going to work. The real site is comparable to an island strip in the middle of a busy highway stretch. No trees or grass... plenty of cars though. Right next though a huge piece of land going to become the Bayfront development. There was a diner that later became a Mexican restaurant located there for decades, and that kind of use of the property seems more organic because it is basically surrounded by roads. I just am having a hard time seeing people really buying into renting at that particular location.


When Bayfront is close to being 100% built out and the light rail station is operational up the street, I can then see this property potentially work. No way it happens before then.

*EDIT*

It's amazing how out of whack the real estate market is. For malarkey and giggles, I used padmapper to find what nearby properties rent for.

Newer construction
2 bed, 1 bath in Society Hill - $2,200

Older construction
2 bed, 1 bath on West Side Avenue - $1,595 to 1,700

A new construction building will easily get above $1,600 if that's the competition. :-/


All images from JerseyDigs.com

Last edited by C.; Oct 27, 2020 at 8:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #998  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2020, 4:33 AM
citybooster citybooster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 420
Okay, lol... there ARE a couple of little trees, let me get that out of the way. But someone looking at both renditions pictured, compared with the idyllic original one, would be in for quite a bit of a shock.

That is actually a far better rendition of the site if it's ideally realized. I agree though it is much more feasable once they get the first phase of Bayfront off the ground(not necessarily completely built out, but at least first phase being complete)From what I read, actual construction is more likely mid 2022 at best, and likely later. Possibly, as you indicate, quite a bit later. But yeah the lightrail too has to be operational... they have to revise this to eliminate more parking. I also really hope they redevelop the huge Home Depot/Raymour and Flanagan lot across the street...one story superstores seem an incredible waste of land... who knows if the redevelop the 440 Plaza behind it too, but that should be considered.

Architecturally, it really does like very nice. I see the NJCU development nearby and the two bedrooms there actually push $2,800- $3,200 and this is nowhere near the downtown waterfront, which would actually command those prices on this side of the Hudson. Prices REALLY are out of whack... $1,500-$1,700 for two bedrooms in an older dwelling is starting to get a bit pricey.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #999  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2020, 5:01 AM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 9,093
I don't know, La Mexicana has architectural preservation and Historic Monument status written all over it...
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1000  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2020, 6:08 AM
NYC2ATX's Avatar
NYC2ATX NYC2ATX is offline
Everywhere all at once
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SI NYC
Posts: 2,448
Honestly that end of JC has SOOOOO MUCH potential and I, for one, hope this is the first of many such proposals for the area. If they were smart and proactive they would get on to extending the HBLR one more station to serve the area with public transport connections. After all, waterfront is waterfront, and this land is underdeveloped.

You all know anyway that Bayonne already meets the regions exurban strip mall power center needs...ironically also along Rte 440.
__________________
BUILD IT. BUILD EVERYTHING. BUILD IT ALL.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:00 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.