HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Engineering


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted May 20, 2011, 7:52 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted May 21, 2011, 12:29 AM
C.Lan C.Lan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 82
I wonder how expenses tie into development as far as the materials they're using go?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2011, 5:42 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
On a lighter note:
Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2011, 2:43 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
In fusion race, lightning thunders over lasers
July 11, 2011 by Derek Shannon

In presentations at the gathering of over one thousand scientists—the 38th International Conference on Plasma Science—the NIF researchers reported producing an impressive 400 trillion neutrons from the fusion reactions in their best experiments. But NIF uses a lot of energy to accomplish this feat, some 422 million joules of electric energy. To understand that energy, imagine the energy of motion of 400 one-ton vehicles all moving at 100 miles per hour. Instead of actual vehicles colliding, picture that energy used to generate laser light and focus it on a pellet of frozen deuterium and tritium fusion fuel. (Deuterium and tritium, or DT for short, are isotopes of hydrogen.) That’s the energy NIF uses to generate its neutrons.

At LPP’s much more modest research facility, fusion is generated by a device called a dense plasma focus. LPP’s Focus Fusion-1 (“FoFu-1”) device uses a much smaller amount of electric energy, and instead of powering lasers, this electricity flows directly to electrodes in a central vacuum chamber where it kinks and twists itself to confine a small ball of plasma. In other words, sitting in a space the size of a small garage, FoFu-1 unleashes a bolt of lightning that lassos itself into a knot, and LPP’s patented approach appears to be much more efficient in generating those all-important fusion reactions. FoFu-1’s best experiments required less than a tenth of one-percent the energy NIF used—thirty-five thousand joules instead of over four hundred million—but still generated 130 billion fusion neutrons. How can we compare these large numbers? Ultimately, any fusion device that produces net energy has to produce more fusion energy than is fed in, so fusion neutrons per joule is a good overall measure of success. NIF produces just a bit less than a million neutrons per joule of energy. FoFu-1 has produced 3.7 million neutrons per joule, almost 4 times better than NIF.

A truly fair comparison is even more favorable to lightning over lasers, since FoFu-1 has the disadvantage of using pure deuterium fuel (with the reaction represented as DD), not the deuterium mixed with tritium (DT) used by NIF. Since DT is much easier to burn as a fusion fuel, this gives NIF a major advantage. If FoFu-1 achieved the same conditions with DT fuel as it had with DD, it would have achieved results some 60 times better than NIF. But LPP has even bigger plans—Instead of NIF’s radioactive tritium, the company will instead be transitioning to the fuel of regular hydrogen and the common element boron, a reaction which in itself doesn’t make any neutrons at all. This gives LPP’s technology another huge advantage, because it completely avoids the generation of any nuclear waste, while allowing for cheap conversion of fusion energy directly into electricity.


http://lawrencevilleplasmaphysics.co...sers&Itemid=90
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2011, 5:15 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Experiments underway! Fusion device upgrade complete
August 14, 2011 by Derek Shannon




Kansas State grad students Mohamed Ismail (left) and Amgad Mohamed stack layers of green boratron above FoFu’s freshly reassembled and reinforced main insulator, made up of carefully cut sheets of Mylar. These are sandwiched between new aluminum plates (grey).

With the switches and insulation tested, the team is now optimizing and testing the third key element of the upgrade—the cathode knife-edge. To start current flowing through the gas in the vacuum chamber, the atoms in the gas must be ionized—their electrons stripped off and made free to move. This creates the plasma, which is electrically conducting gas. The knife edge, located on the inner ring of the cathode plate, initiates the ionization.

