HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted May 23, 2007, 3:13 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Disney anti-housing signatures delivered
Anaheim coalition says it got 21,243 names, more than enough to put on the ballot a referendum to reverse a council decision.
By Dave McKibben, Times Staff Writer
May 22, 2007

Supporters of a Disney-funded referendum that would prevent a 1,500-unit housing complex from being built near Disneyland said Monday they had gathered enough signatures to place the issue on the February ballot.

A coalition of business and community leaders said it delivered 21,243 signatures to Anaheim City Hall on Monday, three days before the deadline.

The coalition had 30 days to collect the signatures of 13,200 registered voters to rescind the council's 3-2 zoning approval for the controversial project, which would comprise 1,275 condominiums and 225 apartments for low-income families. The coalition includes state Sen. Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana), Anaheim Mayor Curt Pringle, former Mayor Tom Daly and Councilman Harry Sidhu.

"This was a tremendous challenge from the beginning, but we're elated with the massive amount of public support we've received," said Todd Ament, co-chairman of Save Our Anaheim Resort district. "To get 8,000 more signatures than we needed sends a clear message to the City Council to preserve the resort district that funds vital city services."

Supporters of the housing countered with a campaign that collected more than 2,000 cards from petition signers who had changed their minds, according to Anaheim city officials. City Clerk Linda Nguyen said her office could not accept withdrawal cards once the petitions were filed.

"We believe the Disney Corp. submitted their signatures several days before the deadline because they were aware of the steady growing numbers of Anaheim residents who had requested their signatures be withdrawn from the referendum petition," said Frank Elfend, who helped coordinate the withdrawal campaign and is a consultant on the housing project.

Supporters of the complex say it would help alleviate the city's housing shortage.

The referendum could join another Disney-backed initiative that would preserve tourist-only uses in the entire resort district. The Disney coalition has about 120 days to gather the required signatures for the initiative.

Disney, which also has filed a lawsuit challenging the proposed development on a 26-acre parcel on Katella Avenue, contends that such a project would jeopardize its vision for the 2.2-square-mile tourist-friendly area, which includes a third park and more hotels.

More than 100 volunteers and a few dozen paid signature gatherers participated in the referendum campaign, walking neighborhoods and staffing tables at shopping centers and community events. Disney contributed $100,000. Coalition members also pitched in to fund the campaign, which was launched two days after the council vote on the housing project.

On Saturday, coalition organizers concluded their campaign with three signing picnics that collected more than 1,000 total signatures. Nguyen said her office would review the signatures and forward them to the Orange County registrar's office, which has 30 days to verify them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted May 26, 2007, 11:29 PM
boi2socal boi2socal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 478
I have to go with Disney and agree housing should be limited. But then again Disney shouldn't really go around acting like they own Anaheim. Although they probably do. lol
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2007, 11:38 PM
Elruso Elruso is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverside, Orange, LA & San Bernardino Counties
Posts: 18
But how could they prevent the construction when it is already abot 12 stories up? And does anyone have more info on the project?
Im just wondering because I work right across the freeway and watching the building slowly rising...

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragonsky View Post
Now, the owners of an RV park on the far edge of the resort district want to build a 449-unit condo high-rise. The site, now home to the Anaheim RV Village, lies across Interstate 5 from Disneyland, barely within the boundaries of the resort district but squarely on Disney's hit list.

Developers of the proposed Parc Anaheim high-rise see the property, surrounded by two elementary schools, neighborhoods and the freeway, as a gateway to the city's downtown and generally unconnected to the tourist district.
Does that mean that Georges Burgers will go too? And the liquor store? Lol, I will miss Georges Burgers...
I wonder what prices will these condos have...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2007, 11:40 PM
Elruso Elruso is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverside, Orange, LA & San Bernardino Counties
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by boi2socal View Post
I have to go with Disney and agree housing should be limited. But then again Disney shouldn't really go around acting like they own Anaheim. Although they probably do. lol
I dont even understand Disney's point. Do they believe that the current trailer park looks better than the new highrise condos will be?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2007, 3:31 AM
ocman ocman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Burlingame
Posts: 2,691
Trailer parks can be rid of easily. But highrises are permanent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2007, 1:57 AM
Elruso Elruso is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverside, Orange, LA & San Bernardino Counties
Posts: 18
Hello everyone!

