HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2024, 11:20 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,945
https://super.news/en/articles/2024/...0-m-tower-plan

Manhattan's Office Market Faces Test with $350M Tower Plan
AEW Capital aims for $350M in bold bet on office market, selling 1920s building for potential 1M sq ft tower redevelopment.



By Tal Alexander
3/29/24


Quote:
AEW Capital Management, a subsidiary of the French investment manager Natixis, has made a bold move by putting up for sale the aging office building at 250 Park Avenue, with aspirations of fetching between $300 million to $350 million. This decision comes at a time when the future of office spaces, particularly in Manhattan, is a subject of intense debate.

The building, a relic of the 1920s and currently 76 percent occupied, is being marketed not for its historical value but for its potential to be demolished and replaced with a modern tower nearly 1 million square feet in size. This strategy, as highlighted by Newmark's marketing materials, is designed to capitalize on the Midtown East rezoning bonuses, positioning the property as a prime candidate for redevelopment in anticipation of the next market cycle.
Quote:
The decision by AEW Capital Management to sell 250 Park Avenue for redevelopment into a modern office tower is a gamble that reflects broader market dynamics. On one hand, it underscores a belief in the continued demand for high-quality office spaces in strategic locations. On the other, it comes at a time when the market is showing signs of softening, with declining rents and shorter lease terms indicating a shift in tenant preferences and priorities.

The juxtaposition of ambitious development projects with the reality of a market adjusting to post-pandemic norms paints a picture of a sector at a crossroads. Investors and developers are navigating a landscape where the traditional value propositions of office real estate are being reevaluated in light of evolving work habits and economic conditions.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2024, 1:50 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,945
4/10/24






__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2024, 4:52 PM
SkyHigher SkyHigher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 398
Potential 1M sq ft tower redevelopment? Vandy is 1.7M and is pretty much twice the footprint. Aka yikes this could be one tall tower which may well finally break the 1700ft barrier. Fingers crossed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2024, 5:22 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,945
^ Yeah, I believe it could end up taller than 270 Park. Not guaranteed to, but it is a possibility.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2024, 6:48 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyHigher View Post
Potential 1M sq ft tower redevelopment? Vandy is 1.7M and is pretty much twice the footprint. Aka yikes this could be one tall tower which may well finally break the 1700ft barrier. Fingers crossed.
I should also point out that zoningwise, Vanderbilt is only a 1.3-1.4 msf building. This site, with a physically smaller footprint, is actually of a slightly larger lot size. I’m not sure how that works, as far as zoning goes. But this site has a FAR of 27, and they can only build on the block portion of the lot (only about 25,000 sf).



__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2024, 5:59 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,945
https://nypost.com/2024/04/21/real-e...ve-boondoggle/


By Lois Weiss
April 21, 2024


Quote:
At 250 Park Ave., on the market through Newmark, lease clauses allow tenants to be booted. Nevertheless, it may simply be torn down and redeveloped to match its neighboring and gigantic new JPMorgan Chase office building.

“It is clearly simpler and faster to rip down and build what you want,” Neveloff said.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2024, 7:24 PM
SkyHigher SkyHigher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 398
Interesting....


Well let's hope 350 Park at 1600ft has started a trend in the area. This building is a similar sized foot print to 350 Park? There are no height limits as such? Therefore I don't know why we ain't well past 1700ft already?

If that Oklahoma Tower at nearly 2000ft goes up the 1776ft record way gone. Midtown needs to get something taller to get that record back.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 12:49 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyHigher View Post
Interesting....


Well let's hope 350 Park at 1600ft has started a trend in the area. This building is a similar sized foot print to 350 Park? There are no height limits as such? Therefore I don't know why we ain't well past 1700ft already?

If that Oklahoma Tower at nearly 2000ft goes up the 1776ft record way gone. Midtown needs to get something taller to get that record back.
What may or may not happen in OKC has no bearing on what happens here.

This site, at 25,000 sq ft, is less than half 350 Park's 350,000 sf. It's actually the same size as 343 Madison's 25,000 sf, but with about a third more development rights.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2024, 1:58 PM
SkyHigher SkyHigher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
What may or may not happen in OKC has no bearing on what happens here.