FF-1’s first cathode had a row of tungsten pins instead of a knife edge, which proved inadequate, because the pins got loose and became uneven in height. This caused asymmetric firing (see June report). An alternative solid copper knife edge, already manufactured, was available for testing this summer. However, experiments conducted by LPP in collaboration with Texas A & M University in 2001 and discussions this month with LPP contractor John Guillory both indicated that a solid knife edge could produce inadequate ionization and trap neutral, un-ionized, gas behind the sheath of current filaments. This in turn would allow current to wander away from the sheaths, hurting their formation. So, imitating the modification successfully made in the Texas experiments, the new knife-edge has slots cut into it. These will allow the escape of gas from the region inside the knife edge, and the sharp corners of the remaining knife edge segments will increase ionization. The new modification will also be tested in August.


The fully assembled central electrodes with new anode (central cylinder, left) and new cathode base with knife edge for symmetrical plasma sheath formation (close-up at right).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2011, 2:04 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
The New Breed of Energy Catalyzers: Ready for Commercialization?
On August 16, 2011, in Blog, by David Niebauer



There has been quite a bit of activity lately in the field that used to be referred to as “cold fusion” and is now generally called “low energy nuclear reactions (LENR)”. Many experiments over the last 22 years following the pioneering efforts of Pons and Fleishman in 1989 have generated excess heat – but its still not clear that what is being observed is a nuclear reaction. It is becoming clear, however, that scientists and engineers are closing in on generating significant and useful thermal energy from the reactions. Given recent developments, I thought it would be useful to do a brief survey of companies that are moving this technology to commercialization.

Because the established scientific community confronts this field with a high degree of skepticism, the road to commercialization is particularly difficult. The main hurdle appears to be finding a financing partner willing to step out in front of the developments while the theoretical underpinnings are still being worked out. At this stage, there appears to be no question that excess heat is being generated by the best experiments. Whether these results can be translated into commercial success, however, is still to be seen.

More about Andrea Rossi/Leonardo Corporation, Robert Godes/Brillouin Energy Corporation, Energetics Technologies, and Star Scientific Limited at:

http://www.cleantechblog.com/2011/08...alization.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2011, 4:38 AM
STR's Avatar
STR STR is offline
Because I'm Clever!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,087
I had a conversation with a rocket scientist on another forum a while back. Apparently they're taking a Polywell coil and, by making the EM fields asymmetrical, you can get the plasma to move in a given direction. That, naturally, creates thrust. Quite a bit actually, with thrust and specific impulse (essentially efficiency) in between the high thrust/low sp chemical rockets and the low thrust/high sp of ion engines.

You don't need a fusion reaction to power such a device. Indeed, since you're using an asymmetric field, you probably cannot achieve fusion efficiently.
__________________
There are six phases to every project 1) enthusiasm, 2) disillusionment, 3) panic, 4) search for the guilty, 5) punishment of the innocent, 6) praise for the non-participants. - Guy Tozzoli
Build your own Model Skyscrapers** New York City 2015 3D Model W/ New WTC ** World Trade Center (1971-2001) 3D Model
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2011, 7:27 AM
Trantor's Avatar
Trantor Trantor is offline
FUS RO DAH!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Ecumenopolis
Posts: 16,234
all your questions about Polywell can be talked over www.talk-polywell.org
__________________
________________________________________
Easy, Tychus. This ain´t science fiction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2011, 2:12 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506


Swedish Ny Teknik assists with self sustained e-cat test and shows pictures of the 1 megawatt cold fusion unit
September 16, 2011

Swedish Ny Teknik assisted recently in a test where the ‘E-cat’ invented by Andrea Rossi was run in self-sustained mode
. Ny Teknik ("New Technology") is a weekly Swedish newspaper and website.

At the new test, the E-cat was first run for 90 minutes assisted with a thermal electric power input of 2.6 kilowatts. The electric power was then cut off and the E-cat continued to operate for 35 minutes without external energy input.

The test was subsequently terminated at our request, for practical reasons and time constraints. It would otherwise have continued, and according to Rossi the electrical resistance would then have been switched in at full power (27 kilowatts) for ten minutes after each time interval of 30 minutes with self-sustained operation.