(if anyone cares) Here is a photo of the new highrise in front of Disneyland.
Sorry for the quality, I just took a quick shot while turning at the light...

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2007, 3:20 PM
Buckeye Native 001 Buckeye Native 001 is offline
E pluribus unum
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 31,280
When in the hell did that spring up? I haven't been near Disney Land since November...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2007, 6:46 PM
Elruso Elruso is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverside, Orange, LA & San Bernardino Counties
Posts: 18
Yeah, theyre quick. Im Watching them setting the pre-cast walls for the next floor right now. One more floor... I wonder how high will it be?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2007, 7:01 PM
interloper interloper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
What is that? A hotel, condos, aparatments? I'm gonna venture a guess hotel?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2007, 8:46 PM
Elruso Elruso is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverside, Orange, LA & San Bernardino Counties
Posts: 18
I am guessing that it is a part of the 1500-unit complex described above.
And also, right next to it, there is now another building going up. I am wondering if it is also the part of same complex:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2007, 9:55 PM
Elruso Elruso is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverside, Orange, LA & San Bernardino Counties
Posts: 18
Here is a view from across freeway:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2007, 10:52 PM
Buckeye Native 001 Buckeye Native 001 is offline
E pluribus unum
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 31,280
I guess I'll have to check that out. I've been meaning to do a photo thread on Anaheim for a while now anyway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2007, 2:12 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Wednesday, June 27, 2007
Adventure Playground opens for summer entertainment
By ANNIE BURRIS
THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER

HUNTINGTON BEACH – Adventure City doesn't have red plastic slides with wood chips – just mud, wood and rope.

Every summer, kids come to this playground in Central Park to take a raft out into a pond, zip down a tire swing, balance on a rope bridge, build their own forts and play on a mud slide.

They are encouraged to bring their oldest shoes.

"Kids can get dirty and have a different kind of fun," said Mark Hoxie, program coordinator. "There aren't open fields nowadays, but kids can come here and do that type of thing."

Adventure City opened Monday and will remain open throughout the summer from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Mondays through Fridays. The playground has been operating out of Central Park since 1981.

Cost is $2 for Huntington Beach children and $3 for children who don't live in the city or those in groups of 10 or more. Adults can enter free.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2007, 2:14 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Newport Harbor Nautical Museum
Charting a Course for Future Generations

Museum Facility Expansion

With the growing need for new and innovative cultural institutions in our community, the Newport Harbor Nautical Museum is expanding its facility and programs to reach a broader and more diverse audience.

In late 2005, the Museum successfully purchased 34,000 square-feet of waterfront property in the Fun Zone on the Balboa Peninsula, plus the adjacent docks, which will become the permanent home of the Museum and its Tall Ship program. By December 2006 we had completed the move from the riverboat "Pride of Newport", to our Balboa Peninsula home.

We have already opened the initial two phases of the new facility: the Richard and Betty Steele Model Pavilion and the East Wing Learning Center.

Our goal is to build a new facility large enough to showcase our growing collections, and significantly expand education and community outreach programs. The goal of the expansion is to become a world-class showcase for regional, national and international nautical and maritime history, becoming the cornerstone of a sought-after visitor destination.

Expected Results

* Educate visitors of all ages, abilities and economic levels by providing a meaningful nautical cultural experience through access to historic vessels, instructional programs, and traditional and contemporary interactive nautical exhibits.
* Expand our programming to reach a broader and
more diverse audience.
* Preserve a historic waterfront parcel, playing a major role in the revitalized harbor district.
* Awaken a sense of wonder about California’s coastline, encouraging understanding and stewardship of this region’s great natural resource.
* Create an example of sustainable economic and
heritage-based tourism development through a “green” environmentally-friendly building, transportation and strategic community alliances.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2007, 2:16 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Irvine council works to fund Great Park balloon
Ads on the craft itself or sponsor's logos elsewhere are under consideration.
By Tony Barboza, Times Staff Writer
June 27, 2007

The Irvine City Council wrestled Tuesday with how to pay the operating costs of a 75-foot-diameter helium balloon that will hover over the future Great Park and that is projected to run a $500,000 annual deficit.

The tethered passenger balloon will rise 500 feet above the old El Toro Marine base for the first time July 14 and will continue to operate four days a week after that, at a cost of $1.6 million a year.

