HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #661  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2016, 2:43 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Link Is Now Bigger Than All ST Express Routes Combined

Read More: http://seattletransitblog.com/2016/0...utes-combined/

Quote:
.....

The figures are as robust as you’d expect, with 79% year-over-year growth for Link Light Rail, clocking in at 60,000 weekday boardings versus 33,000 a year ago. ULink is also trending roughly 30% above Sound Transit’s target, with 200 passengers per trip compared to the April 2016 target of 150.

- Sounder continued its robust growth, with 600 passengers per trip and 5% year over year growth. Sounder carries 1/4 as many weekday riders as Link (15k vs 60k), a healthy figure for just a couple dozen daily trips. But April also crossed another interesting threshold, as Link now carries more total riders than all 28 Sound Transit Express routes combined. To be fair, this is largely due to Link’s very high weekend frequency relative to ST Express, and ST Express still carries slightly more weekday passengers (65k versus 60k), but likely not for long as ULink growth continues and Angle Lake opens in late summer/early fall.

.....



__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #662  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2016, 2:49 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
New light-rail plan emerges in Austin

Read More: http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/ne...in-austin.html

Quote:
The Central Austin Community Development Corp. wants to put a plan for a rail starter-line before voters this November.

- The CACDC released its vision Thursday, which would add a 5.3-mile light-rail line along Guadalupe Street and North Lamar Boulevard that would basically whisk travelers between downtown's Republic Square and Capital Metro’s Red Line Crestview Station in North Austin.

- According to the announcement, the project is estimated to cost $397.5 million — far less than the billion-plus-dollar proposal for 9.5 miles of urban rail shot down two years ago. If this bond proposal gains traction, it could compete with a road-focused $720 million bond proposal floated by Mayor Steve Adler.

.....



__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #663  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2016, 2:55 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Ontario commits $C 1bn to Ottawa urban rail expansion

Read More: http://www.railjournal.com/index.php...expansion.html

Quote:
THE premier of Ontario Mrs Kathleen Wynne announced on June 3 that the Canadian province will provide $C 1bn ($US 770m) towards Ottawa's $C 3bn Stage 2 LRT project, which will add 30km and 19 stations to the capital's urban rail network.

- Stage 2 LRT will more than double the length of the 12.5km east-west Confederation Line (also known as Stage 1 LRT), which is due to open in 2018. The 13km western extension from Tunney's Pasture to Bayshore with a branch to Baseline will include 10 stations, while to the east, a 10km extension from Blair to Place d'Orléans will add another four stations to the network.

- The third project included in Stage 2 is an 8km five-station southern extension of the diesel-operated Trillium Line from Greenboro to Bowesville in Riverside South. In addition to these extensions, Ontario's contribution will also support the development of a two-station branch off the Trillium Line to Ottawa Macdonald-Cartier International Airport and a further one-station extension of the Confederation Line from Place d'Orléans to Trim Road in Orléans. These two extensions would add a further 6.5km to the network.

.....



__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #664  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2016, 1:42 PM
initiald's Avatar
initiald initiald is offline
Oak City
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 4,946
Charlotte LYNX Blue Line Extention update:

The LYNX Blue Line extension is on schedule to open mid/late 2017. It will add 9.3-miles and 11 stations to the existing 9.6 mile line, ending on at UNC Charlotte campus.












Source
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #665  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2016, 6:18 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Las Vegas Eyes Light-Rail As it Seeks Airport Connection

Read More: http://urbanedge.blogs.rice.edu/2016...il-connection/

Quote:
.....

When people fly into the McCarran International Airport, many have to choose between waiting on a taxi or taking the bus to get to the casinos along the Strip — even though the Strip borders the airport itself.

- Last year, the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada released a 30-year plan that includes recommendations for a light-rail connection between the airport and the Strip. And proponents argue a new line could connect to the existing Monorail train that links several big name properties along the corridor.

- “We only need 5.5 miles of it because it’s a really close-in airport,” explained Robert Lang, executive director at Brookings Mountain West and a professor at the University of Nevada – Las Vegas. “The airport runway practically lands in the Strip.” --- “It’s a very urban space,” he said of the Strip, home to well-known casinos such as the Venetian, Caesars Palace and MGM Grand.

- The rail could run underground, at street level or on elevated structures. It could take several different routes around the airport. And funding still needs to be figured out. Cost estimates range from around $600 million to $5.7 billion and could be covered through a variety of local tax and revenue sources as well as federal funds and grants.

