HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8201  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2017, 3:47 AM
NativeOrange's Avatar
NativeOrange NativeOrange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Westminster/Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by Car(e)-Free LA View Post
What do you think the chances are of its passage? I doubt it has the support of most Angelinos, but will people bother to vote against it in a spring election?
The worry is that most who vote during spring elections will likely be the demographic that votes against it. Not enough young people vote during smaller elections. Another thing is the massive amount of "undecided" voters. That could go either way but Measure S supporters have been really pushing it. I've seen a few large billboards for "Yes on S", which worries me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8202  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2017, 9:36 PM
hughfb3 hughfb3 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 829
Lots of big news recently in Los Angeles. Just announced... The new LA Stadium at Hollywood Park; home of the Rams and "ehew" the Chargers, and the LA Coliseum will split the opening and closing ceremonies of the 2024 Olympic Games.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8203  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2017, 3:35 AM
ozone's Avatar
ozone ozone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 2,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by NativeOrange View Post
The worry is that most who vote during spring elections will likely be the demographic that votes against it. Not enough young people vote during smaller elections. Another thing is the massive amount of "undecided" voters. That could go either way but Measure S supporters have been really pushing it. I've seen a few large billboards for "Yes on S", which worries me.
I wondering what LA forumers imagine could happen if Measure S passes? How will it affect future development and is there any way that it could actually be a good thing?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8204  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2017, 3:37 AM
ChargerCarl ChargerCarl is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles/San Francisco
Posts: 2,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozone View Post
I wondering what LA forumers imagine could happen if Measure S passes? How will it affect future development and is there any way that it could actually be a good thing?
If it passes my only hope is things get so dire on the affordability front that it will prompt action from action from the state to undergo sweeping land use reform.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8205  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2017, 4:34 AM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozone View Post
I wondering what LA forumers imagine could happen if Measure S passes? How will it affect future development and is there any way that it could actually be a good thing?
Measure S would only be positive in that it would finally cause the city to update the zoning and planning laws, formally allowing the type of development that previously needed a special exemption. Measure S is, after all, only a symptom of a larger problem that should have been addressed years ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8206  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2017, 6:54 PM
bobbyv bobbyv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 301
Sickening story from the Los Angeles Business Journal, why more public scrutiny hasn't been given to AHF for it's misappropriation of funds baffles me.

http://labusinessjournal.com/news/20...e-fundraising/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8207  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2017, 8:01 PM
a very long weekend's Avatar
a very long weekend a very long weekend is offline
dazzle me
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: 94109
Posts: 824
it's rare that a measure is wholeheartedly bad, but measure S is undoubtedly that. LA is way underzoned and spot zoning is essential to just try to keep up.

if it passes, pretty much the only good thing to come out of it, like other forumers have said, is that it would push the state to tackle NIMBY-induced unaffordability with sweeping state measures. that would suck for us up here, because as pro-growth as i am, i want it concentrated in certain neighborhoods (leave the haight alone, grow the southern and western neighborhoods). but overall, if it's for the greater good, then so be it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8208  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2017, 2:06 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,495
It's official. The large park and ride lot adjacent to the Expo Line's Culver City Station will close on February 14, making way for the construction of the Ivy Station TOD. This project ranks near the top of my list of what I consider the most important, game-changing projects.

http://thesource.metro.net/2017/01/1...w-development/
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8209  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2017, 2:37 AM
King Kill 'em King Kill 'em is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pyongyang
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quixote View Post
It's official. The large park and ride lot adjacent to the Expo Line's Culver City Station will close on February 14, making way for the construction of the Ivy Station TOD. This project ranks near the top of my list of what I consider the most important, game-changing projects.

http://thesource.metro.net/2017/01/1...w-development/
It should've been bigger but its excellent design makes up for its size.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8210  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2017, 7:07 AM
ChelseaFC's Avatar
ChelseaFC ChelseaFC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 983
You wonder how long it will take before Howard Industries sells its building to some developer looking to do something similar to the Ivy. Thinking of the value of that land, it's hard to imagine they wouldn't be able to come out way ahead by selling to some developer and relocating their facility to a more industrial conducive area.