But as the launch date looms, Irvine officials are considering using sponsorships, admission tickets and concessions to keep the orange balloon, envisioned as the iconic centerpiece of the park, aloft financially.

Under current plans, Irvine would charge adults $20 to ride the balloon after a free period that will last between a weekend and six months. But even with a 50,000 riders a year, the city would need to find more than $500,000 in additional revenue to break even.

Late Tuesday, the council voted unanimously to pursue advertising options with Lennar Corp. that will be used as a template for future sponsorships with others.

"The launching of the balloon is really the launching of the Great Park itself," said Larry Agran, mayor pro tempore and chairman of the Great Park board.

Agran said he supported offering free rides for the first six months. "By not initially charging families and individuals … in a way we will be creating a corps, an army really, of citizen ambassadors, who will tell people what they saw 500 feet below," he said.

But some Irvine officials have questioned the wisdom of spending so much on the balloon before it has proved it can attract visitors.

"I have serious doubts that until the park is fully developed and people will come for other purposes, the balloon won't attract second visits," said Councilman Steven Choi.

The anticipated deficit has led the council to consider other ways of recouping operating costs, including selling advertising on the balloon or the gondola, charging for parking, and planting sponsored flower beds in the shape of corporate logos in the 5-acre park that will surround the launch site.

The city has estimated it could make $95,000 a year charging for parking, $150,000 a year for logo-plantings and $250,000 a year selling a banner ad on the equator of the balloon.

But several council members have expressed concerns about the first manifestation of the public park looking overly commercial.

In a Great Park board meeting this month, Mayor Beth Krom said she wanted the balloon to be a "beautiful orange orb hovering above the landscape." She said she would not support an advertisement on its surface but was willing to look into small ads on the gondola.

Agran has called ads on the balloon itself "a big turnoff."

Much of the money the Great Park Corp. will spend on the balloon will come from fees paid to the city by Lennar Corp., which is building hundreds of homes around the future park. Lennar bought the $1-million balloon as a gift to the city and has pledged to sponsor it for $300,000 annually for its first three years.

Choi, who cast the only vote opposing the balloon contract earlier this year, said "to subsidize private pleasure with public money for six months would be excessive."

Up in the air
Visitors to Irvine's Great Park will be able to float 500 feet in the air aboard a tethered helium balloon starting in mid-July. Passengers will be able to ride free of charge at first, then the cost will be $20 for adults and $13 for children.
Balloon: 74 feet in diameter, filled with helium
Pilot: Controls craft from gondola
Gondola: Enclosed in safety netting; holds up to 30 adults.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2007, 2:34 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Anaheim's low-cost housing issue expands
What started as a dispute over resort land use has become a debate over a city's role in planning for housing that many can afford.
By Dave McKibben, Times Staff Writer
July 9, 2007



It began as a zoning spat between Disney and a developer over a plan to build 1,500 condos and low-cost apartments on the outskirts of Anaheim's Resort District.

But as the yearlong dispute has droned on — through the courts, neighborhood meetings and civic center discussion — what was once a small-town squabble has grown into a passionate showdown over low-cost housing.

Housing advocates, labor chiefs and, now, religious leaders have joined the debate, overwhelming Disney's argument that its interest in reserving the Resort District for tourism should not be turned into a forum on housing for low-wage earners.

Despite attempts by Disney and some Anaheim officials to steer the conversation, dozens of maids, switchboard operators and janitors have steadfastly kept the focus on what they call the city's "housing crisis" — urging the City Council with often emotional testimony to consider the benefits of the project's low-cost housing element.

Three weeks ago, about 500 members of Anaheim's religious community showed up at a housing forum, a clear signal that the neighborhood zoning quarrel between Disney and SunCal Cos. had become a genuine movement in the state's 10th-largest city.

At the next night's council meeting, religious leaders delivered 200 letters from Roman Catholic families seeking lower-cost housing on a different piece of property — 53 acres of undeveloped, city-owned land next to Angel Stadium.

"Our families are in a crisis," said Freddy Hernandez, a leader at St. Boniface Catholic Church. "Many parents and children are enduring the heavy burden of living in overpriced, substandard, overcrowded conditions.