.....



__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #666  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2016, 6:43 PM
exit2lef exit2lef is offline
self-important urbanista
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,024
^I assume, then, that any ambitions of extending the LV Monorail to McCarran are now off the table?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #667  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2016, 8:36 PM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,523
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef View Post
^I assume, then, that any ambitions of extending the LV Monorail to McCarran are now off the table?
Were there ever serious plans to extend the monorail to McCarran? The monorail was privately funded, requiring hotels and casinos along its route to fund it.

Between the MGM Grand and McCarran; along the north side of the street is vacant land, along the south side of the street is McCarran airport, and the approaches to two major runways.

I don't believe McCarran would want an elevated monorail on its property on the runway approaches, and there's nobody willing to pay to extend the monorail on the north side of the street. Although I believe McCarran would allow the monorail access to its property east of the runway approaches heading to its main terminal.

So there is at least one missing funding partner to get the monorail guideway to McCarran. A light rail line running in dedicated lanes within the city's streets avoids accessing private lands obstacles, and more likely to be operated as a transit asset instead of an expensive carnival ride.

Whereas I would prefer to see the monorail extended to both downtown and McCarran, I understand why a privately ran monorail has failed to do so. the only way I foresee the monorail reaching McCarran is for the City to take its operations over and fully subsidize it, and lower the fares to make it a valuable public mass transit asset.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #668  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2016, 8:43 PM
exit2lef exit2lef is offline
self-important urbanista
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
Were there ever serious plans to extend the monorail to McCarran? The monorail was privately funded, requiring hotels and casinos along its route to fund it.

Between the MGM Grand and McCarran; along the north side of the street is vacant land, along the south side of the street is McCarran airport, and the approaches to two major runways.

I don't believe McCarran would want an elevated monorail on its property on the runway approaches, and there's nobody willing to pay to extend the monorail on the north side of the street. Although I believe McCarran would allow the monorail access to its property east of the runway approaches heading to its main terminal.

So there is at least one missing funding partner to get the monorail guideway to McCarran. A light rail line running in dedicated lanes within the city's streets avoids accessing private lands obstacles, and more likely to be operated as a transit asset instead of an expensive carnival ride.

Whereas I would prefer to see the monorail extended to both downtown and McCarran, I understand why a privately ran monorail has failed to do so. the only way I foresee the monorail reaching McCarran is for the City to take its operations over and fully subsidize it, and lower the fares to make it a valuable public mass transit asset.
In the monorail's early days, I remember hearing of an eventual prospect of extending it to the airport, but that was before it became apparent how unsuccessful the project was. For all the reasons you have stated, light rail is a better option. It's just a shame that wasn't pursued originally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #669  
Old Posted Jun 18, 2016, 4:53 AM
Easy's Avatar
Easy Easy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,576
Quote:
Originally Posted by initiald View Post
This is actually very decent. Fantastic for Charlotte. Nice headways, high speeds and if they can get that average ridership per mile it will be one of the busier light rail lines in the country.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #670  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2016, 2:49 PM
exit2lef exit2lef is offline
self-important urbanista
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,024
Update to the Phoenix City Council on light rail expansion plans. The light rail presentation runs about 17 minutes: https://youtu.be/aMtynOwfZ-c?t=58m40s
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #671  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2016, 4:47 PM
shivtim's Avatar
shivtim shivtim is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Midtown Atlanta
Posts: 2,359
Proposed S-line concept for Atlanta light rail. Would incorporate the existing streetcar infrastructure and be mostly in separated Beltline right-of-way. City Council will vote soon on what to include in a November tax referendum; this option is on the table.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #672  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2016, 6:19 AM
IMBY IMBY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef View Post
^I assume, then, that any ambitions of extending the LV Monorail to McCarran are now off the table?
If you factor in the mob-like taxi unions in Las Vegas, with some 9,000 jobs at stake, you'll better understand why the Monorail, a stones throw away from the Airport, was not extended to the Airport, years ago, or north to Fremont Street.

And now with Lyft & Uber holding hands with the taxi unions, any mass transit plans here will have to appease these entities as well.

There should have been a light rail line from the Airport to downtown Las Vegas 20 years ago, and why are they suddenly getting serious about a light rail plan for the Strip? They were waiting for a stickpin, as things in this city move at a tortoise pace!