During the test a new model of the E-cat was used, the one that has been implemented in the one-megawatt plant that according to Rossi will be launched in the U.S. in October.


Rossi's one megawatt heat plant in a 20 foot container (click on the images). Foto: Mats Lewan

The Rossi 1 megawatt unit is written up at Ny Teknik

Ny Teknik got a look at the plant last week in Bologna, where it had been assembled from parts supposedly manufactured in Rossis’s factory in Miami, Florida.

The plant consists of 52 ‘E-cats’ of a new model that Rossi says he developed this spring, partly through discussions with the Swedish physicists Sven Kullander and Hanno Essen, mainly regarding research done by Hidetsugu Ikegami, a professor emeritus at Osaka University in Japan.

Rossi newest ecat units reach 27 kilowatts of power output. He discarded the previously manufactured units. The 52 units were mounted in four rows along both sides of a 20-foot container.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2011, 4:13 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Rossi is having another e-cat demonstration on Oct 6.

---



Breaking records and window

September 30, 2011 by Aaron Blake

With all switches firing and central components cleaned, realigned, and in some cases even resurfaced, Focus Fusion-1 (FoFu-1) has pushed the frontier of DPF functioning to record pressures of fill gas. This is a prerequisite for achieving high fusion yields. The yield increases with the plasma density in the tiny plasmoid where fusion is produced, and for a given type of gas, this density is proportional to the fill gas pressure. While no other DPF has achieved fusion reactions at fill pressures above 30 Torr, and FoFu-1 had previously only done this once, on Sept. 12, LPP's device achieved fusion reaction at these high pressures in 10 shots, including several times at 44 Torr and a single shot over 75 Torr.

BrokenWindowSince atmospheric pressure is around 760 Torr, this is fusion at roughly 10% of atmospheric pressure, truly putting the "dense" in dense plasma focus. For comparison, a tokamak fusion machine generally operates at just one thousandth of a single Torr. The shock wave from a blast of fusion at 75 Torr was too much for this glass window (pictured at right), but its quartz replacement should be able to take the pressure.



Equally important, the first day's firing showed a very tight correlation between the height of the voltage spike that occurs at the time of the pinch, when the plasma is compressed into the plasmoid, and the amount of fusion energy produced (see fig. 1 below). When this pinch and compression occur, the voltage spike is a measure of the energy being transferred from FoFu-1's capacitors into the plasmoid.



Figure 1. FoFu-1’s fusion yield, measured in billions of neutrons produced, is tightly correlated with the height of the voltage spike (see fig. 2) in new shots performed after the tungsten pins on the cathode plate were aligned (blue line on left). Those shots were at the record gas filling pressure of 42-44 Torr and capacitor charge of 34 kV. The slope shows that fusion yield scales with spike voltage to the 2.73 power. By comparison, many shots with unaligned pins produced a correlation with much more scatter that levels off at high pinch height (green line on right).

This correlation, which continued on the second day of firing, is significant for two reasons. Its straightness on the log-log plot shows that fusion yield is increasing steadily almost with the cube of pinch height. These act like an arrow on a map, pointing to what the best yields at this current are likely to be. With the largest typical voltage spikes at 50 kV, fusion yields should be over 1 joule (about 1012 neutrons), exactly what our theory projects. The agreement of our theoretical projection with the extrapolation of the experimental curve gives us increased confidence in both. Second, this tightness of the correlation implies a more repeatable operation of FoFu-1 with its newly realigned tungsten pins (see below for details on the latest refurbishing). Of course, these preliminary results must be confirmed with more shots, but they are encouraging.



Figure 2. In this plot for shot 091511-05 at 44 Torr, the initial voltage spike from the capacitor bank is on the left, while the voltage spike on the right is from the pinch transferring the energy into the plasmoid, where the fusion reactions take place. The height of the pinch spike above the trend of falling voltage in this case is 9.6 kV, making this a small pinch. In a “big pinch” the spike rises as much as 50

In all these shots, the early beam, which had previously reduced yields by interfering with symmetrical compression of the plasma, was completely absent, further supporting that the misalignment of the cathode plate tungsten pins was indeed the cause of this persistent problem.

