HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2014, 6:48 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is online now
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,859
Demolition freeze may cover 80% of the city (NYC)

Demolition freeze may cover 80% of the city

Quote:
Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer's bid to protect buildings over age 50 frightens developers, construction unions and housing activists.


A politician's proposal to protect the thousands of older buildings in New York that face demolition each year has triggered a backlash not just among powerful developers, but also among construction unions and advocates for affordable housing who fear the measure could drastically curb residential construction in the city.

The storm began on April 4 at a protest outside the stately, likely-to-be-razed Rizzoli bookstore on West 57th Street, when Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer pledged to do more to prevent such losses in the future. She offered to introduce a bill that would require a 30-day review by the Landmarks Preservation Commission of any demolition permit filed for a building over 50 years old. The measure would apply to nearly 80% of the city's structures and 91% of those in Manhattan, according to city data.
"We'll see what we end up with—it's possible we could go older than 50 years," Ms. Brewer allowed in a follow-up email responding to a question from Crain's. She said she has invited the Real Estate Board of New York and the Landmarks Conservancy to sit down with her and discuss the proposal, which is still being written.


Even extending the threshold age to 80 years, however, would still mean that the law would cover more than half the buildings in the city—and going back a century would still put more than half of Manhattan's properties in the group to be reviewed. Automatically bringing that many buildings under the purview of Landmarks, which would have the power to halt construction, has members of the development community—including Richard Anderson, president of the New York Building Congress—worried. He notes many buildings with zero historical significance would be brought into the fold, potentially slowing down one of the city's key economic engines—construction.

"Generally, replacement buildings are an improvement, but if an existing structure should be considered a landmark, we have a process for that," Mr. Anderson said. "To put everything under a blanket review—I don't see the basis to do that."

Quote:
AGING STRUCTURES

Number of buildings constructed before 1965, and percentage of total buildings
New York City
654,420 (80%)
Manhattan
37,157 (91%)
Brooklyn
233,828 (88%)
Queens
272,020 (87%)
Bronx
66,190 (79%)
Staten Island
45,225 (40%)
Source: NYC Department of Finance
==========================================
http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article...80-of-the-city
April 14, 2014
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:45 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.