The anti-pedestrian car dealerships on Washington, however, seem far less likely to vacate their premises, given the lack of alternate sites elsewhere in Culver City.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8211  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2017, 8:47 PM
King Kill 'em King Kill 'em is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pyongyang
Posts: 1,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChelseaFC View Post
You wonder how long it will take before Howard Industries sells its building to some developer looking to do something similar to the Ivy. Thinking of the value of that land, it's hard to imagine they wouldn't be able to come out way ahead by selling to some developer and relocating their facility to a more industrial conducive area.

The anti-pedestrian car dealerships on Washington, however, seem far less likely to vacate their premises, given the lack of alternate sites elsewhere in Culver City.
I realized recently there is one good thing about car dealerships being the last thing to go when redeveloping around a transit station. Their sites will be fully utilized. Take North Hollywood station area for example. Look at the buildings that were first built in the early 2000s when the station opened. 3 story residential. Way too small. When the Ford dealer north of the station finally decides to sell, hopefully we'll get a tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8212  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2017, 8:53 PM
bobbyv bobbyv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 301
New renderings for century city towers:


http://la.curbed.com/2017/1/20/14337...s-century-city
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8213  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2017, 10:38 PM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,014
Looks incredible. This is shaping up to be my favorite upcoming project in Los Angeles. Love the respect towards the cities mid century architectural heritage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8214  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2017, 12:38 AM
SLO's Avatar
SLO SLO is offline
REAL Kiwi!
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: California & Texas
Posts: 17,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illithid Dude View Post
Looks incredible. This is shaping up to be my favorite upcoming project in Los Angeles. Love the respect towards the cities mid century architectural heritage.
Totally agree, that was a great keep on their part. It'd be great if they could be a bit taller than the rest of the towers, but its an awesome address anyway.
__________________
'Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*ck things up' - Barack Obama
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8215  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2017, 2:04 AM
CaliNative CaliNative is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by hughfb3 View Post
Lots of big news recently in Los Angeles. Just announced... The new LA Stadium at Hollywood Park; home of the Rams and "ehew" the Chargers, and the LA Coliseum will split the opening and closing ceremonies of the 2024 Olympic Games.
I think Paris will get 2024. 100th anniversery of 1924 Olympics in Paris, made famous in "Chariots of Fire". L.A. a good pick for '28 or '32.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8216  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2017, 2:13 AM
CaliNative CaliNative is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by a very long weekend View Post
it's rare that a measure is wholeheartedly bad, but measure S is undoubtedly that. LA is way underzoned and spot zoning is essential to just try to keep up.

if it passes, pretty much the only good thing to come out of it, like other forumers have said, is that it would push the state to tackle NIMBY-induced unaffordability with sweeping state measures. that would suck for us up here, because as pro-growth as i am, i want it concentrated in certain neighborhoods (leave the haight alone, grow the southern and western neighborhoods). but overall, if it's for the greater good, then so be it.
I'm against measure S, and I hope the construction unions & builders fund a "NO on S" campaign. The fallacy of "S" is that restricting building and new supply of housing will somehow keep housing affordable. They don't understand supply & demand. Or maybe they do...by restricting new housing supply, current homeowners & apt owners will reap higher house prices & rents because of scarcity. Totally selfish.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8217  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2017, 2:56 AM
112597jorge 112597jorge is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: LA/OC
Posts: 388
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliNative View Post
I'm against measure S, and I hope the construction unions & builders fund a "NO on S" campaign. The fallacy of "S" is that restricting building and new supply of housing will somehow keep housing affordable. They don't understand supply & demand. Or maybe they do...by restricting new housing supply, current homeowners & apt owners will reap higher house prices & rents because of scarcity. Totally selfish.
That's exactly what's going on. If I don't see any campaign for "NO ON S" is very tempted to take it upon myself and hand out flyers in neighborhoods of high turnout for the march elections.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8218  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2017, 6:24 AM
Heartofthecity's Avatar
Heartofthecity Heartofthecity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbyv View Post
New renderings for century city towers:


http://la.curbed.com/2017/1/20/14337...s-century-city
Will these be the tallest buildings in Century City?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8219  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2017, 1:02 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,933
Those residential towers are going to have some incredible views.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8220  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2017, 5:46 PM
Bwin517 Bwin517 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 99
I believe these towers will be the tallest in SoCal outside of DTLA
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:30 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.