HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #34201  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2016, 9:39 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,617
and pretty much every single one of those get released regardless. why even bother?

the only hope is a creating an appreciation for architecture and built environment so that in time, developers hold the same sentiment and see an incentive to market restored properties. and we only seem to be drifting further away. people are more concerned with catching Pokemon than issues that actually affect the neighborhoods they live in.

i simply dont understand how someone can look at a building like this and say "yes, the destruction of this is what i want my defining legacy and gift to future generations to be."

Last edited by Via Chicago; Jul 13, 2016 at 9:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34202  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2016, 9:48 PM
PKDickman PKDickman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Via Chicago View Post
and pretty much every single one of those get released regardless. why even bother?

the only hope is a creating an appreciation for architecture and built environment so that in time, developers hold the same sentiment and see an incentive to market restored properties. and we only seem to be drifting further away. people are more concerned with catching Pokemon than issues that actually affect the neighborhoods they live in.
That's true, til then you fight the good fight and hope for ones like this.

Status: Application withdrawn 3/17/2016
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34203  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2016, 10:58 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
^^^ Are you saying La Luce is safe? I hope so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34204  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 12:44 AM
bnk bnk is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicagoland
Posts: 12,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Pretty much the defacto HQ will be Chicago. I doubt the CEO spends a whole lot of time in Racine, WI. Sure you can get a Kringle and some great prime rib, but, come on...
Care to share where this said prime rib is. I'm around the area a lot.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34205  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 1:14 AM
BWChicago's Avatar
BWChicago BWChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 486
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
^^^ Are you saying La Luce is safe? I hope so.
That was the parish house at 2746 N. Magnolia Ave for the church at Diversey & Magnolia that was wrecked. They decided to keep the parish house.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34206  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 2:29 AM
ChickeNES's Avatar
ChickeNES ChickeNES is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 442
Speaking of landmarks, apparently someone is adopting Marina City under the Adopt-A-Landmark FAR bonus?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34207  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 3:18 AM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by PKDickman View Post
That is similar to what we did for banks and tied houses, but even then it is difficult with out the owners consent.

But this property, just seems to be a case of "Old and in the way"

From what I can tell, the property went into foreclosure the bank's development arm, M15 acquired title and they are the owners on the demo permit.

However it would appear from recorders records that the bank deeded this property back to morretti (original owner) prior to the demo application. The bank kept the triangular lot on Ogden.

So who knows?
I'll need to check this on the recorders website tomorrow since it's difficult to look up on a phone. I don't know what the city's policy is on transfer of permits or if M-15 still holds title to the property that they can still make alterations to the property.

If the property was transferred back to the owner, the approved permit would...I believe....be invalid
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34208  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 3:25 AM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Via Chicago View Post

people are more concerned with catching Pokemon than issues that actually affect the neighborhoods they live in.
Actually the game encourages visits to historic structures. Just playing the game for 1 hour walking home from work, I learned the names of 3 nineteenth century buildings in River North which was kind of cool.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34209  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 4:47 AM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
^ Did they actually program minutiae of the world's cities into the game? Or does the game just leverage whatever info is in Google/Bing/Here Maps or something? Sounds great either way, but the former would be very impressive.


--------


The IBEW building was one that was supposed to be saved, in tandem with redevelopment, around the end of the last bubble, I thought. But now is nobody giving a second thought to what's going to become of it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34210  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 5:03 AM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by denizen467 View Post
^ Did they actually program minutiae of the world's cities into the game? Or does the game just leverage whatever info is in Google/Bing/Here Maps or something? Sounds great either way, but the former would be very impressive.


--------


The IBEW building was one that was supposed to be saved, in tandem with redevelopment, around the end of the last bubble, I thought. But now is nobody giving a second thought to what's going to become of it?
The content of the game was all manually entered through Ingress. So it's all locally generated over the years with content imported to Pokemon with the same principal that important cultural landmarks allow to you to perform certain tasks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34211  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 5:10 AM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,949
La Luce is beautiful and any demolition would be another reminder of the lack of preservation in this city.

IBEW/SC Johnson - really, why did they buy this? This seems way too small of a site for any kind of major vertical office building, even an econobox. Certainly wouldn't be ideal for a modern, efficient HQ. I don't get the play here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34212  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 1:03 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,450
They could be intending to use it as some sort of showroom for their products or a promotional space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34213  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 2:13 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by KOgc View Post
Looks like the demo fence is up for the buildings on grand avenue just east of Halsted. Is that Brininstool and Lynch project approved to move forward? Maybe I'm confusing that site.
Looks like permits were issued yesterday for demolishing the 1 story building at 712 W Grand Ave.

http://www.chicagocityscape.com/perm...?pid=100655627
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34214  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 3:23 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
IBEW/SC Johnson - really, why did they buy this? This seems way too small of a site for any kind of major vertical office building, even an econobox. Certainly wouldn't be ideal for a modern, efficient HQ. I don't get the play here.
It looks like there is plenty of room or is the parking lot to the north not part of it?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34215  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 3:42 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,379
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kngkyle View Post
It looks like there is plenty of room or is the parking lot to the north not part of it?

That aerial is outdated. The 108 N Jefferson project now takes up that entire lot
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34216  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 4:09 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,885
33 S Aberdeen (have seen listed as 35 S Aberdeen though) was permitted yesterday. 4 stories and 50 units. Another West Loop lot to bite the dust.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34217  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 4:38 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
That aerial is outdated. The 108 N Jefferson project now takes up that entire lot
Doh. I should have known that. In that case spyguy is right, that is a unusually small plot of land for a office tower of any significance. We will just have to wait and see what their plans are.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34218  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 5:22 PM
orulz orulz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 585
Could they develop some vacant plot of land across the street or otherwise nearby, and leave the smaller historic building intact with development rights transferred to the vacant land in order to gain entitlement for greater density/FAR on the vacant plot?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34219  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 7:35 PM
UrbanLibertine UrbanLibertine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
La Luce is beautiful and any demolition would be another reminder of the lack of preservation in this city.

IBEW/SC Johnson - really, why did they buy this? This seems way too small of a site for any kind of major vertical office building, even an econobox. Certainly wouldn't be ideal for a modern, efficient HQ. I don't get the play here.
It's not going to be a very tall building or buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34220  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 10:39 PM
J_M_Tungsten's Avatar
J_M_Tungsten J_M_Tungsten is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,379
Today
Malcolm X demo, and what appears to be simultaneous site prep for the new Blackhawks building. The half of the site that still needs demo is fenced off from the site eastward.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:44 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.