HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction


Two World Trade Center in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4361  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2016, 9:06 PM
Enigmatism415's Avatar
Enigmatism415 Enigmatism415 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by TK2001 View Post
a PATH Station will open on the north side.
It was supposed to open literally over a year ago. Why won't anyone say when it will open for real? There's no sense of urgency to make it usable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4362  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2016, 12:50 AM
TK2001's Avatar
TK2001 TK2001 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Not your business
Posts: 2,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigmatism415 View Post
It was supposed to open literally over a year ago. Why won't anyone say when it will open for real? There's no sense of urgency to make it usable.
It was even supposed to open on the May 26th opening, but nope!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4363  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2016, 5:30 PM
Enigmatism415's Avatar
Enigmatism415 Enigmatism415 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by TK2001 View Post
It was even supposed to open on the May 26th opening, but nope!
Apparently it will open either next week or in two weeks, so basically by July.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4364  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2016, 4:18 AM
jayden jayden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: JERSEY
Posts: 1,490
Anyone have any idea of why Libeskind didn't want to switch the transit hub and 2WTC? I feel like it would have made the final product look more balanced or in uniformity, as opposed to 2WTC being directly behind 1WTC from Jersey and directly in front from Brooklyn. I'm assuming he wanted the hub to be enclosed so that there was no question that it was part of the WTC complex?

It's basically irrelevant now, but I figured I would ask.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4365  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2016, 5:29 AM
Enigmatism415's Avatar
Enigmatism415 Enigmatism415 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayden View Post
Anyone have any idea of why Libeskind didn't want to switch the transit hub and 2WTC? I feel like it would have made the final product look more balanced or in uniformity, as opposed to 2WTC being directly behind 1WTC from Jersey and directly in front from Brooklyn. I'm assuming he wanted the hub to be enclosed so that there was no question that it was part of the WTC complex?

It's basically irrelevant now, but I figured I would ask.
Fortunately, there is a simple answer: the plan all along was to align the transit hub with Dey Street, since it was known before the final site plan that the Fulton Center would be built and desire a direct connection to the WTC. In addition to that, switching the two plots would have drastically set 1WTC apart from the rest of the compelx, thus making it seem as though the other three (or four) buildings were not really a part of the WTC.

Last edited by Enigmatism415; Jun 16, 2016 at 6:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4366  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2016, 4:12 PM
drumz0rz drumz0rz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 623
I'm not sure what the hold up has been to open up the PATH entrance on Vesey. The lobby was built out over a year ago and the Oculus is now mostly open.

I believe the plan is that once they open that entrance they will close the Temporary entrance next to 1 WTC allowing them to Demo that entrance, complete interior build out of the PATH hall, and eventually build a planned but forgotten performing arts center there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4367  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2016, 6:04 PM
Enigmatism415's Avatar
Enigmatism415 Enigmatism415 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumz0rz View Post
I'm not sure what the hold up has been to open up the PATH entrance on Vesey. The lobby was built out over a year ago and the Oculus is now mostly open.

I believe the plan is that once they open that entrance they will close the Temporary entrance next to 1 WTC allowing them to Demo that entrance, complete interior build out of the PATH hall, and eventually build a planned but forgotten performing arts center there.
I'd be surprised if they were to close the temporary entrance before opening the West Concourse.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4368  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2016, 10:03 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,795
Potential tenant possibly. Hopefully they will consider this tower.

==================



Ernst & Young eyes New Jersey waterfront office space, may shrink Times Square presence

Quote:
EY, formerly known as Ernst & Young, plans to vacate a portion of its longtime Times Square home and shift some of its operations to New Jersey.

The accounting firm is negotiating to relocate as much as 170,000 square feet at 5 Times Square to the New Jersey waterfront, according to several sources familiar with the London-based company's search. Those sources said the firm is in talks to take space at 121 River St., an office building in Hoboken.

