Quote:
Originally Posted by Double L
There are some world landmarks that probably shouldn't be; like The Capitol Tower in Los Angeles or Radio City Music Hall. (They are both great places but wouldn't be famous if it weren't for their pop culture influence).
|
Shouldn't be? According to whom? The Capitol Records Building is a modernist landmark and an iconic design.
The Williams Tower is fine, but, IMO, as a bunch of others have pointed out, it's not unlike dozens of others by Johnson or Pelli. Plus:
source
The stone portal is an awkward juxtaposition against the curtain wall, to say the least. Speaking of which, the modular glass panels really distract from the design's (clear) desire for soaring verticality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_denizen
Phillip Johnson getting no love here..
It's easily as iconic as the transamerica pyramid IMO, and better than any pomo skyscraper in NYC. I see shades of it in Dubai and Singapore's scrapers.
|
Disagreed. What elevates postmodernsm beyond slavish recreation is the humor and irreverence with which its best designs approached historical forms. In this regard, few skyscrapers are better than the AT&T Building:
source
Even in Houston, the Bank of America Center is superior to (as well as more identifiably 'Houston' than—at least to this non-resident) the Williams Tower.