Federal Government & Politics II

[Truenorth00]

Originally Posted by MonctonRad

We have irrefutable evidence that JT is wreaking absolute carnage on the Canadian economy, and causing untold despair upon the nation's youth, most of whom have now lost hope of ever owning a home or starting a family, and, JTs solution to all this is to artificially inflate the economy by importing millions of immigrants from the third world, and to wrecklessly spend billions of dollars on questionable new federal government programs which will put us all into penury within 10-15 years because of crippling debt servicing payments.

I wouldn't say the economy is absolutely terrible. It's still a lot better today than say the early 90s recession when my family first got to Canada. There were major layoffs announced in the newspaper weekly back then. What we have right now is growing inequality and economic stagnation for some with a really comfortable life for the rest. You're a tad upset by recent changes made to the tax code. It might cost you an extra year or two of work. Imagine how young people in major cities feel where saving for a downpayment will take 20-25 years. And during that time you have no certainty on housing. Your landlord can renovict you anytime. Bad as you have it, young people have it worse. And it's been that way for a very long time.

A lot of the problems we face here are somewhat common across the Western world. They come with an aging population and lower economic growth in general. Ironically, Trudeau has made this worse specifically because he made a choice to prioritized the interests of the wrinkled over the young and in doing so basically can kicked for a decade, only making it worse. The next government is going to have their work cut out for them. Are they willing to make the hard choices necessary?

[YOWetal]

Originally Posted by Truenorth00

I wouldn't say the economy is absolutely terrible. It's still a lot better today than say the early 90s recession when my family first got to Canada. There were major layoffs announced in the newspaper weekly back then. What we have right now is growing inequality and economic stagnation for some with a really comfortable life for the rest. You're a tad upset by recent changes made to the tax code. It might cost you an extra year or two of work. Imagine how young people in major cities feel where saving for a downpayment will take 20-25 years. And during that time you have no certainty on housing. Your landlord can renovict you anytime. Bad as you have it, young people have it worse. And it's been that way for a very long time.

A lot of the problems we face here are somewhat common across the Western world. They come with an aging population and lower economic growth in general. Ironically, Trudeau has made this worse specifically because he made a choice to prioritized the interests of the wrinkled over the young and in doing so basically can kicked for a decade, only making it worse. The next government is going to have their work cut out for them. Are they willing to make the hard choices necessary?

I think you are exactly right to put things in perspective. The economy is really in pretty good shape. Real incomes are down because inflation has outpaced incomes but we had a worldwide pandemic and avoided any widspread poverty and desperation by firehosing money. Of course the bills are coming due. Trudeau doesn't get a pass for a lot of redistribution over wealth generation decisions and purposely destroying some of our resource sector but the absolute vitriol that is spewed seems very excessive.

I don't think it is clear what the tough choices are that need to be made. We can cancel the huge increase in benefits Canadians get and lower taxes leading to increased growth but a lot more people will struggle and a recession could easily be the result.

[casper]

Originally Posted by Marshsparrow

What is the Conservative Party on?

Carney must testify because why?

Statement seems to miss the point that Chretien and Martin Liberals were better than any CONservative government as far as finances are concerned.

Mark being the PM leader would be a nightmare for Pierre - he knows it... MUST TESTIFY - what a joke.

https://www.conservative.ca/mark-car...nce-committee/

The Conservatives have difficulty with how our democratic values should work.

Mark Carney is a private citizen, he is free to have his views and to share them with whoever.

Will they invite Mark Carney as private citizen. Mark Carney as former UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance. Maybe they want him to speak as chair of the board of directors at Blomberg. Perhaps as chair of Brookfield Asset Management to talk about ethical and clean investments. Sounds like he is also involved on some boards at the Wold Economic Forum. Perhaps to provide a historical respective as former chair of the Bank of Canada or Bank of England.

No they want to get clarity on his position in running for a position he has not indicated a desire to run for, at a Liberal leadership convention that has not been called, to replace a leader that has not resigned.

I think it would be good if he did testify and was given a platform to school the Conservatives MPs on social responsibility and gust transition to a green economy.

[acottawa]

Originally Posted by Truenorth00

I wouldn't say the economy is absolutely terrible. It's still a lot better today than say the early 90s recession when my family first got to Canada. There were major layoffs announced in the newspaper weekly back then. What we have right now is growing inequality and economic stagnation for some with a really comfortable life for the rest. You're a tad upset by recent changes made to the tax code. It might cost you an extra year or two of work. Imagine how young people in major cities feel where saving for a downpayment will take 20-25 years. And during that time you have no certainty on housing. Your landlord can renovict you anytime. Bad as you have it, young people have it worse. And it's been that way for a very long time.

A lot of the problems we face here are somewhat common across the Western world. They come with an aging population and lower economic growth in general. Ironically, Trudeau has made this worse specifically because he made a choice to prioritized the interests of the wrinkled over the young and in doing so basically can kicked for a decade, only making it worse. The next government is going to have their work cut out for them. Are they willing to make the hard choices necessary?

