Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronPGH
And that "sketchy" leather bar happens to be an extremely important piece of Pittsburgh's rapidly disappearing LGBTQ history that our community has fought to save and preserve. In fact, recently it changed owners and has been able to be revived, which I would consider a rare win.
Do we have to develop everything just because? Or maybe are there some times where you say "this is a piece of culture, it isn't worth destroying" and you figure out another way? I realize it may hurt your eyes to look at it, but there are more components to the "value" of something than how many condos have been crammed into a spot.
Maybe it's more important for Pittsburgh to have ONE leather bar left rather than demolish it for another generic block of LIVE WORK PLAY.
|
Oh don't be so self-righteous, man. It's just a bar. And, btw, it's a part of the "rapidly disappearing LGBTQ community history" because those same LGBTQ community members have stopped going. Like, sometimes "community" members can be so cringe in that they identify some niche bar as a significant cultural place like it's Rosa Parks' bus seat. Most gay people aren't into leather and/or always going to the same bars that all offered the exact same music, drinks, and people and that's why they're fading away, not because of some external conspiracy to close them all down. Now, I agree that I don't want to tear anything down just to replace with the same ish you can find anywhere in town. That being said, dragging out your soapbox to give some bleary-eyed eulogy to gay bar subcultures that don't have a clientele anymore is silly.
The lot is unnecessarily downzowned. It could be developed with a higher and better use. That may or may not include a leather bar. The world will survive without it or another will open if there is enough demand. No need to wistfully pontificate about a leather bar like he suggested tearing down an active women's shelter.