"There is a sense of urgency, but working together we can find solutions to this crisis. We also wanted to let you know that we are here to stay."

Lorri Galloway, the only council member to attend the forum, said she welcomed a "new demographic of support" to the issue she has championed since being elected three years ago.

"That room [the forum] was just the beginning of a movement," she said. "It was a signal that the housing shortage isn't just affecting the working poor. It's become a cause for everyone in Anaheim."

So far, the issue has failed to gain the attention of a majority of the council. Mayor Curt Pringle believes the city's 2-year-old affordable-housing strategic plan, which calls for 1,328 low-cost units to be built over four years, will meet the community's needs.

The Kennedy Commission, a local advocacy group for low-cost housing, credits Anaheim with planning for more low-cost units than most Orange County cities. But Cesar Covarrubias, a project manager for the nonprofit organization, said Anaheim was still falling short of meeting the housing demands of working families.

Under benchmarks commonly used by planners and housing authorities, a home is considered "affordable" if those who live in it make 120% or less of an area's median income and the mortgage payment or rent isn't more than a third of the household's earnings. The median income in Orange County is $78,700.

Although housing needs are based on complex formulas, advocates say the bottom line is that the true low-wage earners — such as those who work in the city's Resort District — are pressed to find housing in Anaheim.

Covarrubias said, for instance, that the city recently approved 11,091 units for families earning more than $78,000, but only 314 for those earning less. "There is a really high imbalance there," he said.

A recent study by the Orange County Business Council rated Anaheim fourth among the county's 34 cities in meeting its workforce's housing needs from 1991 to 2005, but the study did not examine low-cost housing. The yearlong study projected that Anaheim would lead the county in overall housing growth over the next 25 years.

"The business council believes that affordability begins with availability, and that we need an increase in housing in all price ranges," said Lucy Dunn, chief executive of the business group. "Anaheim is at the top of the list among cities that recognize that we are urbanizing as a county. They are producing and approving housing to match their jobs growth."

Many in Anaheim argue that the city shouldn't be in the business of creating low-cost housing.

"Are we obligated to build low-cost housing for everyone who can't afford it?" Elaine Proko, a 45-year Anaheim resident, asked during a council meeting. "I don't understand how people can take a job for $7 an hour and expect to support a family. I just don't feel it's Anaheim's job to provide low-cost housing."

Many parishioners who turned out for the religious conference belong to the Orange County Congregation Community Organization, a coalition of 20 mostly Catholic churches. San Antonio de Padua del Can~on, a 3,000-member parish in Anaheim Hills, was one of the forum's host churches.

Linda Ross, a member of San Antonio's Peace and Justice Committee, said her group got involved in the divisive topic after church surveys identified affordable housing as a "crisis situation."

"Yes, we're an affluent parish, but we are concerned with protecting human dignity and improving the entire community's quality of life," Ross said. "We discovered that, although Anaheim is taking steps to alleviate the housing crunch, they were so far behind, they're really playing catch-up. It needs to be accelerated."

Jonas Geronimo, a St. Boniface parishioner, said he wasn't always keen on the concept of low-cost housing.

"I've come to realize affordable housing isn't just a social issue, but a moral one," he said. "What would Jesus tell us to do? I think he would spread the message of love and brotherhood and helping your neighbor. Everyone deserves a decent living environment."

Maria Mejia, a 32-year-old mother who shares a tiny mobile home with four family members, said she had been frustrated by the City Council's lack of enthusiasm in building more low-cost housing throughout the city.

"It seems like they really don't think we are as important as other people," she said.

Councilwoman Lucille Kring said she couldn't attend the housing forum because of a prior commitment, but acknowledged that the pressure was increasing on city leaders to act.

"You've got to do something with housing," she said. "You can't just say, 'Irvine, go build another 500-unit, low-cost complex.' But there's no easy answer to this. There's only so many developers, so much land and so much money."

Much of the housing debate in Anaheim has centered on the 2.2-square-mile Resort District. Disney and tourism officials say they are not opposed to the notion of creating more low-cost housing, but they believe the resort should be dedicated to tourism and the enormous tax revenue it yields.

"The community needs to address housing for all segments of the community," said Disney spokesman Rob Doughty. "We've never said it's not an important issue. But we also need to protect the resort area as the largest single source of funds for Anaheim."

