HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #441  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2019, 9:09 PM
Leo Leo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by hat View Post
I am slightly confused by the design options given here. Perhaps it's my lack of any experience in architecture or urban design. If others can clarify, please do.

As I understand it, the park space and Green Loop route depend entirely on a primarily flat park, as indicated by the "Green Loop Climb" and soccer field in the rendering. The impracticality of this as a cycling route is fairly obvious to anyone who commutes. Is there a reason why the "Connected open space" necessarily needs to be 0 grade? Is it more difficulty to design buildings on a slight slope? Is there a reason why the ROW on Hoyt must be retained? Is a park on a gentle grade not preferred? I have many questions.

Given the switchbacks, I can imagine very few cyclists using the design as intended, opting to take the shared access street instead. Perhaps this is the intention?
Well, it's zero grade today, so you would have to create the grade first. Not technically impossible, but some extra work and cost. And you would pay that extra work and cost entirely for the benefit of bike commuters. For almost every other use, a flat park would work better.

Personally, I don't think that a park should be designed primarily for commuter traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #442  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2019, 10:06 PM
zilfondel zilfondel is offline
Submarine de Nucléar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,477
As a bike commuter, I agree that the switchback concept is a little... difficult. I think most bike commuters will just proceed up either Lovejoy or Broadway itself.

It seems like an enormous expense to raise the height of the ground some 25+' over several acres. You could do it, but why? Its not very sustainable and will require thousands of dump truck loads of fill.

Then there is the issue that it creates a dark, enclosed pedestrian street immediately to its north. Also, the park should have more uses than a play field, dont you guys think?

I'd like to see better integration with the zig-zag with a building, maybe like the original ramp idea for the James Beard project, or that crazy 8 House by Bjarke Ingels:

https://www.archdaily.com/83307/8-house-big

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-q-e9_KFcoY
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #443  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2019, 7:33 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
The Central City Master Plan has been submitted.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #444  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 2:24 AM
winstonLT5's Avatar
winstonLT5 winstonLT5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 51
Stumbled across the latest renderings of The Spar, PATH Architecture's "world's tallest mass-timber building" concept for the Broadway corridor. This is at least the third revision, trimmed down to 36 floors now, but looking very sleek. Fantasy perhaps, but one can dream...

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #445  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 9:28 AM
urbanlife's Avatar
urbanlife urbanlife is offline
A before E
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
Posts: 11,784
It would be amazing to have the third tallest tower in Portland be a timber tower. Granted, it would be cool if the whole Broadway Corridor site was a timber complex. Having a district in the city that celebrated the use of wood would be an iconic thing for Portland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #446  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 11:33 AM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #447  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2019, 4:42 PM
Natural Natural is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Wonderland
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife View Post
It would be amazing to have the third tallest tower in Portland be a timber tower. Granted, it would be cool if the whole Broadway Corridor site was a timber complex. Having a district in the city that celebrated the use of wood would be an iconic thing for Portland.
Can anybody give an estimation comparing a Timber Tower construction cost versus a conventional steel Tower construction cost? Would this Timber Tower actually pencil out?

Last edited by Natural; Dec 29, 2019 at 10:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #448  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2019, 6:06 PM
AcmeGreg AcmeGreg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 132
Interesting how Path's design is so similar to that expressed in William Kraven's twin towers. I do like the pattern of arrows within the skin of Path's building, creating a subtle "forest" effect - an obvious metaphor re the "bones" of the structure, of which the viewer would otherwise not be aware.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #449  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2019, 7:43 PM
Pavlov's Dog Pavlov's Dog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 356
FWIW here is the current world's tallest wooden building. It's a hotel in rural Norway that opened March, 2019



Image credit - Voll Architects

Project page for Wood Hotel

It's only 80 meters or 260 feet so this proposal is significantly taller and larger
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #450  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 8:13 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
Central City Master Plan Drawings [49 MB].
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #451  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2020, 12:43 AM
astronomer astronomer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1
Odd that all of the maps on pages 48-53, which exist to illustrate the surrounding traffic flow, have all banished Glisan, with the street grid jumping straight from Flanders to Hoyt.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #452  
Old Posted Jan 21, 2020, 5:22 PM
eric cantona's Avatar
eric cantona eric cantona is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 671
Quote:
Originally Posted by astronomer View Post
Odd that all of the maps on pages 48-53, which exist to illustrate the surrounding traffic flow, have all banished Glisan, with the street grid jumping straight from Flanders to Hoyt.
alphabetting is hard.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #453  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2020, 8:48 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
Quote:
Broadway Corridor update: Activists want to lock in social benefits, including wage standards and diversity

Portland leaders and community organizers are on the back stretch of negotiating an agreement that will underpin efforts to redevelop the Broadway Corridor between the Pearl District and Old Town Chinatown for years to come.

Prosper Portland and the Healthy Communities Coalition are hashing out what’s called a community benefits agreement. By signing the agreement, the coalition — which cuts across environmental, social justice and organized labor interests, according to Prosper Portland — would essentially sign away its rights to protest the project. In return, it would secure certain benefits for the redevelopment.

Healthy Communities wants all workers, including people of color and women, to have equal access to construction jobs for the project, fair benefits and wages for those who construct the buildings and later work inside of them and a labor agreement for the project, among other terms. The redevelopment is expected to generate approximately 6,000 construction jobs.
...continues at the Portland Business Journal.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #454  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2020, 1:53 AM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
Quote:
Portland parks will spend $8 million to extend North Park Blocks as part of Broadway Corridor redevelopment

Portland’s parks department says it plans to use up to $8 million in fees paid by developers to turn a city-owned downtown parking lot into new public green space.

The move to redevelop the lot near the Pacific Northwest College of Art along Northwest Glisan Street would extend the North Park Blocks one square block toward the city’s vacant central post office site, which is also slated for redevelopment.

The money would come from system development charges and it would cover planning, design and construction costs, said Mark Ross, a parks and recreation spokesperson.

“We are optimistic that some funds may remain after the North Park Blocks project,” Ross said. Any remaining money, he said, would likely be put toward a new park planned to be built on the post office site.
...continues at the Oregonian.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #455  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2020, 5:50 AM
subterranean subterranean is online now
Registered Ugly
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portland
Posts: 3,644
Good news.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #456  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2020, 10:08 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
Central City Master Plan Staff Report.

New River District Right-of-Way Standards draft and memo.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #457  
Old Posted May 30, 2020, 6:03 PM
pdxsg34 pdxsg34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 317
Demo Permit now under review

Quote:
OLD USPS VMF DEMOLITION - the abatement and demolition of the facility, and the removal of an underground storage tank and contaminated soil remediation around the tank, facility and in the nw corner of the lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #458  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2020, 2:46 AM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
Design Review #2 Drawings [54 MB].
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #459  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2020, 3:48 AM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
Staff Report, which recommends approval
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #460  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2020, 5:13 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 7,405
On Wednesday the Prosper Portland board approved a Community Benefits Agreement with the Healthy Communities Coalition and a Disposition and Development Agreements with Continuum Partners.

The masterplan went in front of the Design Commission on Thursday, and is likely to be approved next week after some finessing of the conditions of approval.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

www.twitter.com/maccoinnich
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Downtown & City of Portland
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:33 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.