The deal in New Jersey would be EY's first step in a potentially bigger move to shift a large segment of its space out of its New York City headquarters at 5 Times Square, where it occupies nearly 1 million square feet, according to CoStar Group Inc. Beginning next year, the firm plans to start searching for space in lower Manhattan, where it is exploring locations for roughly half of its offices, sources said. It will likely keep some space at 5 Times Square or a new location in midtown.

EY acknowledged in a statement that it is searching for new offices but would not delve into the specifics of where or when it would move.

"EY continues to grow and expand our capabilities in serving our clients," a spokesman for the company wrote in the statement. "We are evaluating a host of locations, all aligned with our strategic plan to deliver service across the greater New York City marketplaces, including New Jersey and Connecticut."
======================
http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article...alert-20160616
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4369  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2016, 10:41 PM
jayden jayden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: JERSEY
Posts: 1,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigmatism415 View Post
Fortunately, there is a simple answer: the plan all along was to align the transit hub with Dey Street, since it was known before the final site plan that the Fulton Center would be built and desire a direct connection to the WTC. In addition to that, switching the two plots would have drastically set 1WTC apart from the rest of the compelx, thus making it seem as though the other three (or four) buildings were not really a part of the WTC.
Thanks for the explanation!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4370  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2016, 3:01 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,869
One thing that will remain constant at 2 WTC regardless of design is the access/exit point fot the PATH terminal. It's an important piece of the puzzle that had to be built to get the station open.



This is an earlier rendering of the entry in Foster's design:






Temporary opening...(JUNE 30, 2016)






__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4371  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2016, 4:13 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,869
http://therealdeal.com/2016/07/18/na...nding-drought/

Navigating the construction lending drought
Trophy office buildings and luxury condos are becoming harder to finance, but some are tapping into the right formulas






July 18, 2016
By Kathryn Brenzel


Quote:
In November 2014, after more than a decade of political disarray and public disappointment, the first World Trade Center tower finally opened, giving New Yorkers a sense that the sprawling commercial complex was becoming a reality once and for all. Things came more into focus this year, when the transit hub opened in March, followed by the topping out of 3 World Trade Center in late June.

And yet, a crucial piece of the development project — 2 World Trade Center— is still missing.

Just six months ago, Silverstein Properties was seeking to close on $2 billion in debt to construct the 2.8-million-square-foot, 1,270-foot-tall tower designed by Bjarke Ingels, when the developer was struck by a deal-killing blow: Its anchor-tenants-to-be, Rupert Murdoch’s 21st Century Fox and News Corp., announced in a joint letter that they were pulling out of their agreement to lease 1.3 million square feet on the lower levels of the building.

“We won’t start that building without some level of preleasing,” the firm’s CEO, Marty Burger, told The Real Deal. “We need either an anchor tenant or enough tenants to get to the preleasing level that will make lenders comfortable.”

It’s an improbable set of circumstances: One of the city’s most notable developers can’t get one of the city’s most well-known commercial office projects off the ground.

As lenders become all the more sensitive to which deals make sense on their books, both commercial and residential developers have become entangled in a game of survival of the fittest. The majority of banks and other financial firms have become increasingly selective about the kinds of projects they are willing to finance.

Because of that, the ability to successfully build a new condo or office tower typically depends on a confluence of circumstances involving generous amounts of equity and well-established reputations on the part of developers. In the case of office construction, there’s a rough formula for securing financing — one that includes a high demand for space, street-level retail and a hefty helping of recourse, which provides the lender with collateral in the event of nonpayment.

But even some of the most seasoned developers in the city are struggling to get the financing they need to complete these projects, especially when some banks are capping their exposure at $50 million.

Though Silverstein’s executives remain adamant that they will find a replacement tenant soon, the company’s predicament encapsulates the many challenges of building new large-scale office buildings in the city. In order to get the necessary construction financing for such projects, the sponsors behind them often need to show that up to 50 percent of the project’s rentable space is preleased, according to industry sources. Yet, on the whole, the appetite to finance new trophy office buildings is waning, with lenders more eager to fund the redevelopment of existing buildings. Gregg Gerken, head of the U.S. commercial lending group at TD Bank, said that very little spec office development is being done in New York right now and that developers are curbing risk for lenders by having their projects 35 to 50 percent preleased before beginning construction.