Religious coalition leaders say they are staying out of the high-profile housing fight in the Resort District, partly because some members have sided with Disney and others don't believe the entertainment giant can be beaten in the courts or at the ballot box.

Instead, they are concentrating on the Platinum Triangle, a sprouting urban village where about 9,000 homes are planned within five to 10 years.

None of those units have been designated as "affordable." But the Platinum Triangle land next to Angel Stadium is in the city's redevelopment zone and developer Archstone-Smith and Hines has plans for up to 1,100 apartments, 20% of which could be available to low-income families.

The potential glitch is that under terms of the Angels' 1996 stadium lease, homes must be approved by the team owner, now Arte Moreno. Councilman Harry Sidhu said he was not opposed to building low-cost homes on the stadium property, but sees it as unrealistic.

"I wish we had a magic wand so we could say, 'Yes, on this particular piece of land, we can build affordable housing,' " Sidhu said. "But we don't have the control. It's in the hands of Arte Moreno. So I don't think it'll ever happen there."

But religious leaders and others say the council is not being forceful enough on creating low-income housing in the Platinum Triangle.

Amin David, who heads Los Amigos of Orange County, a Latino advocacy group, said Anaheim leaders may be underestimating the momentum building on the low-cost housing issue.

"The City Council is making a wild calculation that all these groups pushing more housing have no vote," he said. "But the fact is, they're residents and they should be attended to."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2007, 4:03 AM
Buckeye Native 001 Buckeye Native 001 is offline
E pluribus unum
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 31,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by dragonsky View Post
Newport Harbor Nautical Museum
Charting a Course for Future Generations

Museum Facility Expansion

With the growing need for new and innovative cultural institutions in our community, the Newport Harbor Nautical Museum is expanding its facility and programs to reach a broader and more diverse audience.

In late 2005, the Museum successfully purchased 34,000 square-feet of waterfront property in the Fun Zone on the Balboa Peninsula, plus the adjacent docks, which will become the permanent home of the Museum and its Tall Ship program. By December 2006 we had completed the move from the riverboat "Pride of Newport", to our Balboa Peninsula home.

We have already opened the initial two phases of the new facility: the Richard and Betty Steele Model Pavilion and the East Wing Learning Center.

Our goal is to build a new facility large enough to showcase our growing collections, and significantly expand education and community outreach programs. The goal of the expansion is to become a world-class showcase for regional, national and international nautical and maritime history, becoming the cornerstone of a sought-after visitor destination.

Expected Results

* Educate visitors of all ages, abilities and economic levels by providing a meaningful nautical cultural experience through access to historic vessels, instructional programs, and traditional and contemporary interactive nautical exhibits.
* Expand our programming to reach a broader and
more diverse audience.
* Preserve a historic waterfront parcel, playing a major role in the revitalized harbor district.
* Awaken a sense of wonder about California’s coastline, encouraging understanding and stewardship of this region’s great natural resource.
* Create an example of sustainable economic and
heritage-based tourism development through a “green” environmentally-friendly building, transportation and strategic community alliances.
Shit, that'll be a nice addition to what is already my favorite part of Orange County
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2007, 6:10 AM
Upward's Avatar
Upward Upward is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,047
I hope they leave room for Bluth's Frozen Bananas.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2007, 2:38 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
Garden Grove has vision for Harbor Boulevard
By DEEPA BHARATH
THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER

GARDEN GROVE – A city-hired consultant’s recommendations to slow down on pursuing a casino and to explore more realistic ideas for theme parks in its resort area may not necessarily dissuade officials from doing just that.

Consultant John Husing, respected for his insights into the economy and politics of Southern California, will make a series of recommendations at a City Council study session tonight. He is recommending that the city pursue hotel development and a Wal-Mart, explore “less ambitious’’ theme park ideas and cool off on trying to bring a casino to town.

Husing urges the city to go after sales tax dollars by pursuing big box retail such as Wal-Mart. This, he says, would prevent the money from hemorrhaging into neighboring cities. Wal-Mart is proposing a two-story, 173,157-square-foot Supercenter at 9852 Chapman Ave., a 10.3-acre site west of Brookhurst Street.

Although on track with Wal-Mart, the city seems to be looking to “hit a home run” every time when it comes to resort development, said Husing, whose report delves into the city’s demographics, revenue streams and redevelopment areas.

