HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2016, 9:59 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by nixcity View Post
Again, this is quite easy to come up with, they had the exact positions of the stations, which is what was used recently for the estimates
No, they didn't.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4U...d5YTVTY0U/view

"Station points were determined as a part of a follow-on study by Capital Metro in 2001 titled The Rapid Transit

Project but were not defined for the proposal in 2000."

The 2000 vote hadn't even gotten that far yet.


Quote:
Originally Posted by nixcity View Post
and as shown here by Mr. Henry, the alignment would be able to retain 2 lanes of traffic for most of it.
https://austinrailnow.com/2014/12/09...amar-corridor/
And the final plans and alignment would be extremely easy to finalize for this route.
.
Again, this is post hoc and wasn't done for the 2000 vote.

Notice the "Graphic: ARN."
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:26 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.