The shakedown period since completing the FoFu-1 switch upgrades illustrates how routine experimental glitches can be sorted out—with a little determination. Initially, we found that FoFu-1 was not pinching at all—no fusion. Opening the chamber up, we discovered that some grease from the machine shop had accidently been left in tiny screw holes intended to increase the rigidity of the electrodes. When the plasma hit the grease, it spread hydrocarbons all over the machine. When these landed on the insulator, next to where the current sheath first forms, the heavy hydrocarbons contaminated the filaments, slowing them down unevenly and destroying the symmetry necessary for good compression and the high densities needed for fusion reactions.

In addition, we found that the new copper knife-edge was being seriously eroded by the current. The knife edge is where the current starts to flow through the plasma and must be sharp to build up the high electric fields needed to strip the first electrons off the gas, creating the current-carrying plasma. We had thought the copper knife edge would work better than the uneven tungsten pins, but we had not counted on how rapidly the intense current eroded the copper, which has a much lower evaporation temperature than tungsten. So we had the tungsten pins evened out and tried them again.

In the meantime, time was passing, and we wanted new results for the Warsaw conference presentation—but still had no pinches. On a hunch, team member Derek Shannon moved the fill pressure up to first 50, then 60, and then 75 Torr (when the window broke). Such high pressures would slow the plasma sheath, potentially reducing the maximum spread introduced by initial asymmetry. FoFu-1 then generated small pinches at the record high pressures, but results were still far from satisfactory.

After another disassembly and inspection, team member Aaron Blake noticed that there was arcing between the copper cathode plate and the steel plate where it was attached. When arcing occurs due to poor contact between the two metal conductors, sparks form that can eat away at the metal, making the arcing worse. Blake saw that the steel plate had been eaten away and measured the change in surface level as 10-20 mils (thousandths of an inch). Via Skype, he explained the problem to Lerner, already in Warsaw, and together with Shannon, the three agreed that the copper and steel plates needed to be machined smooth again so that they would form a good contact.

Based on the newly smoothed contact and aligned pins, FoFu-1 started producing frequent, if still small, pinches in the new high pressure regime. Repairs were over for the time being, and physics exploration resumed. Twists and turns remain the norm for both plasma filaments and the road to discovery!

http://www.lawrencevilleplasmaphysic...dows&Itemid=90
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2011, 1:23 PM
Wizened Variations's Avatar
Wizened Variations Wizened Variations is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trantor View Post
all your questions about Polywell can be talked over www.talk-polywell.org

Nice to see dreaming physicists, too. Realists are all politicians! (If all were realists, the trees would be a nice place to live in, despite leopards and other predators.)
__________________
Good read on relationship between increasing number of freeway lanes and traffic

http://www.vtpi.org/gentraf.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2011, 5:37 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Wow, Rossi in Forbes:


Hello Cheap Energy, Hello Brave New World
10/17/2011 @ 12:43AM
Mark Gibbs

Over on Network World where I’ve had a gig as a columnist for about 18 years, my Backspin column I wrote this week about a power generation system called E-Cat that is to be tested on October 28th.

If you’ve missed the recent brouhaha over the E-Cat (which stands for Energy Catalyzer), you’re missing out on a three ring circus over a technology that will either change everything or change nothing because what is promised is, in theory, power too cheap to be worth metering.

The E-Cat is a simple device albeit with functioning that defies all known explanations.