“Not everyone is going to hit it out of the park and that’s OK,” he said.

The smart move would be to have something smaller and more realistic, which complements the world-famous destinations in neighboring Anaheim, Husing said.

City Manager Matt Fertal said Monday that although Husing makes those recommendations, he and other economic development staff feel the need to take advantage of opportunities that come their way – be it casinos or giant theme parks.

“We know theme parks or casinos are ambitious projects and we know the amount of work and the hurdles involved,” he said. “And we know that we might not be successful. But ignoring those possibilities and opportunities would be almost irresponsible.”

The city is in talks with the Gabrielino Tongva Indian Tribe, which is interested in building a casino in the so-called entertainment hub of the resort on Harbor Boulevard. But the tribe is not yet federally recognized and many legislative hurdles have yet to crossed.

Still, Fertal says there is no harm in showing interest and talking to these developers.

“Under certain circumstances, it could happen here in Garden Grove,” he said. “We’re in a very attractive position for either a casino or a theme park given our proximity to Disneyland.”

Garden Grove officials have spent the last several years looking for ideas to develop the city-designated InternationalWEST resort area off Harbor. They envision high-end hotels, theme parks, restaurants, retail and an entertainment hub. Officials have also been talking to theme park developers to explore the possibility of a studio-based park such as Universal.

The city’s experience trying to hook theme park developers into the resort area has been somewhat of a rollercoaster ride. In the past, developers have brought proposals for everything from a riverwalk much like the one in San Antonio, a music-themed attraction, an aquarium and nature center with wildlife exhibits and even an “Oasis of Peace,” a museum showcasing King Hussein’s history and artifacts. None of those ideas materialized.

But council members say they have no problem with that.

“We just need one idea to stick and that’ll do it,” Councilman Mark Rosen said. “We’re still waiting for it, but if it happens, the rewards are great.”

Rosen said Husing’s report in many ways confirms what he has known for a while.

“The report emphasizes developing hotels on Harbor,” he said. “That’s something we’ve been doing all along and intend to continue doing.”

The report states that the city’s revenue from hotel bed tax grew six fold – to $8.24 million in 2005 from $1.45 million in 1999.

Fertal said the report also recommends the city “keep housing affordable and attractive” to help retain its work force.

“The modern condo concepts we have in downtown should help us develop more attractive housing options, especially geared to younger people,” he said.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2007, 2:39 AM
dragonsky dragonsky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,132
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
Platinum Triangle project OK'd
A 1,200-home development including a pedestrian bridge goes to the City Council.
By SARAH TULLY
The Orange County Register



ANAHEIM – The second-largest development in the Platinum Triangle, including an office tower with a pedestrian bridge, is heading to the transforming urban neighborhood by Angel Stadium.

On Monday, the Planning Commission approved, 6-0, the Gene Autry Experience development with 1,208 homes, including a street-front park lined with a retail strip and buildings up to 300 feet high. Commissioner Cecilia Flores was absent.

The City Council also must consider the development.

"It needs to be the place in Anaheim that no one else has seen," said urban planner Ken Ryan, a principal of KTGY Group Inc.

The Gene Autry Experience would sit across the street from the biggest Platinum Triangle project – Lennar Corp.'s A-Town with 2,681 homes under construction. Currently, the Catch Restaurant and businesses in industrial buildings are on the 17.5-acre site.

"You are setting the standard higher for future developments," Commissioner Joseph Karaki said to the developer.

Responding to questions about environmental impacts, a city-hired firm presented a memo that the project is not expected to have a "significant impact" on global warming.

Two audience members spoke about the project, including Tom Rizzuti, facilities planning assistant director of the Anaheim City School District.

Although the district receives fees to build schools from developers, Rizzuti urged the commission to make sure there is space to build elementary schools needed to accommodate new residents. The district, which has little open land, runs seven schools on year-round schedules and has 200 portable classrooms because of overcrowding. No school sites are slated in the Platinum Triangle.

The developer said few children are expected to live there.

With the vote, the commission also hiked the maximum number of homes allowed in the Platinum Triangle from 9,567 to 10,266 homes.

The Angels, which have a lease on the land across the street, would need to sign off on the construction of the pedestrian bridge to their stadium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:26 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.