HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 7:21 AM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,262
AUSTIN: Update on the Seaholm Power redevelopment



Austin nearer to transforming Seaholm

City to get look at plans for $100 million redevelopment while negotiating final public-private deal.



By Shonda Novak
AUSTIN AMERICAN-STATESMAN
Thursday, February 01, 2007


Developers are expected to roll out today their vision for a mixed-use project that would transform the former Seaholm Power Plant into shops, offices, a hotel and condominiums by 2009.

The Austin City Council will get its first look at a new rendering of the project, which features a modern design while retaining the distinctive Art Deco building and its five signature smokestacks.

The decommissioned 1940s plant sits on about 8 acres along West Cesar Chavez Street overlooking Town Lake.

An adjacent 22-story residential/hotel tower and two-story office building also would have a modern design but with an Art Deco flavor.

The project is a joint venture between the City of Austin and Seaholm Power LLC, which the city in 2005 tapped as its partner to oversee redevelopment of the landmark site.

Construction, which would cost more than $100 million, is expected to begin this fall. The first parts of the project are expected to open in mid-2009.

The rendering illustrates just how dramatic the transformation of the iconic plant and surrounding land would be.

The 136,000-square-foot building that housed the power plant would have 99,000 square feet of rentable retail space, with a mix of local, regional and national tenants plus restaurants and cafes.

The residential/hotel tower would loom over the original Seaholm structure, featuring 60 condo units on the top seven floors of a 160-room boutique hotel. The condo owners would have concierge and valet services and other amenities of the hotel.

The project also would include a two-story office building with 62,000 square feet. Two terraces will be used by residents of the hotel and condos, as well as the public.

More than 3 acres of the site would be preserved as as green space. Seaholm also would be a transportation hub, with future commercial rail connections, including a line between Austin and San Antonio.

Southwest Strategies Group, an Austin-based commercial real estate company, is leading the redevelopment team. Seaholm Power LLC is in the final stages of negotiating a development agreement with the City of Austin for the project.

"This is an historic event and an opportunity for saving a slice of Austin's history," said John Rosato, managing partner of Seaholm Power LLC. "It's the first time that the city has entered into a public-private venture for the sole purpose of saving an iconic building in Austin."

Assistant City Manager Laura Huffman said, "We view this as a pivotal opportunity for revitalizing downtown" and realizing a longtime goal for a transit hub at Seaholm.

Huffman said the city will make "significant investments in the project," although details are still being worked out.

Huffman said increased property and sales taxes generated from the development would be used to fund the city's portion of the project, which will be spelled out in the development agreement.

Once those investments are paid off, the city would devote 40 percent of the incremental property taxes to affordable housing, Huffman said.

Rosato said other community benefits of the redevelopment include the planned extension of West Second Street to Seaholm.

Two other Austin-based companies, Centro Partners and La Corsha Hospitality Group, round out the redevelopment team.

Centro would develop the condos. Units could cost from about $450,000 for about 1,200 square feet to more than $1 million for the largest 3,000-square-foot units, Rosato said.

Jeff Trigger, former managing director of the historic Driskill Hotel in downtown Austin, would oversee the construction, management and operations of the Seaholm Plaza Hotel, to be built just north of the former power plant, through La Corsha, his newly formed hotel management and consulting company.

snovak@statesman.com; 445-3856


*CLICK HERE TO VIEW MORE RENDERINGS...*
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 1:44 PM
Mopacs's Avatar
Mopacs Mopacs is offline
Austinite
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austin.TX.USA
Posts: 4,585
Great to see this development finally coming together. The condo/hotel keeps getting taller with every successive rendering released. The cluster of high-rises under construction and proposed for the SW quadrant of downtown is going to be impressive.
__________________
Austin.Texas.USA
Home of the 2005 National Champion Texas Longhorns
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 3:05 PM
TDoss's Avatar
TDoss TDoss is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 176
Who are the retail tenants?????

Does anybody know what tenants they are going after?

I really hope that there are some phenomenal tenants in this property---
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 3:23 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by TDoss View Post
Does anybody know what tenants they are going after?

I really hope that there are some phenomenal tenants in this property---
What type of businesses would you like to see?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 3:41 PM
TDoss's Avatar
TDoss TDoss is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 176
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 4:03 PM
Mopacs's Avatar
Mopacs Mopacs is offline
Austinite
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austin.TX.USA
Posts: 4,585
Man I would love to see Trader Joes expand into Austin, whether at Seaholm or anywhere for that matter. Nice, cheaper alternative to Whole Foods. The California transplants will especially appreciate it.
__________________
Austin.Texas.USA
Home of the 2005 National Champion Texas Longhorns
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 4:10 PM
rad707 rad707 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 269
Trader Joes isn't coming. Guero's lobbied them for the new space on South Congress, and they indicated they don't want to expand into WF's back yard.

but even if they did, they wouldn't move in three blocks away from WF's headquarters.

on the other hand, a bowling alley would be sweet. there isn't one for miles from downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 4:10 PM
MichaelB MichaelB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North edge of Downtown
Posts: 3,208
H&m, H&m, H&m!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 4:17 PM
Mopacs's Avatar
Mopacs Mopacs is offline
Austinite
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Austin.TX.USA
Posts: 4,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by rad707 View Post
on the other hand, a bowling alley would be sweet. there isn't one for miles from downtown.
Man I second that! Lucky Strike would be a great fit in the downtown area. Many moons ago, there was a bowling alley at the corner of Barton Springs and Lamar, behind McDonalds and Peter Pan Mini Golf (later became an Office depot and a music store). As a kid, I had a birthday party there.
__________________
Austin.Texas.USA
Home of the 2005 National Champion Texas Longhorns
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 4:49 PM
78705 78705 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 41
Actually, East Avenue Investment Group (the guys redeveloping the Concordia property) have been talking to Trader Joes about coming to that location. I don't know if they are making any progress, but they were still talking to them a month or two ago. Of course, that wouldn't open up until probably at least late 2009...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 4:56 PM
78705 78705 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 41
Transit center info at Seaholm???