Silverstein’s Burger declined to specify what level of preleasing 2 World Trade Center would require before the company can continue building. Its previous anchor tenants, Fox and News Corp., had pledged to take nearly half the 2.8 million square feet of space.

Well-positioned rivals

As a case study of what kind of projects have been able to secure construction financing, WTC’s competition to the north, Hudson Yards, has managed to find tenants for its project 30 Hudson Yards. Related Companies TRData LogoTINY and Oxford Properties Group in December secured $5 billion in construction financing from a group of banks and EB-5 investors well after the developers had an anchor tenant lined up for the building. The office building’s tenants include Wells Fargo, Nieman Marcus and Time Warner, the latter of which is taking 1.3 million square feet of the total 2.6 million square feet. When asked why Hudson Yards might have an advantage over 2 WTC, Gerken noted that including ground-floor retail is attractive to tenants and also to lenders, since owners can often charge tenants more for it than office. The project also benefits from a planned 960,000-square-foot residential tower, 15 Hudson Yards.

One exception to the preleasing rule is SL Green Realty Corp.’s proposed skyscraper One Vanderbilt on the corner of 42nd Street and Vanderbilt Avenue. The 1.6 million-square-foot office tower is expected to cost just north of $3 billion, and SL Green has said that it’s close to closing on a $1.5 billion construction loan before the end of the summer.

The company also plans to team up with a joint-venture partner, who will cover 50 percent of the required equity. The only announced tenant so far is TD Bank, which is taking 200,000 square feet in the building — or less than 13 percent of the available space. SL Green’s reputation is a help in its quest for financing: The REIT currently holds interest in 121 Manhattan buildings across 47.7 million square feet.

In addition to the company’s extensive portfolio, the tower’s proposed location gives it an edge. It’s a new office building in Midtown directly next to Grand Central Terminal, a quality that few buildings can boast. The building has been billed as a game changer for Midtown East, the first of more development to breathe life back into what was once a more vibrant commercial corridor. In May 2015, the City Council approved the first phase of a planned 73-block rezoning that will allow for taller buildings in the area. In exchange, developers are expected to improve public space and infrastructure. In 2014, SL Green unveiled plans for $210 million worth of improvements to Grand Central Terminal.

“To have a humongous new office building in Midtown is extremely rare,” said Mark Edelstein, chair of the real estate finance and distressed real estate practices at Morrison & Foerster. “I think that’s a building that will get built regardless and the tenants will come along the way.”
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4372  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 2:00 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,869
http://www.wsj.com/articles/blackroc...unt-1469643587

BlackRock Fills Wall Street Void in Headquarters Hunt
Asset manager has narrowed search for new headquarters down to three sites in Manhattan



By Sarah Krouse
July 27, 2016


Quote:
BlackRock Inc. is presenting New York real-estate developers with something they haven’t seen in a while—a financial firm that is looking to grow.

While big banks and hedge funds are in retreat and emptying out space, the asset management giant is deciding whether to move into a new global headquarters and is narrowing its review of sites being developed in Manhattan down to three.

The 850,000-square-foot deal will be among the biggest leases of the year for the city and a contrast to the direction of the banking industry.

....BlackRock’s search has become the focal point for brokers looking to lock in one of the highest profile tenants now examining space. The firm is considering sites at the Hudson Yards development on the far West Side, neighboring Manhattan West and the World Trade Center development in lower Manhattan, according to people familiar with the matter, in addition to remaining in its current space.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4373  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 11:30 PM
DCReid DCReid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
http://www.wsj.com/articles/blackroc...unt-1469643587

BlackRock Fills Wall Street Void in Headquarters Hunt
Asset manager has narrowed search for new headquarters down to three sites in Manhattan



