Quote:
Originally Posted by JManc
I don't think that will ever happen.
|
yeah that's doubtful.
but at the same time, if someone feels like including poles in the height figures of buildings, there is no law that one must be a slave to the CTBUH's rules.
if someone wanna says that chicago has a 1,700 footer (sears) and a 1,500 footer (hancock), by pinnacle height, book-ending its skyline, then that's a perfectly cromulent statement.