Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook
Not sure about old and tainted. 1974, when it was built, is not that old in the scheme of things. Maybe just somewhat ugly. But not as ugly as 1900 Arch...
|
I think there's an implied comma in his comment: "Great combination of new and old, tainted by 1650 Arch . . . ," i.e., "old" doesn't refer to 1650 Arch.