You aren’t getting the layoff headlines of the 90s, but I think things are worse now. In the 90s there was still a large manufacturing and R&D sector. Productivity was rising, housing was getting more affordable each year as the decade wore on. Now we only have a real estate inflation sector. Productivity has fallen off a cliff, GDP per capita is falling. Any new jobs being created are being done with massive subsidies.

Pain was also more evenly shared back then. Factory workers had a tough decade, but so did bureaucrats. Now, not so much.

[acottawa]

Originally Posted by casper

The Conservatives have difficulty with how our democratic values should work.

Mark Carney is a private citizen, he is free to have his views and to share them with whoever.

Will they invite Mark Carney as private citizen. Mark Carney as former UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance. Maybe they want him to speak as chair of the board of directors at Blomberg. Perhaps as chair of Brookfield Asset Management to talk about ethical and clean investments. Sounds like he is also involved on some boards at the Wold Economic Forum. Perhaps to provide a historical respective as former chair of the Bank of Canada or Bank of England.

No they want to get clarity on his position in running for a position he has not indicated a desire to run for, at a Liberal leadership convention that has not been called, to replace a leader that has not resigned.

I think it would be good if he did testify and was given a platform to school the Conservatives MPs on social responsibility and gust transition to a green economy.

They want him to say how stupid the Trudeau economic policies are or get him on record supporting them in case he ever runs for the leadership. Pretty straightforward political gimmick that also forces Singh to dutifully do his boss’s bidding and vote against the subpoena.

[Dartguard]

Originally Posted by casper

The Conservatives have difficulty with how our democratic values should work.

Mark Carney is a private citizen, he is free to have his views and to share them with whoever.

Will they invite Mark Carney as private citizen. Mark Carney as former UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance. Maybe they want him to speak as chair of the board of directors at Blomberg. Perhaps as chair of Brookfield Asset Management to talk about ethical and clean investments. Sounds like he is also involved on some boards at the Wold Economic Forum. Perhaps to provide a historical respective as former chair of the Bank of Canada or Bank of England.

No they want to get clarity on his position in running for a position he has not indicated a desire to run for, at a Liberal leadership convention that has not been called, to replace a leader that has not resigned.

I think it would be good if he did testify and was given a platform to school the Conservatives MPs on social responsibility and gust transition to a green economy.

Yet Carneys remarks at the Canada 20/20 Conference last week directly repudiated our present P.M.'s budget and economic outlook. Carney asked where the growth strategy is for the Nation. Carney I think is very much a Blue Liberal . A rare species within the NDP/Liberal coalition government.
The main collapse of Trudeau's support is being led by Blue Liberals as they know how the Country should work as they have in the past created that balance between Economic growth and social responsibility. Talent like Carney are very concerned for our Future as difficult and painful decisions are coming. It time for this Student activists Government to resign and go to a Campus somewhere and protest Gaza or some other Capitalist conspiracy.
Its time for some Adult supervision.

Another Blue Liberal John Manley has recently been quoted as saying that modern Canadian governments get 9-10 years and that's it. Mulroney 9 years, Chretien 10 years, Harper 9 Years and now Justin Trudeau in his 9th year. Katy should have the Talk.

[casper]

Originally Posted by Dartguard

Yet Carneys remarks at the Canada 20/20 Conference last week directly repudiated our present P.M.'s budget and economic outlook. Carney asked where the growth strategy is for the Nation. Carney I think is very much a Blue Liberal . A rare species within the NDP/Liberal coalition government.
The main collapse of Trudeau's support is being led by Blue Liberals as they know how the Country should work as they have in the past created that balance between Economic growth and social responsibility. Talent like Carney are very concerned for our Future as difficult and painful decisions are coming. It time for this Student activists Government to resign and go to a Campus somewhere and protest Gaza or some other Capitalist conspiracy.
Its time for some Adult supervision.

Another Blue Liberal John Manley has recently been quoted as saying that modern Canadian governments get 9-10 years and that's it. Mulroney 9 years, Chretien 10 years, Harper 9 Years and now Justin Trudeau in his 9th year. Katy should have the Talk.

I fully support the idea that JT needs to resign before the next election and someone like Carney steps in. It is the only chance the liberals have in the next election. I just think we are running out of time. I also think in the 2025 budget were a Carney budget the NDP would vote against it. Carney is both fiscally and environmentally responsible, he would be ideal.

I find it odd that the conservatives are stepping into what is an internal Liberal leadership race that has not been started yet. Using a government committee to hold someone who is not in political office and not running in any election to account for his political views just leaves a bad taste.

[acottawa]

Originally Posted by casper

I find it odd that the conservatives are stepping into what is an internal Liberal leadership race that has not been started yet. Using a government committee to hold someone who is not in political office and not running in any election to account for his political views just leaves a bad taste.

They don’t need to ask about political views. He is fairly well established as an economic expert, they just have to ask his economic analysis of the Freeland budget.