HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2013, 10:07 PM
dmuzika dmuzika is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 423
Does High River Need a Floodway?

In looking at the devastation of High River, where the entire town had to be evacuated and a yet-to-be determined amount of homes and businesses will be condemned, I was thinking about the possibility of a floodway.

Should or could a Winnipeg-style floodway be constructed around High River so that the Highwood could bypass the town? This year was exceptional in terms of the magnitude of the flood, however High River is no stranger to flooding. The terrain immediately around High River seems comparatively flat.

Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2013, 10:35 PM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,921
It's called High River for a reason, which the current residents were painfully reminded of. That being said, maybe something will be done.

What do you mean by a floodway? Like a dyke system?
__________________
"you're eating chicken periods" - Vid
"I love eggs, especially the ones with runny yolks" - Me
"EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW, you're disgusting!" - Vid
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2013, 10:52 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmuzika View Post
Should or could a Winnipeg-style floodway be constructed around High River so that the Highwood could bypass the town?
Wow. Build a town by a river, and then spend money to divert the river around the town.

I have no further comment on your suggest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2013, 11:46 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 24,072
I think this is a must, we can't have the damn place flood every couple years and do nothing. What a stupid place to build a town!
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 8:44 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,047
Or a dam on the Highwood. The additional storage could support increased population and irrigation.

That alone may not be enough. High River already has a dike system but given the magnitude of water that rushed through during flash floods, maybe a floodway would also help. I suspect expropriating land for a floodway would be very expensive given the amount of exurban development around there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2013, 11:01 PM
dmuzika dmuzika is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Mind View Post
It's called High River for a reason, which the current residents were painfully reminded of. That being said, maybe something will be done.

What do you mean by a floodway? Like a dyke system?
I was thinking more of a canal that could serve as a bypass the town - similar to some of the irrigations canals that are in southern Alberta. The only difference is that it could either rejoin the Highwood River east of High River or flow directly into the Bow (the Highwood is a tributary of the Bow).

Quote:
Originally Posted by suburbia View Post
Wow. Build a town by a river, and then spend money to divert the river around the town.

I have no further comment on your suggest.
We don't have the ability to go back into time and build the town somewhere else - it is where it is. Are you saying the town should be leveled and reconstructed on higher ground?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug View Post
Or a dam on the Highwood. The additional storage could support increased population and irrigation.

That alone may not be enough. High River already has a dike system but given the magnitude of water that rushed through during flash floods, maybe a floodway would also help. I suspect expropriating land for a floodway would be very expensive given the amount of exurban development around there.
Granted a dam wouldn't have helped High River this time, but it might for lesser floods. I've read that Calgary used to flood a lot more along the Bow until the Ghost and Bearspaw dams were build. As for expropriation, this would be the time to do it as most of the development is either destroyed or compromised.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2013, 6:37 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
I think we should be looking at more of a small-scale diversion very much like the one in Portage la Prairie which has saved that city on numerous occasions
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2013, 1:15 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
I think we should be looking at more of a small-scale diversion very much like the one in Portage la Prairie which has saved that city on numerous occasions
A diversion to where? The one in Portage diverts the Assiniboine northwards into Lake Manitoba.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2013, 6:21 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Hmmm, I dunno
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Jul 7, 2013, 8:04 PM
RWin's Avatar
RWin RWin is offline
of Canada
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Calgary AB
Posts: 2,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmuzika View Post
We don't have the ability to go back into time and build the town somewhere else - it is where it is. Are you saying the town should be leveled and reconstructed on higher ground?
This isn't a bad idea. It's pretty much been leveled any way. Towns have moved in the past for lesser reasons than that. Although a town of 13000 is pretty big.

If I was a resident there, I wouldn't wait from someone to tell me to move.
__________________
All right... all right... but apart from better sanitation and medicine and education and irrigation and public health and roads and a freshwater system and baths and public order... what have the Romans done for us? NOTHING!
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:21 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.