Quote:
Originally Posted by savevp
At best, some creative thinking from the Rock and all them might help the CFL innovate away from the slow, stop-start nature of gridiron that has driven fans to soccer and somewhat to rugby in the big cities. If they want ideas, I'm sure many of us have.
|
I'm 100% on board with you here. I've also written some of my ideas for this, on this forum, Reddit, and elsewhere.
This may be somewhat contradictory, but IMO, for all the debating about which sport is better on the field - NFL vs CFL, soccer vs contact sports, rugby union vs rugby league, AFL vs GAA... at the
highest view, the game itself
doesn't fucking matter. What matters is the history, context, attitude, presentation of a league to it's fans. I fucking hate soccer, not the rules itself but the way it's played with diving and whining etc. But guess what - we bought Forge season tickets, because being a new Canadian league was more enticing than the specifics. And I have fun at games! I like it, as long as I sit far away form the "supporters sections".
I don't love the CFL and the Tiger-Cats because I think Canadian Football is the greatest sport on earth. I love it because it is a historic, independent, Canadian league that has been part of our culture. If you take away some or all of those aspects, it loses what makes it special.
People talk about the game, local businesses sponsor the team and have advertising tie-ins, the city runs special busses, we throw parties and parades when they win. The teams volunteer in the community, they get kids involved in physical activity and team building. All this happens because it matters to people, and a diminished league would matter less, and you end up in a feedback loop until it dies.
I see a lot of comments about "the league is dying", "on its last legs", to quote Acajack (just as one example, not to pick on you) "So the options before us right now are a)
a semi-moribund CFL like the status quo, b) a lower level farm league of sorts run by the XFL or c) no pro gridiron football at all" - I don't think I agree with that take. Is it just because I'm in Hamilton, one of the stronger markets? It seems like the league was doing pretty good the last few years? Obvious issues in the big markets, sure. But I went to a RedBlacks game and it felt just as alive and vibrant as games in Hamilton do. Sask and Winnpeg are strong, Calgary has softened, probably due to a bit of winners fatigue, but Montreal has new owners and new life it seemed to me, Toronto has the backing of MLSE to get through their troubles. BC will have new owners soon too.
That doesn't seem semi-moribund.
Anyway, back to my initial thought on - does the rules of the game matter? Kind of, so far as that people use them as a stick to beat the league with. But rugby is way faster than football, why isn't rugby the most popular sport to everyone who finds football too slow? Things could be improved, even diehard fans see that, but I don't think it makes someone a fan or prevents them from being a fan. If you like football you still watch football, but support ways to improve it. All sports do that all the time.
The CFL suffers for it's constant comparison to the NFL. The history of the game made this somewhat inevitable - sports traditions around the world were largely cemented in the late 19th/early 20th centuries, and then, as now, we were so integrated with our much larger neighbour to the south that of course we developed along similar lines.
When I promote Canadian Football evolving in a rugby-type direction, it's not because I think rugby is the best sport. I
do think rugby is the best, but rugby already exists, and we have it here now as well. I argue that because, seemingly against all odds, we have somehow managed to maintain our own, independent version of football. It's not unique in how it is played, but it still our own.
I've been in a pub in Dublin during the GAA football final. They don't care that nobody else in the world plays or even cares about their game. They don't put it down and say "might as well play rugby, that's what all our neighbours play". No, they love it and embrace and celebrate it as part of themselves. Same goes for Australian Rules in Australia (although Aussies are somewhat quick to put down their non-preferred versions of football, due their regionalization). I want that for Canada, and the way to get more of that IMO is by
not being the same as the Americans. We need to do our own thing, rest of the world be damned. But Canadians are awful at that, in all facets of life. Nothing cultural is good or cool unless the Americans think so too, with few exceptions.
Unfortunately, I don't really see this happening. CFL coaches, GMs, refs, etc overwhelmingly come from the American system, either directly or indirectly. The only chance I see is a radical change in the game forced by concussions and player safety. I thought at one time the pandemic could be a catalyst, forcing more use of two-way players and Canadian talent. But we would need the CFL, U Sports, and the entire grassroots of the game on board ot make something like that happen. If anyone here follows the structure of amateur football in Canada, that's a complete pipedream, they can't even agree or unify with the current paradigm.
I don't know what to expect to happen.