By Sarah Krouse
July 27, 2016
Unfornately this building is not being considered according to another article - they are considering: The Durst Organization’s One World Trade Center, the Related Companies and Oxford Properties Group’s Hudson Yards and Brookfield Property Partners’ Manhattan West. Per -
http://therealdeal.com/2016/07/27/bl...ree-locations/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4374  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2016, 4:48 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCReid View Post
Unfornately this building is not being considered according to another article - they are considering: The Durst Organization’s One World Trade Center, the Related Companies and Oxford Properties Group’s Hudson Yards and Brookfield Property Partners’ Manhattan West. Per -
http://therealdeal.com/2016/07/27/bl...ree-locations/
That article used the same one I did as a source.

In either case, it doesn't matter. The city isn't short on potential tenants...



http://therealdeal.com/2016/08/03/es...ew-foundation/

Estée Lauder looking for new foundation
Cosmetics firm could consolidate offices at GM Building, 110 East 59th into new location as large as 500K sf



August 03, 2016
By Rich Bockmann


Quote:
Cosmetics giant Estée Lauder is considering a move from its perch at the General Motors Building, and is in the market for a new headquarters as large as 500,000 square feet, sources told The Real Deal.

The 70-year-old company is scouting locations for new home that could see it consolidate the nearly 300,000 square feet it has at the GM Building, as well as roughly 150,000 square feet nearby at Jack Resnick & Sons’ 110 East 59th Street. Estée’s leases in those buildings expire in 2020 and 2018, respectively, according to CoStar.

Early last year, the company signed a 100,000-square-foot lease in Midtown South for its Aramis and Designer Fragrance division and digital/social media workers at 28-40 West 23rd Street, bringing its total there to 166,000 square feet. Those offices would stay put if the company does decide to relocate one or both of its Midtown offices, sources told TRD.

In December, the Commercial Observer reported that Estée had brought on CBRE to help explore the possibility of relocating from its longtime home at the GM Building. CBRE’s Stephen Siegel is now bringing the tenant to market, sources said, though the search is still in the early stages and has not yet zeroed in on particular buildings.

Siegel declined to comment. Any search is likely to swing through new buildings on the Far West Side and Downtown, where rents are significantly lower compared to the GM Building, located at 767 Fifth Avenue.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4375  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2016, 4:57 PM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
I see where you're going with this lease opportunity NYguy, but there are no indications that 2 WTC is in consideration, is there?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4376  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2016, 5:08 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechTalkGuy View Post
I see where you're going with this lease opportunity NYguy, but there are no indications that 2 WTC is in consideration, is there?

No, only other than the fact it would be the only new office tower (without a signature tenant taking the lower floors) Downtown, where the rents are cheaper.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4377  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2016, 5:15 PM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
No, only other than the fact it would be the only new office tower (without a signature tenant taking the lower floors) Downtown, where the rents are cheaper.
The same could be said for One Vanderbilt (and it's much closer) and 15 Penn Plaza, but I agree that 2 WTC would be a better alternative.

Either way, they have decisions to make.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4378  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2016, 5:24 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechTalkGuy View Post
The same could be said for One Vanderbilt (and it's much closer) and 15 Penn Plaza, but I agree that 2 WTC would be a better alternative.

Either way, they have decisions to make.

Not really. One Vanderbilt has an anchor tenant, which will already occupy the cheaper lower floors. And its on the eastside. 15 Penn is too far off (with closing and demolition needed). Manhattan West could be an option, as its on the westside. But any serious search for cheaper new office space Downtown would most likely be at 2 WTC.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4379  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2016, 11:42 PM
TK2001's Avatar
TK2001 TK2001 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Not your business
Posts: 2,468
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4380  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2016, 2:06 AM
TechTalkGuy's Avatar
TechTalkGuy TechTalkGuy is offline
Mr. Technology
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,008
It looks like the first 13 lower floors are leased.
Floors 28-41 and floor 59 are leased.

Still a long way to go!

What's above the 90th floor?
Is it going to be a restaurant like Windows on the World?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Supertall Construction
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:39 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.