HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5301  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2019, 1:17 AM
plutonicpanda plutonicpanda is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 623
I still plan on responding to a post made awhile ago though I had completely forgotten about it. Another day.

In other news(that I don't like), in case anyone didn't know, the freeway portion of the HDC has been canceled or rather put on an indefinite hold. Many here should be happy. San Diego backing out on long planned freeway projects, 710 tunnel canceled and 710 south expansion being put on hold indefinitely, and now this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5302  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2019, 2:25 AM
DenseCityPlease's Avatar
DenseCityPlease DenseCityPlease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: California
Posts: 77
Excellent news.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5303  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2019, 5:42 AM
Will O' Wisp Will O' Wisp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: San Diego
Posts: 481
Quote:
Originally Posted by plutonicpanda View Post
San Diego backing out on long planned freeway projects.
Ha, you give us too much credit.


Quote:

Roads compromise wins passage at SANDAG
David Ross | on October 05, 2019

Last week a coalition of cities led by Escondido Mayor Paul McNamara and Poway Mayor Steve Vaus, but with a strong assist from Supervisors Kristin Gaspar of the 3rd District and Jim Desmond of the 5th District persuaded the SANDAG (San Diego Association of Governments) board to reprioritize some monies for the roads.

Before Friday’s vote the staff had proposed a set of priorities that moved a large share of funding from TransNet that had been approved by the voters for road improvements for Hwy 78 and Hwy 67 to mass transit. This had fomented something of a revolt among cities that were affected by the vote.

At Friday’s vote the board voted to include $600 million on a spending plan to could add new lanes to Hwy 67 and 78 and prioritize improvements for Hwy 52.

After the vote Gaspar commented, “The vote represented a huge win for our coalition. By allocating the necessary funds to the 67, the 78 and the 52, we have taken a big step in the right direction. I am cautiously optimistic, but we must remain vigilant to ensure our priority projects are completed.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5304  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2019, 11:39 PM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by numble View Post
A lot of new information on the Crenshaw Northern extension at the next West Hollywood City Council meeting. The alignments under consideration new include a hybrid of the San Vincente and Fairfax alignments, more underground sections for the alignments, including the La a Brea alignment now fully underground.

It would be nice to see E and one of the other alignments. There is no technical reason why the Crenshaw Line can't have two different routes on it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5305  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2019, 3:58 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
L.A. City Councilman Wants to Speed Up the Expo Line

https://urbanize.la/post/la-city-cou...peed-expo-line

Quote:
.....

- Since opening in 2012, Metro's Expo Line has stood out as a rare success at time in which transit patronage has declined in Los Angeles County. But the light rail line, which runs predominantly at-grade between Downtown Los Angeles and Santa Monica, is frequently forced to stop for cross traffic at 22 ungated intersections along its route. But a fix may finally be in the works, according to a motion introduced last week by Los Angeles City Councilmember Mike Bonin. --- The motion, if adopted, would instruct the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to maximize signal priority for the Expo Line at street crossings and report back to the City Council within 60 days on strategies to speed end-to-end travel times and improve on-time reliability by 90 percent.

.....
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5306  
Old Posted Oct 16, 2019, 6:24 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,356
^A fine example of "WTF you mean this isn't already being done?"
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5307  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2019, 3:56 AM
jmecklenborg jmecklenborg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,160
I visited LA in September and got a few shots.

Crenshaw Line crossing the 405:


Crenshaw Line near LAX:


Driving on the 405 under the Crenshaw Line overpass:




Puple Line construction at Fairfax:






Expo at Bundy:


We rode the Expo line to the beach and then rode scooters back on the trail.






Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5308  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2019, 1:54 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is online now
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by M II A II R II K View Post
L.A. City Councilman Wants to Speed Up the Expo Line

https://urbanize.la/post/la-city-cou...peed-expo-line

definitely. its pokey.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5309  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 10:24 PM
SoCalKid SoCalKid is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 453
Maybe I missed this earlier, but it looks like the Expo line shaved 1 minute off of it's earlier schedule, with 46 minutes eastbound and 47 minutes westbound vs 47 minutes and 48 minutes before. Hopefully they can shave off enough with the Bonin signal priority/preemption motion to get the end-to-end time down to 40 minutes. That would make the travel time truly competitive with cars during non-peak hours, and a clear winner during peak hours.

media.metro.net/documents/ab0e991c-13e2-47ad-99ee-470f88e49255.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5310  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2019, 3:48 PM
202_Cyclist's Avatar
202_Cyclist 202_Cyclist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,935
Crenshaw line

This is exciting, construction on the Crenshaw line is really moving along.

Train testing underway on southern part of Crenshaw/LAX Line

"The Crenshaw/LAX Line reached a nice milestone this past week with the beginning of train testing on a 1.4-mile segment of track adjacent to LAX — the southernmost part of the project. Check out the above video.

In that segment, trains are now being powered by the overhead wires and reaching regular speeds. Signal and systems testing began in September, when a train first traveled from the Green Line tracks onto the new Crenshaw/LAX Line tracks. The overall project is 93 percent complete and we’re definitely seeing progress — although there is still work, testing and training to be done..."

https://thesource.metro.net/2019/11/...shaw-lax-line/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5311  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2019, 7:02 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by 202_Cyclist View Post
This is exciting, construction on the Crenshaw line is really moving along.
I would hope so, as it's already 2 years behind schedule.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5312  
Old Posted Nov 16, 2019, 12:41 AM
numble numble is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 223
The feasibility report for the Sepulveda Transit Corridor is complete. The report suggests that using a single-bore tunnel would help resolve issues with ventilation shafts and cross-passage mining under the mountains.

https://twitter.com/numble/status/11...670273543?s=21
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5313  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2019, 8:47 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,139
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5314  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2020, 2:38 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,498
From three weeks ago, but still post-worthy.

Quote:
Study finds Metrolink's rail system rebuild will create 1.3M jobs

December 18, 2019

Southern California can expect an economic boost of 1.3 million jobs and an increase to the gross regional product of almost $684 billion through 2050 as the result of Metrolink’s Southern California Optimized Rail Expansion (SCORE) Program, according to a new Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC) study. LAEDC presented the findings at a meeting of the Metrolink Board of Directors.

SCORE is a 10-year, $10 billion capital improvement program to upgrade regional rail infrastructure to better and more safely serve Southern California residents in the future while improving commute times and air quality in advance of the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic and Paralympic Games. Improvements include track additions and enhancements to stations, signals, and grade crossings that will bolster safety and enable more frequent, bi-directional service throughout the day.

...
https://m.metro-magazine.com/news/73...eate-1-3m-jobs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5315  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2020, 3:19 PM
LA21st LA21st is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,003
1.3 million is insane wow.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5316  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2020, 3:38 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,356
No mention of electrification. Incredible.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5317  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2020, 3:58 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,498
^ It’s written in between the rails. Electrification has long been discussed, and any increase in service would go hand-in-hand with it. What needs to be denounced is the fact that only partial electrification is on the table as of right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5318  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2020, 6:16 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,356
I see. They need to get serious. It's embarrassing.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5319  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2020, 2:36 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,498
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5320  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2020, 10:56 PM
plutonicpanda plutonicpanda is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 623
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will O' Wisp View Post
Ha, you give us too much credit.
I am very happy I was wrong about that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:17 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.