I think the problem with the way people see culture is they see it as homogeneous. But that is not true at all.
Cultures interact with other, borrow from each other, share things with each other, overlap with each other. Cultures are not discrete entities that developed in isolation from one another. And cultures are still developing, and constantly evolving.
Even defining a particular culture or nation, that is difficult. Everyone will have their own definition.
Cultures therefore are inherently multicultural to begin with. I think Canada did not delude itself into thinking that it could be a homogeneous nation, and was forced to confront this fact in large part due to Quebec, although ironically it is Quebec that has most obnoxious and discriminatory nationalist policies in Canada.
Nations are merely ideals, especially the idea of nation-state, where the boundaries of state and nation are one and the same. Unless the state completely isolates itself from the rest of the world, I don't see how it could be a nation. How more people are going to get killed and persecute for this goal of a nation-state? Let's not forget, genocide has happened in Canada too...
What the article describes about Toronto is a good example of the two-way relationship between immigrants and their "host" culture: immigrants borrow from Toronto's culture, and Toronto itself borrows from their cultures. I think this is an important lesson.
If you want new immigrants to be more "Canadian", then you also have to allow immigrants to contribute to Canadian culture and help shape and define Canadian culture, just like immigrants from Europe did decades and centuries ago. As I said, no cultures are static, cultures are always evolving. To expect culture to stay the same doesn't make sense.
So I think what the author is describing about Toronto is not unique to Toronto. But then again, the author never said it is either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sopas ej
Hahaha! This Francine Prose woman has never been to Los Ángeles, perhaps. Maybe NYC isn't the "ethnic buffet" she wishes it was, but I think Los Ángeles could give Toronto a run for its money.
LA's public transit website; notice the other languages listed near the top:
metro.net
I was very surprised to see Toronto's transit website to be all in English, I was expecting it to at least be bilingual English/French.
|
I'm not sure how the non-English languages options on LA's public transit website provides evidence about the level of integration and quality of food in LA. Perhaps you can explain it to us.