Stickpin: Our biggest convention competitor is Orlando and they're building a Maglev train from their Airport to their convention center. That's one factor!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #673  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2016, 7:37 AM
Arthururban Arthururban is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 50
Light Rail connecting to LIC

http://ltvsquad.com/2015/10/22/disas...the-mall-plan/

Published on: October 22nd, 2015 | Last updated: October 29, 2015 Written by: Ray Cevoli

There have been some recent news stories about the NYC city council trying to plan some better transit options around NYC – one of those ideas is to revive passenger train service along the ‘Lower Montauk’ tracks through Queens.

The idea
City councilwoman Elizabeth Crowley is pushing for a light rail train that would connect a mall in Glendale to LIC.

I couldn’t find an actual map of her idea online (is it just me or is that a not a huge red flag?), so I drew one up myself. It contains a few other items that we’ll discuss below.

Q: What is the ‘Lower Montauk’? What is it’s history?
A: This route was once a vital part of LIRR service to long island. It runs from LIC to Jamaica station, where it meets up with the main line and Atlantic avenue branches.

There is an excellent video outlining this route’s history to be found on youtube – I highly recommend it.

Q: When did passenger train service end?
A: This route had rush-hour only passenger service that was discontinued in 1998.

Q: Why did the LIRR stop running passenger trains here?
A: Service was discontinued for 2 reasons: 1) At the time, ridership was only 1 or 2 passengers per stop. and 2) the federal government required the MTA to have ‘high level’ platforms that are handicap accessible (the ADA requirements). The cost of upgrading these stations was estimated at the time to be somewhere between $260,000 to $2.25 million per station. The cost for so few riders just plain didn’t make sense at the time. Though perhaps if the money was spent, more people would have know there were stations here?

Nearly all of the stops along this route were barely recognizable as stations. Most were dirt patches next to the tracks, maybe with a station sign on them. There were no ticket vending machines, much less a concrete pad to stand on. As one of the regular commuters from Glendale stated at the time: “You don’t realize how many people walk by and say, ‘There’s a station here?””

The train service here was also very limited – to rush hour only trains and only in one direction (towards LIC in the morning, and the reverse towards Long Island in the evening).

The lack of station infrastructure combined with extremely limited service handicapped this route from being useful to most commuters. There was also a reported fear back in the 1970s against having rapid transit on this route. Indeed, one concept for the 63rd street tunnel was to run the F train down along these tracks. I’ve heard rumors that there were actual protests against this plan by those living near the tracks, lead by Geraldine Ferraro. (see the comment by Larry Littlefield for here reference – this was before my time, so I’ll have to research it more – by all means comment below if you were around back then and can add to this).

(...)

Let’s back up though and look at Crowley’s actual plan:
“Crowley proposes that the line would start at The Shops at Atlas Park, where there are 1,300 parking spaces available, with stops heading west, terminating at the Hunterspoint Avenue LIRR stop, which has a train depot to store and turn trains around.”

Let’s go to the maps again:

She is proposing to run trains only from Atlas Park to… Hunterspoint Ave? Is Crowley really proposing that trains run down to LIC yard, then back up to Hunterspoint Avenue? What would the point of that be? Does she know that there is no other physical connection to route trains on the Lower Montauk tracks to Hunterspoint Avenue?

Just look at the map and the photo above of the Montauk Cutoff – the only way to get a train from Glendale to Hunterspoint Avenue station is to go into the yard at LIC and reverse back to Hunterspoint. This isn’t just a misprint – other publications have stated Hunterspoint would be the end station at end of the line in LIC – NOT the existing LIRR LIC station located next to Borden avenue.

How can anyone take her idea seriously if she doesn’t know this?

The Mall Terminal: Cronyism at its worst
Also – why terminate the route at a mall? It doesn’t service the potential ridership from Jamaica and the old Richmond Hill station at all. This is literally building a rail line to nowhere.

Of course, there is a good reason in Crowley’s mind to go to the mall: Half of the Atlas property is owned by Gina Argento-Ciafone, who is a Crowley-Crony. This is NYC politics afterall – where some real estate developer or another is always looking to the government for schemes to increase the value of their holdings.

The mall half of Atlas Park is owned by Macerich, a huge company that owns many malls across the USA. I’m sure they’d love to cash in on the 1300 parking spots they have available for rent. $200 a month parking passes would be a quarter of a million dollars in revenue every month. Or maybe Gina would build one huge parking lot and get the cash instead?

Thus, the only reason for terminating this proposed light rail line at Atlas Park is money for cronyism.