In summary, the E-Cat is a cold fusion (CF) device (the inventor, Andrea Rossi, prefers to term the technology “Low Energy Nuclear Reaction” (which appears to be the same thing as CF but a less contentious phrasing). I’ll refer you to my Network World column for a more long-winded explanation of the background and theories about the device.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibb...ave-new-world/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2011, 1:05 AM
THE BIG APPLE's Avatar
THE BIG APPLE THE BIG APPLE is offline
Khurram Parvaz
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 2,424
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwk8I...eature=related" target="_blank">Video Link
__________________
One man with courage is a majority - Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2011, 9:06 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506


New record fusion yields as FoFu-1 shows rapid scaling

Posted in News on October 20, 2011 by Derek Shannon

FF-1 tops its previous 'personal best' record for fusion yield, achieves nearly I^5 scaling with current

We are happy to report that FF-1 achieved a new record with the production of 150 billion neutrons in two shots on October 10. For some time during the recent post-upgrade shakedown, the device had not produced over 100 billion neutrons (1011) repeatably, but this plateau has now been left behind with six shots over this level in two days of firing.

Equally important, the fusion yield has increased in the most recent shot series as I^4.7, very close to the I^5 scaling that LPP’s theory predicts (figure 1). The scaling of fusion yield with current is an extremely important indicator of whether FF-1’s functioning is getting closer to demonstrating the scientific feasibility of Focus Fusion. Energy input increases roughly as I^2, where I is the current, so with output energy scaling at I^4.6, it shows that the ratio of energy input to energy output is increasing rapidly as the input energy is increased. While there remains room for improvement, this is very good news!



The highest current shots of the promising new results were obtained when the LPP research team decided to raise the firing voltage while only using 8 capacitors, to better compare the new, higher current data with that obtained in May, when 8 capacitors were also used. This step from 35kV up to 40 kV will prepare the way for moving up to 45 kV, the highest voltage obtainable with the current device. Once the scaling of the fusion yield with the current is thoroughly understood with 8 capacitors, the team will return to further explore the high-pressure regime first explored last month, using all 12 capacitors. Improvements to FF-1’s ceramic “hat” insulator and related alignment capabilities are now ongoing, with firing expected to resume within a week.

http://www.lawrencevilleplasmaphysic...ling&Itemid=90

Last edited by scalziand; Oct 21, 2011 at 2:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2011, 7:40 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Rossi reportedly tested his 1 MW plant today, and it produced 470kW continuously, and then sold it to an unspecified customer.

http://peswiki.com/index.php/News:Oc...Megawatt_E-Cat

http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/10/ros...catalyzer.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2011, 3:25 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Videos from the test today:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=7sZHOQ6P-Rw" target="_blank">Video Link


Video Link


Copy of the summary report:

http://db.tt/wu4OLbgk
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2011, 12:02 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
So the Navy is possibly interested in Rossi's reactor.





Cold Fusion Experiment: Major Success or Complex Hoax?

By John Brandon
Published November 02, 2011

A physicist in Italy claims to have demonstrated a new type of power plant that provides safe, cheap and virtually unlimited nuclear power to the world, without fossil fuels or radiation concerns.

The only hitch: Scientists say the method -- cold fusion -- is patently impossible. They say it defies the laws of physics.

Andrea Rossi doesn't seem to care. He told FoxNews.com that his new device takes in nickel and hydrogen and fuses them in a low-grade nuclear reaction that essentially spits out sheer power, validating the strange science.

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/...-fusion-plant/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2011, 3:52 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
The Fox News article has been picked up by Discovery:

http://news.discovery.com/tech/cold-fusion-111102.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Nov 4, 2011, 2:33 AM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
Update on the Polywell:

As of 3Q/2011, the WB-8 device has generated over 500 high power plasma shots. EMC2 is conducting tests on Wiffle-Ball plasma scaling law on plasma heating and confinement.

http://www.recovery.gov/Transparency...9&PopId=212569
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Nov 7, 2011, 8:58 PM
scalziand's Avatar
scalziand scalziand is offline
Mortaaaaaaaaar!
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Naugatuck, CT/Worcester,MA
Posts: 3,506
E-cat on Bloomberg:
Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Engineering
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:42 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.