Thanks for the insider information (maybe that a bad term to use when talking about investment banks
)
With GS being the primary occupant of 111, moving their research park employees down and creating more or moving positions from other markets that will greatly increase the market for the CCC condos, including construction of The Cascade. As a large number of GS that were transferred here that work in 222, rented and purchased many units in American Towers.
I estimate that GS committing to 111 is the entire reason it is rising before 151, as they probably pushed the pre-lease level above 45%, often times the benchmark for funding, or maybe they were the entire 45%. Had they signed with 151 that would probably be rising first, and 111 would have been built to street level.
I would estimate that 151 could easily be a target for a new investment bank that wants a presence in SLC, or even City Creek 8, next to Harmons. I doubt investment banks want to be little brother in the same building as another investment bank. So I figure each one will want to be the dominant tenant in the building they occupy. Considering office occupancy rates are in the 90% range there aren't a whole lot of buildings that could accommodate any substantial new tenants.
Investment Banks and other bank headquarters tend to congregate around one another as it provides them access to a greater pool of talent in a concentrated area. Similar to silicon valley and the concentration of tech.
Five years ago, who would have ever thought that Financial Services, could be what grows Salt Lake City's skyline.