HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted May 18, 2014, 7:24 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,945
Grand Rapids: Then and now

Quote:
Then & now: Interactive slides show downtown Grand Rapids develop before your eyes
By Garret Ellison. May 18, 2014.

Few places in Grand Rapids have changed as radically in the last half century as north downtown.

The streets where the people of Grand Rapids once shopped for clothes, took music lessons, visited the dentist, ate dinner and watched movies were transformed decades ago into a center of banking and government.

Between 1962 and 1969, more than 120 buildings downtown died at the hands of wrecking crews; their remains were dumped into Riverside Park as infill. In their place rose taller, modern structures that city leaders hoped would help Grand Rapids shed it pioneer-era days and regain its status as the state's 'second city.'

Images are necessary to really tell the full story of this transition.
































Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 12:08 AM
JonathanGRR JonathanGRR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 364
I noticed this series on MLive also; I'm glad someone posted it.

Part of me wants to just forget that this all happened and declare an end to the rehashing of the 'urban renewal story.' Yet, at the same time, I know that it is important for us to keep looking back on the past in order to not repeat the same mistakes. I like how the articles keep going back to a 'what if' scenario, but I think there is absolutely no way to imagine Grand Rapids today with all of its old architecture intact. It is possible that the argument can be justified that Grand Rapids is better off now. The southern portion of downtown (the portion that mostly remained) is now quite vibrant and rejuvenated; there are only a few buildings still awaiting renovation. If all of downtown was saved, the revival of downtown would probably be less concentrated than it is now, and the effects of the revival may not be as prominent.

While I would have been the first to argue for keeping all of our historic buildings (and not just the great architectural gems) from being demolished, their sacrifice, if you will, is what allowed the rest to be saved. The same thing happened with Grand Rapids' Heritage Hill neighborhood, one of the nations first and largest urban historic districts. In a response to some significant houses being demolished (including the Bissell House) and the city's plan to level 75% of the area in the name of urban renewal, the Heritage Hill Association was formed. The group got the neighborhood placed on the national register, and they fought many battles with the city and developers in order to keep the integrity of the district. Without the loss of some of the area's best homes, the catalyst for change likely would have never happened. Likewise, the loss of some of the great buildings downtown (most importantly city hall) led to the outcry to revitalize what was left. It's a chicken-and-an-egg situation; the renewal, unfortunately, would not have come about without the destruction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 1:09 AM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,280
Wow this is depressing. But a story played out almost everywhere in America. Crappy 60s architecture in greenspace surrounded by parking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 2:32 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,356
^^ I think there's more truth to that than you realize. I tend to view urban renewal as a triage action more than a desecration. These areas were already declining. Demolition might have happened anyway without government support, as landowners saw more money in parking spaces (or fire insurance) than they did in small retail/office spaces.

The introduction of the car post-WWII unleashed a huge change on America's downtowns but the large office, government, and medical buildings built during this era maintained at least some kind of economic heartbeat in these obsolete, dying areas. It's not like the car is some passing fad... cities like Grand Rapids still have to accommodate large amounts of parking in their downtown. Tearing down large numbers of decaying buildings was the only cost-effective option available to many cities to bring motorists downtown.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 6:16 AM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayward View Post
Wow this is depressing. But a story played out almost everywhere in America. Crappy 60s architecture in greenspace surrounded by parking.
I do agree the architecture is kind of plain, but the area still looks pretty walkable and the greenspace seems nice compared to the grit and soot that was on the older buildings.

There's worse examples of urban renewal but if I can say one thing positive about GR's is that it does make the city look larger and if a few of the high rises were more iconic, it'd definitely could be a draw to the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 9:14 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,745
That view looking up the hill on Michigan makes me so sad. What's crazy is that GR's inner-city is still more intact than most in the state, which kind of tells you just how much there was.
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 1:18 PM
Rizzo Rizzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by animatedmartian View Post
I do agree the architecture is kind of plain, but the area still looks pretty walkable and the greenspace seems nice compared to the grit and soot that was on the older buildings.

There's worse examples of urban renewal but if I can say one thing positive about GR's is that it does make the city look larger and if a few of the high rises were more iconic, it'd definitely could be a draw to the area.
Couldn't disagree with you more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 2:57 PM
Cleveland Brown's Avatar
Cleveland Brown Cleveland Brown is offline
Always A Classic
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,894
I just LOVE cheap, copy-cat, 1960s lowrises, said no one ever. I don't see a single redeeming post-1960s building in those photos and it looks like the city is still building the cheap, copy-cat, lowrises of the oughts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted May 19, 2014, 7:18 PM
animatedmartian's Avatar
animatedmartian animatedmartian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayward View Post
Couldn't disagree with you more.
Just trying to look on the bright side.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted May 20, 2014, 12:15 AM
untitledreality untitledreality is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,043
Good lord that is depressing. The only redeeming quality I see here is that no one will give a damn when the wrecking ball returns to these areas
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted May 20, 2014, 12:17 AM
untitledreality untitledreality is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by animatedmartian View Post
but the area still looks pretty walkable
"Walkable" means much more than possessing the ability to be walked... which is where the buck stops in these photographs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted May 20, 2014, 12:35 AM
JonathanGRR JonathanGRR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by untitledreality View Post
Good lord that is depressing. The only redeeming quality I see here is that no one will give a damn when the wrecking ball returns to these areas
The sad thing is, some people actually are. Michigan State University has bought the old Press Building (last picture) along with other properties in the area in order to expand their medical campus. Some posters on the media sites were lamenting that the building might (likely will) be demolished as a result. There are also others who are in an uproar about Calder Plaza (large concrete plaza in the first picture) becoming greener...it's sad, really.

Luckily, the official urban renewal area stayed north of Lyons Street. Some great buildings were lost south of there, but most are still intact. Not surprisingly, that's where most people tend to go when they head downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Apr 12, 2015, 9:42 PM
ChiTownWonder's Avatar
ChiTownWonder ChiTownWonder is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 618
damn, and i thought Chicago had it bad... what happened?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2015, 12:31 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,375
I like the "then" more than the "now"

The city looks soulless and dime a dozen in the more recent pics. Boo
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2015, 8:53 PM
JonathanGRR JonathanGRR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London
Posts: 364
While the losses that were sustained were devastating, it should be noted that the pictures are only "then and now" of the areas that were hit by urban renewal. Half of downtown still managed to survive and is doing quite well:


DSCN3331 by jonathantherapidian, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Midwest
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:56 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.