Sadly, it doesn’t just end there:

Crowley doesn’t know who currently dispatches these tracks
Just read this gem of a quote: “Crowley responded by saying that companies are looking to increase the amount of freight, and if the community does not recognize this track as a benefit then it might be taken over for freight transportation.”

Again, Crowley doesn’t know what is happening along these tracks. The LIRR has given full operational control over these tracks to the freight railway. (For there part, the freight operator, New York & Atlantic railway – has publicly stated that all of this is an issue for the MTA to sort out, under the expectation that the federally protected interstate commerce inherit in rail freight operates will not be infringed upon).

But wait, it gets even worse: (Read more....)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #674  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2016, 1:05 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,356
^

__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #675  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2016, 4:47 AM
Arthururban Arthururban is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 50
hahaha thanks. There's another pic in the article above but for some reason posting photos doesn't work for me. I can post on another forum but not in here for some reason?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #676  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2016, 5:23 PM
eleven=11 eleven=11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,053
new light rail planing for downtown miami to connect
to soon under construction miami beach system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #677  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2016, 3:46 PM
tdawg's Avatar
tdawg tdawg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Astoria, NY
Posts: 2,937
I love the S line concept in Atlanta, especially that it would involve the creation of two infill stations.
__________________
From my head via my fingers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #678  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2016, 7:09 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
What The Paris Trams Can Teach U.S. Cities

Read More: http://transitcenter.org/2016/07/07/...re-hyper-cool/

Quote:
.....

The Paris tramways have proven exceptional not just because there are so many of them, but also because they are so popular. Ridership is 900,000 per day, which is five times greater than America’s busiest light-rail system (Boston’s Green Line) and greater than any subway system in the U.S. except New York.

- It takes just a few seconds looking at the RATP map to see why the Paris trams are so useful. In Paris’s hub-and-spoke transit network, they are the rim of the wheel, connecting the ends of Metro and RER lines in far-flung parts of the region. All nine lines offer at least two stations that connect to other modes of transit. In most instances, the streets and stations are designed to make the connection as smooth as possible. Even commuter rail stations don’t present an obstacle to tram transfers.

- The ability of the trams to link existing transit is not a happy coincidence, but rather an explicit goal of the network’s planners. According to Sandrine Gourlet, a STIF deputy director who spoke to Le Figaro about the trams back in 2012, the agency calculated that forcing customers to make transfers that take longer than two minutes produces a ridership drop of 10 percent.

- The Paris trams haven’t just brought about street redesigns around the station areas. Rather than trying to jam the lines into existing traffic patterns and streetscapes (as U.S. streetcar lines tend to do), the trams run overwhelmingly in rights of way constructed to be completely clear of motor vehicle traffic and almost always accompanied by improvements to the pedestrian environment, traffic calming measures, and other infrastructure.

- During the vast majority of the week, however, tram riders in the Paris region wait less time for a tram than many subway riders do in the United States. The RATP maintains a level of service for the tram system that is very high by global standards (and remember, this is a system that is ancillary to the Metro and the RER regional rail lines). --- Even in August on an early Sunday morning, there is no line in the system where a rider must wait more than 20 minutes.

.....
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #679  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2016, 1:07 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Miami Beach fast-tracks light rail project

Read More: http://www.railjournal.com/index.php...l-project.html

Quote:
MIAMI Beach City Commission has given the go-ahead to negotiate an interim agreement with the Alstom-led Greater Miami Transit Partners consortium, which has submitted the highest-ranking proposal for a light rail line in the city.

The city will now negotiate a long-term PPP contract with the consortium to design, build, finance, operate and maintain the line. If the city cannot reach an agreement with the consortium it could open talks with the second and third-placed bidders, Connect Miami Beach and Miami Beach Mobility Partners. Preliminary recommendations call for the construction of a loop serving South Beach, which would be built in two phases, each around 4km long.

The first phase would run along 5th Street and Washington Avenue, while the second phase would continue the line along Alton Road and 17th Street. An additional loop along Dade Boulevard is also being evaluated. The double-track line will run in dedicated transit lanes for its entire length and will be completely catenary free, with Alstom's ground-based APS technology being put forward for the electrification system.

.....



__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #680  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2016, 5:53 PM
llamaorama llamaorama is online now
Unicorn Wizard!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,210
Why bother extending the Atlanta Streetcar that way?

Why not go the other way. From the western terminus of the line, you'd stop a bit closer to the convention center, Coke plaza, go north up through the Georgia Tech campus, Atlantic Station, Peachtree @ the Amtrak Depot, etc, to MARTA?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:30 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.