This site, at 25,000 sq ft, is less than half 350 Park's 350,000 sf. It's actually the same size as 343 Madison's 25,000 sf, but with about a third more development rights.
Ah right. thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Yesterday, 3:55 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,945
Some good stuff in this interview…


https://commercialobserver.com/2024/...filling-space/

Colliers’ Michael Cohen On Filling All That Empty New York Office Space
It all starts with rezoning vast swaths of the city and letting private capital come in



BY DAVID M. LEVITT
APRIL 16, 2024


Quote:
The third thing to consider is teardowns, which may result in more desirable office buildings, or hotels or hospitality — the use is not preordained. We’ve emptied out a building in the Plaza District. SL Green (SLG) had 625 Madison, ours is a stone’s throw away at 655 Madison. We’re going to see those buildings get torn down and replaced probably by a mixture of retail, hospitality, and residential. And I don’t have to tell you that all three of those uses are very desirable in the Plaza District.

I have a theory that I haven’t heard anybody else share, which I will share with you. The city has, for a long time, had very little new development. In the real estate business, a modern building was one that was built in the 1980s or 1990s. There was very little in the wake of the 2001 meltdown, very little construction in the 21st century. And part of the problem was that in the most desirable neighborhoods along Park and Madison and so forth, if you tore down a building, you couldn’t even rebuild what you tore down. So intrepid developers like L&L Holding came up with workarounds.

So we had this inability to create new product due to this anachronistic zoning. L&L used these workarounds, but they were not as satisfying as tearing down an old building and replacing it with a new one. So Hudson Yards was born, I believe, off the overflow of tenants who could not find the large modern new buildings that they needed in Midtown.
Quote:
Simultaneous with Hudson Yards, the city did an experiment with rezoning to allow buildings as large as One Vanderbilt, which proved hugely popular.

The city rezoned the site and allowed SL Green to purchase air rights. In return, the city got transit improvements, and this became a template for the Midtown East rezoning. This resulted in a modern building right in the heart of Midtown.
And, in the wake of One Vanderbilt, the city changed the zoning, so the air rights to St. Patrick’s and Grand Central are fungible over a large swath of Midtown East.

The poster child for this, I always say, is 250 Park, which is in a fabulous location and is being offered for sale right now. It’s a building that has a demolition clause in it. I guarantee you, every buyer looking at that building is looking at it as a development site. It will eventually be torn down and replaced by a supertall.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Yesterday, 4:07 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,393
What a time to be a Michael Cohen
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Yesterday, 4:17 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,945
^ Let’s not.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Yesterday, 7:25 AM
streetscaper streetscaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 2,716
Great article and Q&A!

Really sucks that 250 Park will be torn down.. wish NY developers and LPC would respect NY's heritage a little more... at least integrate a new building into this beautiful old one.
__________________
hmmm....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Yesterday, 4:09 PM
DCReid DCReid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,077
Wonder if JPMC can buy it and turn it into an extended stay hotel for visiting JPMC staff...A wish for such a cute building...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Yesterday, 8:08 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCReid View Post
Wonder if JPMC can buy it and turn it into an extended stay hotel for visiting JPMC staff...A wish for such a cute building...
Not likely.

If JPMC did buy it, it wouldn’t be for hotel space.


Quote:
It will eventually be torn down and replaced by a supertall.
A new tower is the most likely outcome for this site.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Yesterday, 11:19 PM
towerpower123 towerpower123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 143
I guess that was inevitable, but that had better be one gorgeous supertall tower to be worthy of the site and covering part of the Helmsley Building from that iconic Park Avenue view
__________________
If I don't say otherwise, my images are from my blog
https://urbanismvsmodernism.blogspot.com/?view=sidebar
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Today, 1:43 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by towerpower123 View Post
I guess that was inevitable, but that had better be one gorgeous supertall tower to be worthy of the site and covering part of the Helmsley Building from that iconic Park Avenue view
It's a pricey site. Whoever gets control of it is gonna want to get their money's worth and then some. This building, along with the Roosevelt Hotel, offers opportunity for "iconic" buildings (design wise). That doesn't guarantee we will get it.



__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:15 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.