What's up with the transportation hub description on the Seaholm site? They are either really really overmarketing, or they know something the rest of us don't. They state:

Quote:
...will provide direct access to the Austin’s renowned Hike and Bike Trail, as well as to the rest of the City via the planned streetcar and commuter rail lines, both of which will have stops at Seaholm along 3rd St.
This would be excellently excellent, if true. I think it's probably much more likely that they're taking immense liberty with the term "planned," though...

M1Ek - have you heard anything about new plans for rail & streetcar to this site?

http://www.seaholm.info/html/leasing.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 4:58 PM
TDoss's Avatar
TDoss TDoss is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 176
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAM View Post
What type of businesses would you like to see?
I am such a dummy!

I cannot believe I forgot to add this tenant to my Seaholm wishlist

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XbCWmY0eqY
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2007, 6:12 PM
M1EK's Avatar
M1EK M1EK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by 78705 View Post
M1Ek - have you heard anything about new plans for rail & streetcar to this site?

http://www.seaholm.info/html/leasing.html
No, I'm out of the loop on this one. All I've heard is that Council is highly dubious about paying for streetcar (which is what Cap Metro expects them to do); and that there were some meetings about trying to preserve the existing rail alignments at Seaholm.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2007, 6:15 PM
tildahat tildahat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by M1EK View Post
No, I'm out of the loop on this one. All I've heard is that Council is highly dubious about paying for streetcar (which is what Cap Metro expects them to do); and that there were some meetings about trying to preserve the existing rail alignments at Seaholm.
A friend of mine just got appointed to the UTC, I'll see if I can get any inside info. Though maybe the UTC doesn't really get any inside info?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2007, 3:43 PM
M1EK's Avatar
M1EK M1EK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by tildahat View Post
A friend of mine just got appointed to the UTC, I'll see if I can get any inside info. Though maybe the UTC doesn't really get any inside info?
I have plenty of friends still on the UTC... but most of the time we were in the dark too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2007, 6:31 PM
tildahat tildahat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 193
Quote:
Originally Posted by M1EK View Post
I have plenty of friends still on the UTC... but most of the time we were in the dark too.
Not surprising I guess...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2007, 10:40 PM
Gallup's Avatar
Gallup Gallup is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 96
That is wownerful!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted May 5, 2007, 10:41 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Seaholm Ready for Rebirth

BY AMY SMITH

The on-again, off-again dream of turning the Seaholm Power Plant into a cultural facility reappeared on the City Council's radar last week, setting into motion (again) a plan to try and realize that goal. Council Member Betty Dunkerley is taking the lead this time, and is asking city staff to issue a request for proposals to solicit bids for the Art Deco structure's afterlife. City Manager Toby Futrell tells us that such an RFP should be ready to go within 60 days.
Dunkerley said it made sense to get the Seaholm RFP in circulation while the city is also seeking a suitor for Block 21 – currently Downtown's most eligible vacant property, because of its key location across from the new City Hall. Like Seaholm, Block 21 is being touted as a prospective home for a showcase mixed-use development that includes cultural attractions; together, the two city-owned sites are seen as potential anchors for a cultural destination district on Downtown's west side. "A lot of different groups are looking at space in the Downtown area, so it made sense to me to get [the RFPs] out at the same time," Dunkerley said. "I thought it would be a better way to bring this to the table."

Most of the high-profile civic institutions looking for potential Downtown homes – including a new central library, the Austin Museum of Art, KLRU-TV and Austin City Limits, and the new Texas Music Hall of Fame – have been discussed as potential Seaholm users. However, the Austin Children's Museum, once considered a favorite to occupy the structure, likely won't submit an RFP, said museum director Gwen Crider. "From my reading of it, the development cost would be more than what we can afford," she said. The museum is, however, continuing its search for a larger site in the Downtown area, she added.

Dunkerley says a major interest now is to find a suitable home for a new central library – which will almost certainly not be on Block 21, its onetime designated site, and not necessarily at the power plant. "My personal feeling is that I am not sure if [Seaholm] would be a perfect fit for the library, but I know there are a lot of people who believe it is." Perhaps most vocal among them is the mayor's wife, Anne Elizabeth Wynn, though her colleagues on the Austin Public Library Foundation board are also looking at other options. Seaholm is smaller than the 350,000-square-feet-plus library supporters feel a new central library should contain, though Wynn has touted the possibility of using Seaholm as Phase 1 of a multibuilding library campus.

In addition to a cultural facility, Seaholm – site of Downtown's existing rail hub – would likely also include a transportation center, an idea strongly supported by Dunkerley's colleagues Daryl Slusher (a Capital Metro board member) and Brewster McCracken. "Seaholm is just crying out to be the classic central city rail station," McCracken told the Chronicle. "It's necessary to make commuter rail, and rail-based mass transit, succeed in the Downtown area."

Once the city has settled on a suitor for Seaholm, then it's all over but the waiting. The power plant has been in varying stages of environmental remediation over the last few years, with completion scheduled in 2006.

http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrob...d=oid%3A205080
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 1:25 AM
Saddle Man Saddle Man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,149
Why is there a new post about Seaholm from 2004? LOL!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted May 6, 2007, 10:56 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingkirbythegreat View Post
Why is there a new post about Seaholm from 2004? LOL!
Yeah, sorry about that. I didn't check the date on the news. Was just so excited to see some!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:34 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.