HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2014, 5:06 PM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
Hyper-Urbanization: China Plans for 100 Million New City Residents by 2020

China Releases Plan to Incorporate Farmers Into Cities


MARCH 17, 2014

By IAN JOHNSON

Read More: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/wo...in-cities.html

Quote:
China has announced a sweeping plan to manage the flow of rural residents into cities, promising to promote urbanization but also to solve some of the drastic side effects of this great uprooting. The plan — the country’s first attempt at broadly coordinating one of the greatest migrations in history — foresees 100 million more people moving to China’s cities by 2020, while providing better access to schools and hospitals for 100 million former farmers already living in cities but currently denied many basic services.

- The plan floated last year by the government’s powerful planning commission called for 70 percent of the country’s nearly 1.4 billion population to be living in cities by 2025. The current plan aims for 60 percent by 2020. It also emphasizes what has been a relatively new phenomenon over the past decade: the state’s role in deciding who should move from rural land and where they should live. The need for urbanization, the plan asserts, is part of a broader move to shift China’s structure away from growth based on exports and investment, and toward domestic demand.

- Many economists believe that urbanites consume more than farmers, who tend to be more self-sufficient. But the plan also sees urbanization as part of China’s future. It states that “urbanization is modernization” and “urbanization is an inevitable requirement for promoting social progress,” noting that every developed country is urbanized and industrialized.

- The plan strongly emphasizes the improvement of quality of life for new city residents through increased government spending. It also calls for improvement in the quality of building construction, which has sometimes been criticized by new residents. --- “I think it’s good because it touches on problems created by urbanization in the past,” said Yi Peng, the director of the Urbanization Research Center of the International Finance Forum, a Chinese think tank. “Public services have been lacking and urbanization has not been rational.”

- Currently, nearly 54 percent of Chinese live in cities, but only 36 percent are registered as urban residents. That disparity — representing about 250 million people — are former farmers living in cities but not permitted to register as city dwellers. That means they cannot send their children to local schools, use hospitals at subsidized rates or enjoy other benefits of city life. --- The plan calls for integrating 100 million of these second-class citizens, so that by 2020, 60 percent of Chinese should be living in cities, with 45 percent enjoying full urban status, the plan states. --- To make this possible, the government is promising huge infrastructure spending. Every city that exceeds 200,000 in population is to be linked by rail and expressways, while every city exceeding 500,000 is to have high-speed rail service.

- Many urban planners say China’s urbanization plan can only succeed when two related reforms are carried out. One is tax reform, which would either raise money for the central government to pay for urbanization, or give local governments more rights to raise money to pay for the new schools, hospitals, roads and housing that the plan’s goals would require. Currently, local governments have limited rights to levy taxes. --- Another is reforming farmers’ land rights. Land is owned by the government, with only usage rights available to be bought or sold. Giving farmers more rights over their land would make it harder for bureaucrats to confiscate rural land.

.....



Why China's Cities Need to Get Denser, Not Bigger

Read More: http://www.theatlanticcities.com/pol...t-bigger/8716/

Quote:
If the city of Guangzhou, the capital of one of China’s wealthiest provinces, had the same density as Seoul, it could accommodate another 4 million more people on top of its current 15 million. That’s according to a new report by the World Bank that calls on China’s urban planners increase the density of its cities instead expanding its existing urban centers, or constructing entirely new ones.

- Denser cities could save China about $1.4 trillion in infrastructure spending, or the equivalent of 15 percent of last year’s GDP, the report says. And denser urban planning should help conserve the shrinking amount of land that China has to feed its population, which has lowered the country’s self sufficiency. --- If higher density makes so much sense, why haven’t Chinese cities embraced it already? One major reason is that local governments are highly dependent on selling undeveloped land to developers. Redeveloping existing cities to make them more dense wouldn’t result in any local government revenue.

.....
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2014, 5:36 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,795
I remember reading something similar. China is just from a construction standpoint godly. This year alone, 2014, they are planning to build 35 million new units of residential.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2014, 12:31 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,087
^ And they're not finished yet.

Instead of building entirely new cities, China should focus on expanding and densifying existing metropolitan regions, especially those that are smaller in size.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2014, 12:50 AM
M II A II R II K's Avatar
M II A II R II K M II A II R II K is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 52,200
And if they're going to build new ghost towns, why not move the crowded people in existing cities there. China is one place where there is no excuse for ghost cities.
__________________
ASDFGHJK
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2014, 12:58 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,795
They have so many challenges in the pipeline. All of this housing, transportation and infrastructure, traffic management, job creation, and the biggie, pollution control. I gotta give credit to the govt. there, they got a full plate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2014, 4:16 AM
Jasonhouse Jasonhouse is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 23,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by M II A II R II K View Post
And if they're going to build new ghost towns, why not move the crowded people in existing cities there. China is one place where there is no excuse for ghost cities.
Why are they empty? Is some basic utility missing or something? Are there really empty cities, or is the issue more like certain building types being overbuilt within a particular city?

Definitely shouldn't be an issue in a nation with such a staggering population.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2014, 1:05 AM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is online now
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,873
Quote:
Originally Posted by M II A II R II K View Post
China Releases Plan to Incorporate Farmers Into Cities


MARCH 17, 2014

By IAN JOHNSON

Read More: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/wo...in-cities.html






Why China's Cities Need to Get Denser, Not Bigger

Read More: http://www.theatlanticcities.com/pol...t-bigger/8716/




Seoul is denser than Tokyo. On account of the topography, mainly.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2014, 2:47 AM
llamaorama llamaorama is offline
Unicorn Wizard!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4,210
Quote:
The plan calls for integrating 100 million of these second-class citizens, so that by 2020, 60 percent of Chinese should be living in cities, with 45 percent enjoying full urban status, the plan states.
That's it?

China needs MOAR buildings! Build MOAR! MAOORR!
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:41 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.